Cargando…

Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations

Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meloni, Silvio Mario, Melis, Luca, Xhanari, Erta, Tallarico, Marco, Spano, Giovanni, Pisano, Milena, Baldoni, Edoardo, Cervino, Gabriele, Tullio, Antonio, Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135
_version_ 1783628495026388992
author Meloni, Silvio Mario
Melis, Luca
Xhanari, Erta
Tallarico, Marco
Spano, Giovanni
Pisano, Milena
Baldoni, Edoardo
Cervino, Gabriele
Tullio, Antonio
Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
author_facet Meloni, Silvio Mario
Melis, Luca
Xhanari, Erta
Tallarico, Marco
Spano, Giovanni
Pisano, Milena
Baldoni, Edoardo
Cervino, Gabriele
Tullio, Antonio
Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
author_sort Meloni, Silvio Mario
collection PubMed
description Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that received a prosthetic rehabilitation on conical connection implants with partial machined collar (PMC; CC Group) and same body-designed implants, with flat-to-flat connection and groovy neck design (FC Group). Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of previously collected data, including documents, radiographs, and pictures of patients who received at least one implant-supported restoration on NobelReplace CC PMC or NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implants was performed. Patients with at least three years of follow-up after final loading were considered for this study. Outcomes measures were implant and prosthesis failures, any biological or technical complications, marginal bone loss. Results: Eight-two patients (44 women, 38 men; average age 55.6) with 152 implants were selected and divided in two groups with 77 (CC group) and 75 (FC group), respectively. Three years after final loading, one implant in CC group failed (98.7% survival rate), while no implants failed in FC group (100% survival rate). One restoration failed in CC group (98.7% survival rate) with no restoration failing in the FC one (100% survival rate). Differences were not statistically significant (p = 1.0). Three years after final loading, mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.06 mm (95% CI 0.2–0.24) in CC group and 0.62 ± 0.30 mm (95% CI 0.52–0.72) in FC group. The difference was statistically significant (0.40 ± 0.13 mm; 95% CI 0.3–0.5; p = 0.003). Conclusion: with the limitation of this retrospective comparative study, implants with conical connection and partial machined collar seem to achieve a trend of superior outcomes if compared with implants with flat connection and groovy collar design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7765458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77654582020-12-27 Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations Meloni, Silvio Mario Melis, Luca Xhanari, Erta Tallarico, Marco Spano, Giovanni Pisano, Milena Baldoni, Edoardo Cervino, Gabriele Tullio, Antonio Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata Dent J (Basel) Article Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that received a prosthetic rehabilitation on conical connection implants with partial machined collar (PMC; CC Group) and same body-designed implants, with flat-to-flat connection and groovy neck design (FC Group). Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of previously collected data, including documents, radiographs, and pictures of patients who received at least one implant-supported restoration on NobelReplace CC PMC or NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implants was performed. Patients with at least three years of follow-up after final loading were considered for this study. Outcomes measures were implant and prosthesis failures, any biological or technical complications, marginal bone loss. Results: Eight-two patients (44 women, 38 men; average age 55.6) with 152 implants were selected and divided in two groups with 77 (CC group) and 75 (FC group), respectively. Three years after final loading, one implant in CC group failed (98.7% survival rate), while no implants failed in FC group (100% survival rate). One restoration failed in CC group (98.7% survival rate) with no restoration failing in the FC one (100% survival rate). Differences were not statistically significant (p = 1.0). Three years after final loading, mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.06 mm (95% CI 0.2–0.24) in CC group and 0.62 ± 0.30 mm (95% CI 0.52–0.72) in FC group. The difference was statistically significant (0.40 ± 0.13 mm; 95% CI 0.3–0.5; p = 0.003). Conclusion: with the limitation of this retrospective comparative study, implants with conical connection and partial machined collar seem to achieve a trend of superior outcomes if compared with implants with flat connection and groovy collar design. MDPI 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7765458/ /pubmed/33333998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meloni, Silvio Mario
Melis, Luca
Xhanari, Erta
Tallarico, Marco
Spano, Giovanni
Pisano, Milena
Baldoni, Edoardo
Cervino, Gabriele
Tullio, Antonio
Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title_full Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title_fullStr Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title_short Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
title_sort three-year retrospective comparative study between implants with same body-design but different crest module configurations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135
work_keys_str_mv AT melonisilviomario threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT melisluca threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT xhanarierta threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT tallaricomarco threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT spanogiovanni threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT pisanomilena threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT baldoniedoardo threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT cervinogabriele threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT tullioantonio threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations
AT lumbauaureaimmacolata threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations