Cargando…
Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations
Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135 |
_version_ | 1783628495026388992 |
---|---|
author | Meloni, Silvio Mario Melis, Luca Xhanari, Erta Tallarico, Marco Spano, Giovanni Pisano, Milena Baldoni, Edoardo Cervino, Gabriele Tullio, Antonio Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata |
author_facet | Meloni, Silvio Mario Melis, Luca Xhanari, Erta Tallarico, Marco Spano, Giovanni Pisano, Milena Baldoni, Edoardo Cervino, Gabriele Tullio, Antonio Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata |
author_sort | Meloni, Silvio Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that received a prosthetic rehabilitation on conical connection implants with partial machined collar (PMC; CC Group) and same body-designed implants, with flat-to-flat connection and groovy neck design (FC Group). Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of previously collected data, including documents, radiographs, and pictures of patients who received at least one implant-supported restoration on NobelReplace CC PMC or NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implants was performed. Patients with at least three years of follow-up after final loading were considered for this study. Outcomes measures were implant and prosthesis failures, any biological or technical complications, marginal bone loss. Results: Eight-two patients (44 women, 38 men; average age 55.6) with 152 implants were selected and divided in two groups with 77 (CC group) and 75 (FC group), respectively. Three years after final loading, one implant in CC group failed (98.7% survival rate), while no implants failed in FC group (100% survival rate). One restoration failed in CC group (98.7% survival rate) with no restoration failing in the FC one (100% survival rate). Differences were not statistically significant (p = 1.0). Three years after final loading, mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.06 mm (95% CI 0.2–0.24) in CC group and 0.62 ± 0.30 mm (95% CI 0.52–0.72) in FC group. The difference was statistically significant (0.40 ± 0.13 mm; 95% CI 0.3–0.5; p = 0.003). Conclusion: with the limitation of this retrospective comparative study, implants with conical connection and partial machined collar seem to achieve a trend of superior outcomes if compared with implants with flat connection and groovy collar design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7765458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77654582020-12-27 Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations Meloni, Silvio Mario Melis, Luca Xhanari, Erta Tallarico, Marco Spano, Giovanni Pisano, Milena Baldoni, Edoardo Cervino, Gabriele Tullio, Antonio Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata Dent J (Basel) Article Crest module can be defined as the portion of a two-piece implant designed to retain the prosthetic components and to allows the maintenance of the peri-implant tissues in the transition zone. Aim: To evaluate the three-year after loading clinical and radiographic data, collected from patients that received a prosthetic rehabilitation on conical connection implants with partial machined collar (PMC; CC Group) and same body-designed implants, with flat-to-flat connection and groovy neck design (FC Group). Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of previously collected data, including documents, radiographs, and pictures of patients who received at least one implant-supported restoration on NobelReplace CC PMC or NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implants was performed. Patients with at least three years of follow-up after final loading were considered for this study. Outcomes measures were implant and prosthesis failures, any biological or technical complications, marginal bone loss. Results: Eight-two patients (44 women, 38 men; average age 55.6) with 152 implants were selected and divided in two groups with 77 (CC group) and 75 (FC group), respectively. Three years after final loading, one implant in CC group failed (98.7% survival rate), while no implants failed in FC group (100% survival rate). One restoration failed in CC group (98.7% survival rate) with no restoration failing in the FC one (100% survival rate). Differences were not statistically significant (p = 1.0). Three years after final loading, mean marginal bone loss was 0.22 ± 0.06 mm (95% CI 0.2–0.24) in CC group and 0.62 ± 0.30 mm (95% CI 0.52–0.72) in FC group. The difference was statistically significant (0.40 ± 0.13 mm; 95% CI 0.3–0.5; p = 0.003). Conclusion: with the limitation of this retrospective comparative study, implants with conical connection and partial machined collar seem to achieve a trend of superior outcomes if compared with implants with flat connection and groovy collar design. MDPI 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7765458/ /pubmed/33333998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Meloni, Silvio Mario Melis, Luca Xhanari, Erta Tallarico, Marco Spano, Giovanni Pisano, Milena Baldoni, Edoardo Cervino, Gabriele Tullio, Antonio Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title | Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title_full | Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title_fullStr | Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title_short | Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations |
title_sort | three-year retrospective comparative study between implants with same body-design but different crest module configurations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT melonisilviomario threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT melisluca threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT xhanarierta threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT tallaricomarco threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT spanogiovanni threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT pisanomilena threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT baldoniedoardo threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT cervinogabriele threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT tullioantonio threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations AT lumbauaureaimmacolata threeyearretrospectivecomparativestudybetweenimplantswithsamebodydesignbutdifferentcrestmoduleconfigurations |