Cargando…

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hailang, Tang, Kun, Peng, Ejun, Wang, Liang, Xia, Ding, Chen, Zhiqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376402
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167
_version_ 1783628555902517248
author Liu, Hailang
Tang, Kun
Peng, Ejun
Wang, Liang
Xia, Ding
Chen, Zhiqiang
author_facet Liu, Hailang
Tang, Kun
Peng, Ejun
Wang, Liang
Xia, Ding
Chen, Zhiqiang
author_sort Liu, Hailang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted models were developed from 16 clinical features using logistic regression (LR), logistic regression optimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regularization (Lasso-LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the curve (AUC) was applied to determine the model with the highest discrimination. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the calibration and clinical usefulness of each model. RESULTS: A total of 530 PCa patients were included in this study. The Lasso-LR model showed good discrimination with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.776, 0.712, 0.679, 0.745, 0.730, and 0.695, respectively, followed by SVM (AUC=0.740, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.690–0.790), LR (AUC=0.725, 95% CI=0.674–0.776) and RF (AUC=0.666, 95% CI=0.618–0.714). Validation of the model showed that the Lasso-LR model had the best discriminative power (AUC=0.735, 95% CI=0.656–0.813), followed by SVM (AUC=0.723, 95% CI=0.644–0.802), LR (AUC=0.697, 95% CI=0.615–0.778) and RF (AUC=0.607, 95% CI=0.531–0.684) in the testing dataset. Both the Lasso-LR and SVM models were well-calibrated. DCA plots demonstrated that the predictive models except RF were clinically useful. CONCLUSION: The Lasso-LR model had good discrimination in the prediction of patients at high risk of harboring incorrect Gleason grade group assignment, and the use of this model may be greatly beneficial to urologists in treatment planning, patient selection, and the decision-making process for PCa patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7765752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77657522020-12-28 Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models Liu, Hailang Tang, Kun Peng, Ejun Wang, Liang Xia, Ding Chen, Zhiqiang Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted models were developed from 16 clinical features using logistic regression (LR), logistic regression optimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regularization (Lasso-LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the curve (AUC) was applied to determine the model with the highest discrimination. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the calibration and clinical usefulness of each model. RESULTS: A total of 530 PCa patients were included in this study. The Lasso-LR model showed good discrimination with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.776, 0.712, 0.679, 0.745, 0.730, and 0.695, respectively, followed by SVM (AUC=0.740, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.690–0.790), LR (AUC=0.725, 95% CI=0.674–0.776) and RF (AUC=0.666, 95% CI=0.618–0.714). Validation of the model showed that the Lasso-LR model had the best discriminative power (AUC=0.735, 95% CI=0.656–0.813), followed by SVM (AUC=0.723, 95% CI=0.644–0.802), LR (AUC=0.697, 95% CI=0.615–0.778) and RF (AUC=0.607, 95% CI=0.531–0.684) in the testing dataset. Both the Lasso-LR and SVM models were well-calibrated. DCA plots demonstrated that the predictive models except RF were clinically useful. CONCLUSION: The Lasso-LR model had good discrimination in the prediction of patients at high risk of harboring incorrect Gleason grade group assignment, and the use of this model may be greatly beneficial to urologists in treatment planning, patient selection, and the decision-making process for PCa patients. Dove 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7765752/ /pubmed/33376402 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167 Text en © 2020 Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Hailang
Tang, Kun
Peng, Ejun
Wang, Liang
Xia, Ding
Chen, Zhiqiang
Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title_full Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title_fullStr Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title_short Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
title_sort predicting prostate cancer upgrading of biopsy gleason grade group at radical prostatectomy using machine learning-assisted decision-support models
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376402
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhailang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels
AT tangkun predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels
AT pengejun predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels
AT wangliang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels
AT xiading predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels
AT chenzhiqiang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels