Cargando…
Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376402 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167 |
_version_ | 1783628555902517248 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Hailang Tang, Kun Peng, Ejun Wang, Liang Xia, Ding Chen, Zhiqiang |
author_facet | Liu, Hailang Tang, Kun Peng, Ejun Wang, Liang Xia, Ding Chen, Zhiqiang |
author_sort | Liu, Hailang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted models were developed from 16 clinical features using logistic regression (LR), logistic regression optimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regularization (Lasso-LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the curve (AUC) was applied to determine the model with the highest discrimination. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the calibration and clinical usefulness of each model. RESULTS: A total of 530 PCa patients were included in this study. The Lasso-LR model showed good discrimination with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.776, 0.712, 0.679, 0.745, 0.730, and 0.695, respectively, followed by SVM (AUC=0.740, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.690–0.790), LR (AUC=0.725, 95% CI=0.674–0.776) and RF (AUC=0.666, 95% CI=0.618–0.714). Validation of the model showed that the Lasso-LR model had the best discriminative power (AUC=0.735, 95% CI=0.656–0.813), followed by SVM (AUC=0.723, 95% CI=0.644–0.802), LR (AUC=0.697, 95% CI=0.615–0.778) and RF (AUC=0.607, 95% CI=0.531–0.684) in the testing dataset. Both the Lasso-LR and SVM models were well-calibrated. DCA plots demonstrated that the predictive models except RF were clinically useful. CONCLUSION: The Lasso-LR model had good discrimination in the prediction of patients at high risk of harboring incorrect Gleason grade group assignment, and the use of this model may be greatly beneficial to urologists in treatment planning, patient selection, and the decision-making process for PCa patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7765752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77657522020-12-28 Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models Liu, Hailang Tang, Kun Peng, Ejun Wang, Liang Xia, Ding Chen, Zhiqiang Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-assisted model capable of accurately predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason grade group upgrading before making treatment decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Four ML-assisted models were developed from 16 clinical features using logistic regression (LR), logistic regression optimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regularization (Lasso-LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). The area under the curve (AUC) was applied to determine the model with the highest discrimination. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the calibration and clinical usefulness of each model. RESULTS: A total of 530 PCa patients were included in this study. The Lasso-LR model showed good discrimination with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.776, 0.712, 0.679, 0.745, 0.730, and 0.695, respectively, followed by SVM (AUC=0.740, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.690–0.790), LR (AUC=0.725, 95% CI=0.674–0.776) and RF (AUC=0.666, 95% CI=0.618–0.714). Validation of the model showed that the Lasso-LR model had the best discriminative power (AUC=0.735, 95% CI=0.656–0.813), followed by SVM (AUC=0.723, 95% CI=0.644–0.802), LR (AUC=0.697, 95% CI=0.615–0.778) and RF (AUC=0.607, 95% CI=0.531–0.684) in the testing dataset. Both the Lasso-LR and SVM models were well-calibrated. DCA plots demonstrated that the predictive models except RF were clinically useful. CONCLUSION: The Lasso-LR model had good discrimination in the prediction of patients at high risk of harboring incorrect Gleason grade group assignment, and the use of this model may be greatly beneficial to urologists in treatment planning, patient selection, and the decision-making process for PCa patients. Dove 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7765752/ /pubmed/33376402 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167 Text en © 2020 Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Liu, Hailang Tang, Kun Peng, Ejun Wang, Liang Xia, Ding Chen, Zhiqiang Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title | Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title_full | Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title_fullStr | Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title_short | Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models |
title_sort | predicting prostate cancer upgrading of biopsy gleason grade group at radical prostatectomy using machine learning-assisted decision-support models |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376402 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S286167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhailang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels AT tangkun predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels AT pengejun predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels AT wangliang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels AT xiading predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels AT chenzhiqiang predictingprostatecancerupgradingofbiopsygleasongradegroupatradicalprostatectomyusingmachinelearningassisteddecisionsupportmodels |