Cargando…

Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research

Background: Theories can provide a foundation to explain behavior, investigate relationships, and to predict the effect of interventions. The aim of the study was to clarify the use of theories in studies testing interventions to promote self-care. Method: A scoping review. PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaarsma, Tiny, Westland, Heleen, Vellone, Ercole, Freedland, Kenneth E., Schröder, Carin, Trappenburg, Jaap C. A., Strömberg, Anna, Riegel, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249480
_version_ 1783628573994647552
author Jaarsma, Tiny
Westland, Heleen
Vellone, Ercole
Freedland, Kenneth E.
Schröder, Carin
Trappenburg, Jaap C. A.
Strömberg, Anna
Riegel, Barbara
author_facet Jaarsma, Tiny
Westland, Heleen
Vellone, Ercole
Freedland, Kenneth E.
Schröder, Carin
Trappenburg, Jaap C. A.
Strömberg, Anna
Riegel, Barbara
author_sort Jaarsma, Tiny
collection PubMed
description Background: Theories can provide a foundation to explain behavior, investigate relationships, and to predict the effect of interventions. The aim of the study was to clarify the use of theories in studies testing interventions to promote self-care. Method: A scoping review. PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched from January 2008 through January 2019. Nine common chronic conditions were included. We included studies testing a self-care intervention if they used a randomized controlled trial design. The study was registered in PROSPERO (#123719). Results: The search retrieved 9309 potential studies, of which 233 were included in the review. In total, 76 (33%) of the 233 studies used a theory and 24 different theories were used. Bandura’s social cognitive theory was the most frequently used (48 studies), but 22 other theories were used in a minority of studies. Most studies used theories minimally to justify or provide a rationale for the study, to develop the intervention, to select outcomes, and/or to explain the results. Only eight studies fully used a theory in the rationale, intervention development, choice of outcomes, and discussion. Conclusion: The use of theories to guide self-care research is limited, which may pose a barrier in accumulating knowledge underlying self-care interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7765830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77658302020-12-28 Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research Jaarsma, Tiny Westland, Heleen Vellone, Ercole Freedland, Kenneth E. Schröder, Carin Trappenburg, Jaap C. A. Strömberg, Anna Riegel, Barbara Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Theories can provide a foundation to explain behavior, investigate relationships, and to predict the effect of interventions. The aim of the study was to clarify the use of theories in studies testing interventions to promote self-care. Method: A scoping review. PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched from January 2008 through January 2019. Nine common chronic conditions were included. We included studies testing a self-care intervention if they used a randomized controlled trial design. The study was registered in PROSPERO (#123719). Results: The search retrieved 9309 potential studies, of which 233 were included in the review. In total, 76 (33%) of the 233 studies used a theory and 24 different theories were used. Bandura’s social cognitive theory was the most frequently used (48 studies), but 22 other theories were used in a minority of studies. Most studies used theories minimally to justify or provide a rationale for the study, to develop the intervention, to select outcomes, and/or to explain the results. Only eight studies fully used a theory in the rationale, intervention development, choice of outcomes, and discussion. Conclusion: The use of theories to guide self-care research is limited, which may pose a barrier in accumulating knowledge underlying self-care interventions. MDPI 2020-12-17 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7765830/ /pubmed/33348884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249480 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jaarsma, Tiny
Westland, Heleen
Vellone, Ercole
Freedland, Kenneth E.
Schröder, Carin
Trappenburg, Jaap C. A.
Strömberg, Anna
Riegel, Barbara
Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title_full Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title_fullStr Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title_full_unstemmed Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title_short Status of Theory Use in Self-Care Research
title_sort status of theory use in self-care research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249480
work_keys_str_mv AT jaarsmatiny statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT westlandheleen statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT velloneercole statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT freedlandkennethe statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT schrodercarin statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT trappenburgjaapca statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT stromberganna statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch
AT riegelbarbara statusoftheoryuseinselfcareresearch