Cargando…

One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study

Aim: (PRIMARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the test (definitive abutment (DEF)) and control (healing abutment (HEA)) groups. (SECONDARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the 1 mm high abutment gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ríos-Santos, José Vicente, Tello-González, Gregorio, Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro, Gil Mur, Francisco Javier, Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca, Fernández-Palacín, Ana, Herrero-Climent, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249453
_version_ 1783628577729675264
author Ríos-Santos, José Vicente
Tello-González, Gregorio
Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro
Gil Mur, Francisco Javier
Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca
Fernández-Palacín, Ana
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
author_facet Ríos-Santos, José Vicente
Tello-González, Gregorio
Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro
Gil Mur, Francisco Javier
Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca
Fernández-Palacín, Ana
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
author_sort Ríos-Santos, José Vicente
collection PubMed
description Aim: (PRIMARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the test (definitive abutment (DEF)) and control (healing abutment (HEA)) groups. (SECONDARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the 1 mm high abutment group and 2 mm abutment group. Evaluate changes in implant stability recorded with analysis of the resonance frequency (RFA) Osstell system, at 6 and 12 months after implant placement, between the control group (HEA) and test (DEF). For the DEF group, the abutment was placed at the time of the surgery and was never removed. For the HEA group, the abutment was removed three times during the manufacture of the crowns. The abutments used were 1 mm high (Subgroup A) and 2 mm high (Subgroup B). Materials and methods: A total of 147 patients were selected between 54.82 ± 11.92 years old. After implant placement, patients were randomly distributed in the DEF and HEA group. After the implant placement, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the peri-implant bone level; the same procedure was carried out 6 and 12 months post-placement. To compare the qualitative variables between the groups (HEA/DEF), the Chi-square test was used; for quantitative (MANOVA). Results: After a year, the accumulated bone loss was 0.48 ± 0.71 mm for the HEA group and 0.36 ± 0.79 mm for the DEF group, without statistical significance. Differences were only found due to timing (time) between 0 and 6 months (=0.001) and 0 and 12 months (0.001), with no differences attributable to the study groups (DEF and HEA). The accumulated bone loss (1 year) was 0.45 ± 0.78 mm for the 1 mm abutment group and 0.41 ± 0.70 mm for the 2 mm abutment group (p = 0.02). No differences were observed in implant stability between groups. Conclusions: The “One Abutment—One Time” concept does not reduce peri-implant bone loss compared to the connection–disconnection technique. The height of the abutment does influence bone loss: the higher the abutment, the lower the bone loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7765846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77658462020-12-28 One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study Ríos-Santos, José Vicente Tello-González, Gregorio Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro Gil Mur, Francisco Javier Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca Fernández-Palacín, Ana Herrero-Climent, Mariano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Aim: (PRIMARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the test (definitive abutment (DEF)) and control (healing abutment (HEA)) groups. (SECONDARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the 1 mm high abutment group and 2 mm abutment group. Evaluate changes in implant stability recorded with analysis of the resonance frequency (RFA) Osstell system, at 6 and 12 months after implant placement, between the control group (HEA) and test (DEF). For the DEF group, the abutment was placed at the time of the surgery and was never removed. For the HEA group, the abutment was removed three times during the manufacture of the crowns. The abutments used were 1 mm high (Subgroup A) and 2 mm high (Subgroup B). Materials and methods: A total of 147 patients were selected between 54.82 ± 11.92 years old. After implant placement, patients were randomly distributed in the DEF and HEA group. After the implant placement, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the peri-implant bone level; the same procedure was carried out 6 and 12 months post-placement. To compare the qualitative variables between the groups (HEA/DEF), the Chi-square test was used; for quantitative (MANOVA). Results: After a year, the accumulated bone loss was 0.48 ± 0.71 mm for the HEA group and 0.36 ± 0.79 mm for the DEF group, without statistical significance. Differences were only found due to timing (time) between 0 and 6 months (=0.001) and 0 and 12 months (0.001), with no differences attributable to the study groups (DEF and HEA). The accumulated bone loss (1 year) was 0.45 ± 0.78 mm for the 1 mm abutment group and 0.41 ± 0.70 mm for the 2 mm abutment group (p = 0.02). No differences were observed in implant stability between groups. Conclusions: The “One Abutment—One Time” concept does not reduce peri-implant bone loss compared to the connection–disconnection technique. The height of the abutment does influence bone loss: the higher the abutment, the lower the bone loss. MDPI 2020-12-17 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7765846/ /pubmed/33348644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249453 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ríos-Santos, José Vicente
Tello-González, Gregorio
Lázaro-Calvo, Pedro
Gil Mur, Francisco Javier
Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca
Fernández-Palacín, Ana
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title_full One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title_fullStr One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title_short One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
title_sort one abutment one time: a multicenter, prospective, controlled, randomized study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249453
work_keys_str_mv AT riossantosjosevicente oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT tellogonzalezgregorio oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT lazarocalvopedro oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT gilmurfranciscojavier oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT rioscarrascoblanca oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT fernandezpalacinana oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy
AT herreroclimentmariano oneabutmentonetimeamulticenterprospectivecontrolledrandomizedstudy