Cargando…

Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core

The aim of this study was to measure the energy absorbed by composite panels with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) skins and a 5052 aluminum alloy honeycomb core and to compare it to previous research and isotropic material—two 25 × 1.75 mm 1.0562 alloy steel tubes. The panel skins layup consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mogilski, Maciej, Jabłoński, Maciej, Deroszewska, Martyna, Saraczyn, Robert, Tracz, Jan, Kowalik, Michał, Rządkowski, Witold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245807
_version_ 1783628593264328704
author Mogilski, Maciej
Jabłoński, Maciej
Deroszewska, Martyna
Saraczyn, Robert
Tracz, Jan
Kowalik, Michał
Rządkowski, Witold
author_facet Mogilski, Maciej
Jabłoński, Maciej
Deroszewska, Martyna
Saraczyn, Robert
Tracz, Jan
Kowalik, Michał
Rządkowski, Witold
author_sort Mogilski, Maciej
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to measure the energy absorbed by composite panels with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) skins and a 5052 aluminum alloy honeycomb core and to compare it to previous research and isotropic material—two 25 × 1.75 mm 1.0562 alloy steel tubes. The panel skins layup consisted of pre-impregnated Pyrofil TR30S 210 gsm 3K 2 × 2 twill oriented in directions 0/90 and −45/45 and having a consolidated thickness of 1 mm or 2 mm. The core consisted of a 15 mm or 20 mm honeycomb oriented along its lengthwise direction. The first test consisted of a three-point bending of specimens supported at a span of 400 mm with a 50 mm radius tubular load applicator in the middle. Second, a perimeter shear test was conducted using a 25 mm diameter punch and a 38 mm diameter hole. The results of the three-point bending test show that the energy absorbed by panels with 1 mm skins was similar to the energy absorbed by the tubes (96 J), which was better than the previously considered panels. In the case of perimeter shear, the average maximum forces for the top and bottom skin were 5.7 kN and 6.6 kN, respectively. For the panel with thicker skins (2 mm), the results were about 2 times higher.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7765912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77659122020-12-28 Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core Mogilski, Maciej Jabłoński, Maciej Deroszewska, Martyna Saraczyn, Robert Tracz, Jan Kowalik, Michał Rządkowski, Witold Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to measure the energy absorbed by composite panels with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) skins and a 5052 aluminum alloy honeycomb core and to compare it to previous research and isotropic material—two 25 × 1.75 mm 1.0562 alloy steel tubes. The panel skins layup consisted of pre-impregnated Pyrofil TR30S 210 gsm 3K 2 × 2 twill oriented in directions 0/90 and −45/45 and having a consolidated thickness of 1 mm or 2 mm. The core consisted of a 15 mm or 20 mm honeycomb oriented along its lengthwise direction. The first test consisted of a three-point bending of specimens supported at a span of 400 mm with a 50 mm radius tubular load applicator in the middle. Second, a perimeter shear test was conducted using a 25 mm diameter punch and a 38 mm diameter hole. The results of the three-point bending test show that the energy absorbed by panels with 1 mm skins was similar to the energy absorbed by the tubes (96 J), which was better than the previously considered panels. In the case of perimeter shear, the average maximum forces for the top and bottom skin were 5.7 kN and 6.6 kN, respectively. For the panel with thicker skins (2 mm), the results were about 2 times higher. MDPI 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7765912/ /pubmed/33352730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245807 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mogilski, Maciej
Jabłoński, Maciej
Deroszewska, Martyna
Saraczyn, Robert
Tracz, Jan
Kowalik, Michał
Rządkowski, Witold
Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title_full Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title_fullStr Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title_short Investigation of Energy Absorbed by Composite Panels with Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Core
title_sort investigation of energy absorbed by composite panels with honeycomb aluminum alloy core
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245807
work_keys_str_mv AT mogilskimaciej investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT jabłonskimaciej investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT deroszewskamartyna investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT saraczynrobert investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT traczjan investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT kowalikmichał investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore
AT rzadkowskiwitold investigationofenergyabsorbedbycompositepanelswithhoneycombaluminumalloycore