Cargando…
Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas
This study aimed to compare the achieved vault using a manufacturer’s nomogram and the predicted vault using the currently available prediction formulas after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (EVO Implantable Collamer Lens; ICL, STAAR Surgical) implantation. We included 200 eyes of 100 cons...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124090 |
_version_ | 1783628593740382208 |
---|---|
author | Ando, Wakako Kamiya, Kazutaka Hayakawa, Hideki Takahashi, Masahide Shoji, Nobuyuki |
author_facet | Ando, Wakako Kamiya, Kazutaka Hayakawa, Hideki Takahashi, Masahide Shoji, Nobuyuki |
author_sort | Ando, Wakako |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the achieved vault using a manufacturer’s nomogram and the predicted vault using the currently available prediction formulas after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (EVO Implantable Collamer Lens; ICL, STAAR Surgical) implantation. We included 200 eyes of 100 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 34.3 ± 7.8 years) undergoing ICL implantation with a central hole. Three months postoperatively, we quantitatively measured the actual vault, and we compared it with the predicted vault using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2, Tomey). The agreement rate of the recommended ICL size using the manufacturer’s nomogram, the NK formula, and the KS formula was 50.0%. The achieved vault was 477.1 ± 263.7 µm, which was significantly smaller than the predicted vaults of 551.2 ± 335.1 and 606.4 ± 212.2 µm, using the NK and KS formulas, respectively (Dunnett test, p = 0.014, p < 0.001). The achieved vault was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK or KS formula (p = 0.386, p = 0.157) when selecting a 12.1 mm ICL size. It was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK formula (p = 0.962), but it was significantly smaller than that using the KS formula (p = 0.033) when selecting a 12.6 mm size. It was significantly smaller than the predicted vault using the NK and KS formulas (p < 0.001) when selecting 13.2 mm size. The total agreement rate of the recommended ICL size was approximately 50%. The predicted ICL vault tended to overestimate the actual ICL vault, especially when selecting a larger ICL size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7765914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77659142020-12-28 Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas Ando, Wakako Kamiya, Kazutaka Hayakawa, Hideki Takahashi, Masahide Shoji, Nobuyuki J Clin Med Article This study aimed to compare the achieved vault using a manufacturer’s nomogram and the predicted vault using the currently available prediction formulas after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (EVO Implantable Collamer Lens; ICL, STAAR Surgical) implantation. We included 200 eyes of 100 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 34.3 ± 7.8 years) undergoing ICL implantation with a central hole. Three months postoperatively, we quantitatively measured the actual vault, and we compared it with the predicted vault using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2, Tomey). The agreement rate of the recommended ICL size using the manufacturer’s nomogram, the NK formula, and the KS formula was 50.0%. The achieved vault was 477.1 ± 263.7 µm, which was significantly smaller than the predicted vaults of 551.2 ± 335.1 and 606.4 ± 212.2 µm, using the NK and KS formulas, respectively (Dunnett test, p = 0.014, p < 0.001). The achieved vault was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK or KS formula (p = 0.386, p = 0.157) when selecting a 12.1 mm ICL size. It was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK formula (p = 0.962), but it was significantly smaller than that using the KS formula (p = 0.033) when selecting a 12.6 mm size. It was significantly smaller than the predicted vault using the NK and KS formulas (p < 0.001) when selecting 13.2 mm size. The total agreement rate of the recommended ICL size was approximately 50%. The predicted ICL vault tended to overestimate the actual ICL vault, especially when selecting a larger ICL size. MDPI 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7765914/ /pubmed/33352917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124090 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ando, Wakako Kamiya, Kazutaka Hayakawa, Hideki Takahashi, Masahide Shoji, Nobuyuki Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title | Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title_full | Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title_short | Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas |
title_sort | comparison of phakic intraocular lens vault using conventional nomogram and prediction formulas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andowakako comparisonofphakicintraocularlensvaultusingconventionalnomogramandpredictionformulas AT kamiyakazutaka comparisonofphakicintraocularlensvaultusingconventionalnomogramandpredictionformulas AT hayakawahideki comparisonofphakicintraocularlensvaultusingconventionalnomogramandpredictionformulas AT takahashimasahide comparisonofphakicintraocularlensvaultusingconventionalnomogramandpredictionformulas AT shojinobuyuki comparisonofphakicintraocularlensvaultusingconventionalnomogramandpredictionformulas |