Cargando…
Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer
Lymph node involvement has been shown to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors in a variety of malignancies; this is also true of endometrial cancer. The determination of the lymph node status is crucial in order to establish the tumor stage, and to consider adjuvant treatment. A wide range...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124107 |
_version_ | 1783628618543398912 |
---|---|
author | Freytag, Damaris Pape, Julian Dhanawat, Juhi Günther, Veronika Maass, Nicolai Gitas, Georgios Laganà, Antonio Simone Allahqoli, Leila Meinhold-Heerlein, Ivo Moawad, Gaby N. Biebl, Matthias Mettler, Liselotte Alkatout, Ibrahim |
author_facet | Freytag, Damaris Pape, Julian Dhanawat, Juhi Günther, Veronika Maass, Nicolai Gitas, Georgios Laganà, Antonio Simone Allahqoli, Leila Meinhold-Heerlein, Ivo Moawad, Gaby N. Biebl, Matthias Mettler, Liselotte Alkatout, Ibrahim |
author_sort | Freytag, Damaris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lymph node involvement has been shown to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors in a variety of malignancies; this is also true of endometrial cancer. The determination of the lymph node status is crucial in order to establish the tumor stage, and to consider adjuvant treatment. A wide range of surgical staging practices are currently used for the treatment of endometrial cancer. The necessity and extent of lymph node dissection is an ongoing controversial issue in gynecological oncology. Lymph node surgery in endometrial cancer is technically challenging, and can be time consuming because of the topographic complexity of lymphatic drainage as such, and the fact that the lymph nodes are directly adjacent to both blood vessels and nerves. Therefore, profound and exact knowledge of the anatomy is essential. Sentinel lymph node mapping was recently introduced in surgical staging with the aim of reducing morbidity, whilst also obtaining useful prognostic information from a patient’s lymph node status. The present review summarizes the current evidence on the role of lymph node surgery in endometrial cancer, focusing on the embryological, anatomical, and technical aspects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7766017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77660172020-12-28 Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer Freytag, Damaris Pape, Julian Dhanawat, Juhi Günther, Veronika Maass, Nicolai Gitas, Georgios Laganà, Antonio Simone Allahqoli, Leila Meinhold-Heerlein, Ivo Moawad, Gaby N. Biebl, Matthias Mettler, Liselotte Alkatout, Ibrahim J Clin Med Review Lymph node involvement has been shown to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors in a variety of malignancies; this is also true of endometrial cancer. The determination of the lymph node status is crucial in order to establish the tumor stage, and to consider adjuvant treatment. A wide range of surgical staging practices are currently used for the treatment of endometrial cancer. The necessity and extent of lymph node dissection is an ongoing controversial issue in gynecological oncology. Lymph node surgery in endometrial cancer is technically challenging, and can be time consuming because of the topographic complexity of lymphatic drainage as such, and the fact that the lymph nodes are directly adjacent to both blood vessels and nerves. Therefore, profound and exact knowledge of the anatomy is essential. Sentinel lymph node mapping was recently introduced in surgical staging with the aim of reducing morbidity, whilst also obtaining useful prognostic information from a patient’s lymph node status. The present review summarizes the current evidence on the role of lymph node surgery in endometrial cancer, focusing on the embryological, anatomical, and technical aspects. MDPI 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7766017/ /pubmed/33352762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124107 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Freytag, Damaris Pape, Julian Dhanawat, Juhi Günther, Veronika Maass, Nicolai Gitas, Georgios Laganà, Antonio Simone Allahqoli, Leila Meinhold-Heerlein, Ivo Moawad, Gaby N. Biebl, Matthias Mettler, Liselotte Alkatout, Ibrahim Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title | Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title_full | Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title_fullStr | Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title_short | Challenges Posed by Embryonic and Anatomical Factors in Systematic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer |
title_sort | challenges posed by embryonic and anatomical factors in systematic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33352762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freytagdamaris challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT papejulian challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT dhanawatjuhi challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT guntherveronika challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT maassnicolai challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT gitasgeorgios challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT laganaantoniosimone challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT allahqolileila challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT meinholdheerleinivo challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT moawadgabyn challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT bieblmatthias challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT mettlerliselotte challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer AT alkatoutibrahim challengesposedbyembryonicandanatomicalfactorsinsystematiclymphadenectomyforendometrialcancer |