Cargando…
Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies
Among “extra-criteria” antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, are considered a part of risk assessment strategies when investigating patients suspected of having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). aPL detection is currently performed by solid-phase...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120622 |
_version_ | 1783628636958490624 |
---|---|
author | Radin, Massimo Cecchi, Irene Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Rubini, Elena Barinotti, Alice Ramirez, Carlos Seaman, Andrea Roccatello, Dario Mahler, Michael Sciascia, Savino |
author_facet | Radin, Massimo Cecchi, Irene Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Rubini, Elena Barinotti, Alice Ramirez, Carlos Seaman, Andrea Roccatello, Dario Mahler, Michael Sciascia, Savino |
author_sort | Radin, Massimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Among “extra-criteria” antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, are considered a part of risk assessment strategies when investigating patients suspected of having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). aPL detection is currently performed by solid-phase assays to identify anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and aPS/PT antibodies, but new techniques are emerging. Among these, particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT), which allows the full automation and simultaneous digital detection of autoantibodies and proteins, including IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes of aCL, aβ2GPI and aPS/PT. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement of aPS/PT testing between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the PMAT platform. A total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study, including 71 patients with confirmed APS and 23 “aPL carriers”. aPS/PT IgG showed a moderate binomial agreement between ELISA and PMAT (k = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.75), and aPS/PT IgM showed a moderate agreement (k = 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.75). Moreover, when considering the continuous agreement, both aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed a statistically significant correlation between ELISA and PMAT (Spearman’s correlation = 0.69, p < 0.001 and 0.72, p < 0.001, respectively). This study demonstrates that PMAT technology is a reliable method for aPS/PT IgG and IgM testing when compared to the available commercial ELISA kit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7766094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77660942020-12-28 Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies Radin, Massimo Cecchi, Irene Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Rubini, Elena Barinotti, Alice Ramirez, Carlos Seaman, Andrea Roccatello, Dario Mahler, Michael Sciascia, Savino Biomedicines Article Among “extra-criteria” antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, are considered a part of risk assessment strategies when investigating patients suspected of having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). aPL detection is currently performed by solid-phase assays to identify anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and aPS/PT antibodies, but new techniques are emerging. Among these, particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT), which allows the full automation and simultaneous digital detection of autoantibodies and proteins, including IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes of aCL, aβ2GPI and aPS/PT. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement of aPS/PT testing between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the PMAT platform. A total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study, including 71 patients with confirmed APS and 23 “aPL carriers”. aPS/PT IgG showed a moderate binomial agreement between ELISA and PMAT (k = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.75), and aPS/PT IgM showed a moderate agreement (k = 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.75). Moreover, when considering the continuous agreement, both aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed a statistically significant correlation between ELISA and PMAT (Spearman’s correlation = 0.69, p < 0.001 and 0.72, p < 0.001, respectively). This study demonstrates that PMAT technology is a reliable method for aPS/PT IgG and IgM testing when compared to the available commercial ELISA kit. MDPI 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7766094/ /pubmed/33348782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120622 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Radin, Massimo Cecchi, Irene Foddai, Silvia Grazietta Rubini, Elena Barinotti, Alice Ramirez, Carlos Seaman, Andrea Roccatello, Dario Mahler, Michael Sciascia, Savino Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title | Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title_full | Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title_short | Validation of the Particle-Based Multi-Analyte Technology for Detection of Anti-PhosphatidylSerine/Prothrombin Antibodies |
title_sort | validation of the particle-based multi-analyte technology for detection of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radinmassimo validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT cecchiirene validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT foddaisilviagrazietta validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT rubinielena validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT barinottialice validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT ramirezcarlos validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT seamanandrea validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT roccatellodario validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT mahlermichael validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies AT sciasciasavino validationoftheparticlebasedmultianalytetechnologyfordetectionofantiphosphatidylserineprothrombinantibodies |