Cargando…
Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118 |
_version_ | 1783628638407622656 |
---|---|
author | Tagliari, Ana Paula Ferrari, Enrico Haager, Philipp K. Schmiady, Martin Oliver Vicentini, Luca Gavazzoni, Mara Gennari, Marco Jörg, Lucas Khattab, Ahmed Aziz Blöchlinger, Stefan Maisano, Francesco Taramasso, Maurizio |
author_facet | Tagliari, Ana Paula Ferrari, Enrico Haager, Philipp K. Schmiady, Martin Oliver Vicentini, Luca Gavazzoni, Mara Gennari, Marco Jörg, Lucas Khattab, Ahmed Aziz Blöchlinger, Stefan Maisano, Francesco Taramasso, Maurizio |
author_sort | Tagliari, Ana Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the Sentinel(TM) Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7766100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77661002020-12-28 Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy Tagliari, Ana Paula Ferrari, Enrico Haager, Philipp K. Schmiady, Martin Oliver Vicentini, Luca Gavazzoni, Mara Gennari, Marco Jörg, Lucas Khattab, Ahmed Aziz Blöchlinger, Stefan Maisano, Francesco Taramasso, Maurizio J Clin Med Article Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the Sentinel(TM) Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy. MDPI 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7766100/ /pubmed/33419286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tagliari, Ana Paula Ferrari, Enrico Haager, Philipp K. Schmiady, Martin Oliver Vicentini, Luca Gavazzoni, Mara Gennari, Marco Jörg, Lucas Khattab, Ahmed Aziz Blöchlinger, Stefan Maisano, Francesco Taramasso, Maurizio Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title | Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title_full | Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title_short | Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy |
title_sort | feasibility and safety of cerebral embolic protection device insertion in bovine aortic arch anatomy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagliarianapaula feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT ferrarienrico feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT haagerphilippk feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT schmiadymartinoliver feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT vicentiniluca feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT gavazzonimara feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT gennarimarco feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT jorglucas feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT khattabahmedaziz feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT blochlingerstefan feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT maisanofrancesco feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy AT taramassomaurizio feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy |