Cargando…

Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy

Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagliari, Ana Paula, Ferrari, Enrico, Haager, Philipp K., Schmiady, Martin Oliver, Vicentini, Luca, Gavazzoni, Mara, Gennari, Marco, Jörg, Lucas, Khattab, Ahmed Aziz, Blöchlinger, Stefan, Maisano, Francesco, Taramasso, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118
_version_ 1783628638407622656
author Tagliari, Ana Paula
Ferrari, Enrico
Haager, Philipp K.
Schmiady, Martin Oliver
Vicentini, Luca
Gavazzoni, Mara
Gennari, Marco
Jörg, Lucas
Khattab, Ahmed Aziz
Blöchlinger, Stefan
Maisano, Francesco
Taramasso, Maurizio
author_facet Tagliari, Ana Paula
Ferrari, Enrico
Haager, Philipp K.
Schmiady, Martin Oliver
Vicentini, Luca
Gavazzoni, Mara
Gennari, Marco
Jörg, Lucas
Khattab, Ahmed Aziz
Blöchlinger, Stefan
Maisano, Francesco
Taramasso, Maurizio
author_sort Tagliari, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the Sentinel(TM) Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7766100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77661002020-12-28 Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy Tagliari, Ana Paula Ferrari, Enrico Haager, Philipp K. Schmiady, Martin Oliver Vicentini, Luca Gavazzoni, Mara Gennari, Marco Jörg, Lucas Khattab, Ahmed Aziz Blöchlinger, Stefan Maisano, Francesco Taramasso, Maurizio J Clin Med Article Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the Sentinel(TM) Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy. MDPI 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7766100/ /pubmed/33419286 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tagliari, Ana Paula
Ferrari, Enrico
Haager, Philipp K.
Schmiady, Martin Oliver
Vicentini, Luca
Gavazzoni, Mara
Gennari, Marco
Jörg, Lucas
Khattab, Ahmed Aziz
Blöchlinger, Stefan
Maisano, Francesco
Taramasso, Maurizio
Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title_full Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title_fullStr Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title_short Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy
title_sort feasibility and safety of cerebral embolic protection device insertion in bovine aortic arch anatomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419286
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124118
work_keys_str_mv AT tagliarianapaula feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT ferrarienrico feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT haagerphilippk feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT schmiadymartinoliver feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT vicentiniluca feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT gavazzonimara feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT gennarimarco feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT jorglucas feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT khattabahmedaziz feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT blochlingerstefan feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT maisanofrancesco feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy
AT taramassomaurizio feasibilityandsafetyofcerebralembolicprotectiondeviceinsertioninbovineaorticarchanatomy