Cargando…

Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?

This study aimed to investigate sex difference in the functional movement in the adolescent period. Seven hundred and thirty adolescents (365 boys) aged 16–17 years participated in the study. The participants performed standardized Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS(TM)) protocol and a t-test was used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karuc, Josip, Jelčić, Mario, Sorić, Maroje, Mišigoj-Duraković, Marjeta, Marković, Goran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children7120308
_version_ 1783628832982433792
author Karuc, Josip
Jelčić, Mario
Sorić, Maroje
Mišigoj-Duraković, Marjeta
Marković, Goran
author_facet Karuc, Josip
Jelčić, Mario
Sorić, Maroje
Mišigoj-Duraković, Marjeta
Marković, Goran
author_sort Karuc, Josip
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate sex difference in the functional movement in the adolescent period. Seven hundred and thirty adolescents (365 boys) aged 16–17 years participated in the study. The participants performed standardized Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS(TM)) protocol and a t-test was used to examine sex differences in the total functional movement screen score, while the chi-square test was used to determine sex differences in the proportion of dysfunctional movement and movement asymmetries within the individual FMS(TM) tests. Girls demonstrated higher total FMS(TM) score compared to boys (12.7 ± 2.3 and 12.2 ± 2.4, respectively; p = 0.0054). Sex differences were present in several individual functional movement patterns where boys demonstrated higher prevalence of dysfunctional movement compared to girls in patterns that challenge mobility and flexibility of the body (inline lunge: 32% vs. 22%, df = 1, p = 0.0009; shoulder mobility: 47% vs. 26%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and active straight leg raise: 31% vs. 9%, df = 1, p < 0.0001), while girls underperformed in tests that have higher demands for upper-body strength and abdominal stabilization (trunk stability push-up: 81% vs. 44%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and rotary stability: 54% vs. 44%, df = 1, p = 0.0075). Findings of this study suggest that sex dimorphisms exist in functional movement patterns in the period of mid-adolescence. The results of this research need to be considered while using FMS(TM) as a screening tool, as well as the reference standard for exercise intervention among the secondary school-aged population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7766915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77669152020-12-28 Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence? Karuc, Josip Jelčić, Mario Sorić, Maroje Mišigoj-Duraković, Marjeta Marković, Goran Children (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate sex difference in the functional movement in the adolescent period. Seven hundred and thirty adolescents (365 boys) aged 16–17 years participated in the study. The participants performed standardized Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS(TM)) protocol and a t-test was used to examine sex differences in the total functional movement screen score, while the chi-square test was used to determine sex differences in the proportion of dysfunctional movement and movement asymmetries within the individual FMS(TM) tests. Girls demonstrated higher total FMS(TM) score compared to boys (12.7 ± 2.3 and 12.2 ± 2.4, respectively; p = 0.0054). Sex differences were present in several individual functional movement patterns where boys demonstrated higher prevalence of dysfunctional movement compared to girls in patterns that challenge mobility and flexibility of the body (inline lunge: 32% vs. 22%, df = 1, p = 0.0009; shoulder mobility: 47% vs. 26%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and active straight leg raise: 31% vs. 9%, df = 1, p < 0.0001), while girls underperformed in tests that have higher demands for upper-body strength and abdominal stabilization (trunk stability push-up: 81% vs. 44%, df = 1, p < 0.0001; and rotary stability: 54% vs. 44%, df = 1, p = 0.0075). Findings of this study suggest that sex dimorphisms exist in functional movement patterns in the period of mid-adolescence. The results of this research need to be considered while using FMS(TM) as a screening tool, as well as the reference standard for exercise intervention among the secondary school-aged population. MDPI 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7766915/ /pubmed/33419279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children7120308 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Karuc, Josip
Jelčić, Mario
Sorić, Maroje
Mišigoj-Duraković, Marjeta
Marković, Goran
Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title_full Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title_fullStr Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title_full_unstemmed Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title_short Does Sex Dimorphism Exist in Dysfunctional Movement Patterns during the Sensitive Period of Adolescence?
title_sort does sex dimorphism exist in dysfunctional movement patterns during the sensitive period of adolescence?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children7120308
work_keys_str_mv AT karucjosip doessexdimorphismexistindysfunctionalmovementpatternsduringthesensitiveperiodofadolescence
AT jelcicmario doessexdimorphismexistindysfunctionalmovementpatternsduringthesensitiveperiodofadolescence
AT soricmaroje doessexdimorphismexistindysfunctionalmovementpatternsduringthesensitiveperiodofadolescence
AT misigojdurakovicmarjeta doessexdimorphismexistindysfunctionalmovementpatternsduringthesensitiveperiodofadolescence
AT markovicgoran doessexdimorphismexistindysfunctionalmovementpatternsduringthesensitiveperiodofadolescence