Cargando…

Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review

This systematic review analyses the contribution of metabolomics to the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for uterine diseases. These diseases are diagnosed invasively, which entails delayed treatment and a worse clinical outcome. New options for diagnosis and prognosis are need...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tokarz, Janina, Adamski, Jerzy, Lanišnik Rižner, Tea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040294
_version_ 1783628964300849152
author Tokarz, Janina
Adamski, Jerzy
Lanišnik Rižner, Tea
author_facet Tokarz, Janina
Adamski, Jerzy
Lanišnik Rižner, Tea
author_sort Tokarz, Janina
collection PubMed
description This systematic review analyses the contribution of metabolomics to the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for uterine diseases. These diseases are diagnosed invasively, which entails delayed treatment and a worse clinical outcome. New options for diagnosis and prognosis are needed. PubMed, OVID, and Scopus were searched for research papers on metabolomics in physiological fluids and tissues from patients with uterine diseases. The search identified 484 records. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 44 studies were included into the review. Relevant data were extracted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) checklist and quality was assessed using the QUADOMICS tool. The selected metabolomics studies analysed plasma, serum, urine, peritoneal, endometrial, and cervico-vaginal fluid, ectopic/eutopic endometrium, and cervical tissue. In endometriosis, diagnostic models discriminated patients from healthy and infertile controls. In cervical cancer, diagnostic algorithms discriminated patients from controls, patients with good/bad prognosis, and with/without response to chemotherapy. In endometrial cancer, several models stratified patients from controls and recurrent from non-recurrent patients. Metabolomics is valuable for constructing diagnostic models. However, the majority of studies were in the discovery phase and require additional research to select reliable biomarkers for validation and translation into clinical practice. This review identifies bottlenecks that currently prevent the translation of these findings into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7767462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77674622020-12-28 Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review Tokarz, Janina Adamski, Jerzy Lanišnik Rižner, Tea J Pers Med Review This systematic review analyses the contribution of metabolomics to the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for uterine diseases. These diseases are diagnosed invasively, which entails delayed treatment and a worse clinical outcome. New options for diagnosis and prognosis are needed. PubMed, OVID, and Scopus were searched for research papers on metabolomics in physiological fluids and tissues from patients with uterine diseases. The search identified 484 records. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 44 studies were included into the review. Relevant data were extracted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) checklist and quality was assessed using the QUADOMICS tool. The selected metabolomics studies analysed plasma, serum, urine, peritoneal, endometrial, and cervico-vaginal fluid, ectopic/eutopic endometrium, and cervical tissue. In endometriosis, diagnostic models discriminated patients from healthy and infertile controls. In cervical cancer, diagnostic algorithms discriminated patients from controls, patients with good/bad prognosis, and with/without response to chemotherapy. In endometrial cancer, several models stratified patients from controls and recurrent from non-recurrent patients. Metabolomics is valuable for constructing diagnostic models. However, the majority of studies were in the discovery phase and require additional research to select reliable biomarkers for validation and translation into clinical practice. This review identifies bottlenecks that currently prevent the translation of these findings into clinical practice. MDPI 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7767462/ /pubmed/33371433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040294 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tokarz, Janina
Adamski, Jerzy
Lanišnik Rižner, Tea
Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title_full Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title_short Metabolomics for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Diseases? A Systematic Review
title_sort metabolomics for diagnosis and prognosis of uterine diseases? a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040294
work_keys_str_mv AT tokarzjanina metabolomicsfordiagnosisandprognosisofuterinediseasesasystematicreview
AT adamskijerzy metabolomicsfordiagnosisandprognosisofuterinediseasesasystematicreview
AT lanisnikriznertea metabolomicsfordiagnosisandprognosisofuterinediseasesasystematicreview