Cargando…

Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars

The use of sustainable materials is a challenging issue for the construction industry; thus, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) is of interest to civil and structural engineers for their lightweight and high-strength properties. The paper describes the results of tensile and shear strength testing of B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Protchenko, Kostiantyn, Zayoud, Fares, Urbański, Marek, Szmigiera, Elżbieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245839
_version_ 1783628967212744704
author Protchenko, Kostiantyn
Zayoud, Fares
Urbański, Marek
Szmigiera, Elżbieta
author_facet Protchenko, Kostiantyn
Zayoud, Fares
Urbański, Marek
Szmigiera, Elżbieta
author_sort Protchenko, Kostiantyn
collection PubMed
description The use of sustainable materials is a challenging issue for the construction industry; thus, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) is of interest to civil and structural engineers for their lightweight and high-strength properties. The paper describes the results of tensile and shear strength testing of Basalt FRP (BFRP) and Hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars. The combination of carbon fibers and basalt fibers leads to a more cost-efficient alternative to Carbon FRP (CFRP) and a more sustainable alternative to BFRP. The bars were subjected to both tensile and shear strength testing in order to investigate their structural behavior and find a correlation between the results. The results of the tests done on BFRP and HFRP bars showed that the mechanical properties of BFRP bars were lower than for HFRP bars. The maximum tensile strength obtained for a BFRP bar with a diameter of 10 mm was equal to approximately 1150 MPa, whereas for HFRP bars with a diameter of 8 mm, it was higher, approximately 1280 MPa. Additionally, better results were obtained for HFRP bars during shear testing; the average maximum shear stress was equal to 214 MPa, which was approximately 22% higher than the average maximum shear stress obtained for BFRP bars. However, HFRP bars exhibited the lowest shear strain of 57% that of BFRP bars. This confirms the effectiveness of using HFRP bars as a replacement for less rigid BFRP bars. It is worth mentioning that after obtaining these results, shear testing can be performed instead of tensile testing for future studies, which is less complicated and takes less time to prepare than tensile testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7767474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77674742020-12-28 Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars Protchenko, Kostiantyn Zayoud, Fares Urbański, Marek Szmigiera, Elżbieta Materials (Basel) Article The use of sustainable materials is a challenging issue for the construction industry; thus, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) is of interest to civil and structural engineers for their lightweight and high-strength properties. The paper describes the results of tensile and shear strength testing of Basalt FRP (BFRP) and Hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars. The combination of carbon fibers and basalt fibers leads to a more cost-efficient alternative to Carbon FRP (CFRP) and a more sustainable alternative to BFRP. The bars were subjected to both tensile and shear strength testing in order to investigate their structural behavior and find a correlation between the results. The results of the tests done on BFRP and HFRP bars showed that the mechanical properties of BFRP bars were lower than for HFRP bars. The maximum tensile strength obtained for a BFRP bar with a diameter of 10 mm was equal to approximately 1150 MPa, whereas for HFRP bars with a diameter of 8 mm, it was higher, approximately 1280 MPa. Additionally, better results were obtained for HFRP bars during shear testing; the average maximum shear stress was equal to 214 MPa, which was approximately 22% higher than the average maximum shear stress obtained for BFRP bars. However, HFRP bars exhibited the lowest shear strain of 57% that of BFRP bars. This confirms the effectiveness of using HFRP bars as a replacement for less rigid BFRP bars. It is worth mentioning that after obtaining these results, shear testing can be performed instead of tensile testing for future studies, which is less complicated and takes less time to prepare than tensile testing. MDPI 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7767474/ /pubmed/33371416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245839 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Protchenko, Kostiantyn
Zayoud, Fares
Urbański, Marek
Szmigiera, Elżbieta
Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title_full Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title_fullStr Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title_full_unstemmed Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title_short Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars
title_sort tensile and shear testing of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (bfrp) and hybrid basalt/carbon fiber reinforced polymer (hfrp) bars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13245839
work_keys_str_mv AT protchenkokostiantyn tensileandsheartestingofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbfrpandhybridbasaltcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymerhfrpbars
AT zayoudfares tensileandsheartestingofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbfrpandhybridbasaltcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymerhfrpbars
AT urbanskimarek tensileandsheartestingofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbfrpandhybridbasaltcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymerhfrpbars
AT szmigieraelzbieta tensileandsheartestingofbasaltfiberreinforcedpolymerbfrpandhybridbasaltcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymerhfrpbars