Influence of the Treatment Used in Inflammatory Bowel Disease on the Protease Activities

INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence that intestinal proteases have a role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), has an additional source of proteases represented by infiltrated and activated inflammatory cells. The aim of our study was to determine proteolytic system activity in patients with CD and UC. We limited the number of proteases tested by determining proteases active in acidic, neutral and alkaline pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients with IBD – 20 CD patients and 20 UC patients. The control group consisted of 20 healthy subjects. Among the 20 CD patients, 17 were treated with aminosalicylates, 14 with azathioprine, and 4 with corticosteroids, while 8 patients were undergoing biological treatment. Among the 20 UC patients, 19 were treated with aminosalicylates, 8 with azathioprine, and 3 with corticosteroids. The total protein concentration was assayed by the Lowry method. The optimal pH was assayed in pH from 2.2 to 12.8, separated by 0.2 intervals. Proteolytic activities were determined against different substrates (gelatine, haemoglobin, ovalbumin, albumin, cytochrome C, and casein), and haemoglobin was the optimal substrate. Protease activities were determined according to Anson method. Determination of the activities of natural inhibitors of acidic, neutral and alkaline proteases is based on the Lee and Lin method. RESULTS: Decreases were observed in the activities of acid proteases (pH 5), alkaline proteases (pH 7), and neutral proteases (pH 7.6 and 8.6) in the groups of CD patients in remission in comparison with the active phase. In the group of patients with biologically treated CD patients, acid protease activity (pH 5.0) was lower than in CD patients not receiving biological treatment. Activities of neutral (pH 7.0) and alkaline (pH 7.6 and 8.6) proteases in the plasma of patients with UC in remission were lower in comparison to the active phase. Activities of acid (pH 5.0) and alkaline (8.6) protease inhibitors were higher in CD patients in the active phase in comparison to remission. In UC patients with exacerbation of the disease, the activity of alkaline (pH 8.6) protease inhibitors was increased compared to remission. CONCLUSION: 1. Our research may suggest that the immunomodulatory treatment used in IBD, aimed at reducing the level of leukocytes and reduction of inflammation, may contribute to a reduction in protease activity. 2. The decrease of protease activities in patients with CD and UC in remission may be a marker suggesting the patients’ response to the treatment.