The Assessment of Paravertebral Ossification Progression After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Based on CT Images: A Long‐term Follow‐up

OBJECTIVE: This study focused on the assessment of paravertebral ossification (PO) after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) using computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 52 patients (from 2004 to 2010) who received CDA at a single center were included (32 males). Preoperative and follow‐up X‐ray and CT images of all patients who underwent single‐level CDA were collected. PO from the C2/3 to C7/T1 in each patient was graded based on a CT grading system. Each segment was divided into operative level, adjacent level, or non‐adjacent level. The McAfee' classification system was used to grade PO using X‐ray plain film. The range of motion (ROM) and scores of neurological symptoms (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) at both preoperative and final follow‐up time were acquired. Progression and classification of PO in each group was compared using the chi‐square test. ROM between groups were compared using independent t‐test. JOA score and NDI between groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. RESULTS: The average follow‐up time was 81.2 months. In comparison with the preoperative status, the progression of PO development in left and right areas (the Luschka joints areas) in the operative level groups was significantly more severe (area L,χ(2) value = 36.612, P < 0.001; area R, χ(2) value = 39.172, P < 0.001) than the non‐adjacent level groups. In contrast, although the prevalence of PO in all areas of the adjacent level groups was higher than that of the non‐adjacent level group in the same segments, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the progression of PO development. The follow‐up high‐grade (grades III and IV) PO incidence rate using X‐ray grading system (3.85%) was significantly lower than that using CT grading system in area L (42.31%) and R (38.46%), but close to that in area A (5.77%) and P (1.92%). The final follow‐up ROM was not significantly different with preoperative ROM in patients with low‐grade PO (9.47° ± 4.12° vs. 9.76° ± 3.69°, P = 0.794). However, in patients with high‐grade PO, the final follow‐up ROM was significantly lower than preoperative ROM (5.77° ± 3.32° vs. 9.28° ± 4.15°, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference for JOA score and NDI at follow‐up between patients with high‐grade and low‐grade PO (JOA, 16.2 ± 1.1 vs. 16.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.489; NDI, 8.9 ± 6.1 vs. 8.0 ± 7.3, P = 0.317). CONCLUSION: High‐grade PO was observed in the areas of the Luschka joints at the operative level after CDA, which was difficult to observe using X‐ray plain film. The PO formation at adjacent segments was not significant.