Cargando…

Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial

PURPOSE: Lymphedema associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) therapy causes adverse clinical outcomes. Standard treatment includes professionally administered complete decongestive therapy (CDT). Cost and availability of trained therapists are known barriers to therapy. Advanced pneumatic compress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridner, Sheila H., Dietrich, Mary S., Deng, Jie, Ettema, Sandra L., Murphy, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32488435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8
_version_ 1783629063888306176
author Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Deng, Jie
Ettema, Sandra L.
Murphy, Barbara
author_facet Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Deng, Jie
Ettema, Sandra L.
Murphy, Barbara
author_sort Ridner, Sheila H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lymphedema associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) therapy causes adverse clinical outcomes. Standard treatment includes professionally administered complete decongestive therapy (CDT). Cost and availability of trained therapists are known barriers to therapy. Advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCD) may address these issues. A randomized, wait-list controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate an APCD in post-treatment HNC patients with lymphedema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients had completed treatment for HNC, were disease free, and had lymphedema at enrollment. Participants were randomized to wait-list lymphedema self-management (standard of care) or lymphedema self-management plus the use of the APCD bid. Safety (CTCAE V4.0) and feasibility were primary endpoints; secondary endpoints included efficacy measure by objective examination and patient reported outcomes (symptoms, quality of life, function), adherence barriers, and satisfaction. Assessments were conducted at baseline and weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled (wait-list n = 25; intervention n = 24). In total, forty-three patients completed the study. No device-related Serious Adverse Events were reported. Most patients used the APCD once per day, instead of the prescribed twice per day, citing time related factors as barriers to use. APCD use was associated with significant improvement in perceived ability to control lymphedema (p = 0.003) and visible external swelling (front view p < 0.001, right view p = 0.004, left p = 0.005), as well as less reported pain. CONCLUSION: This trial supports the safety and feasibility of the APCD for the treatment of secondary lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients. In addition, preliminary data supports efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7767900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77679002020-12-29 Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Deng, Jie Ettema, Sandra L. Murphy, Barbara Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Lymphedema associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) therapy causes adverse clinical outcomes. Standard treatment includes professionally administered complete decongestive therapy (CDT). Cost and availability of trained therapists are known barriers to therapy. Advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCD) may address these issues. A randomized, wait-list controlled trial was undertaken to evaluate an APCD in post-treatment HNC patients with lymphedema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients had completed treatment for HNC, were disease free, and had lymphedema at enrollment. Participants were randomized to wait-list lymphedema self-management (standard of care) or lymphedema self-management plus the use of the APCD bid. Safety (CTCAE V4.0) and feasibility were primary endpoints; secondary endpoints included efficacy measure by objective examination and patient reported outcomes (symptoms, quality of life, function), adherence barriers, and satisfaction. Assessments were conducted at baseline and weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled (wait-list n = 25; intervention n = 24). In total, forty-three patients completed the study. No device-related Serious Adverse Events were reported. Most patients used the APCD once per day, instead of the prescribed twice per day, citing time related factors as barriers to use. APCD use was associated with significant improvement in perceived ability to control lymphedema (p = 0.003) and visible external swelling (front view p < 0.001, right view p = 0.004, left p = 0.005), as well as less reported pain. CONCLUSION: This trial supports the safety and feasibility of the APCD for the treatment of secondary lymphedema in head and neck cancer patients. In addition, preliminary data supports efficacy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7767900/ /pubmed/32488435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Deng, Jie
Ettema, Sandra L.
Murphy, Barbara
Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title_full Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title_fullStr Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title_short Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
title_sort advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32488435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ridnersheilah advancedpneumaticcompressionfortreatmentoflymphedemaoftheheadandneckarandomizedwaitlistcontrolledtrial
AT dietrichmarys advancedpneumaticcompressionfortreatmentoflymphedemaoftheheadandneckarandomizedwaitlistcontrolledtrial
AT dengjie advancedpneumaticcompressionfortreatmentoflymphedemaoftheheadandneckarandomizedwaitlistcontrolledtrial
AT ettemasandral advancedpneumaticcompressionfortreatmentoflymphedemaoftheheadandneckarandomizedwaitlistcontrolledtrial
AT murphybarbara advancedpneumaticcompressionfortreatmentoflymphedemaoftheheadandneckarandomizedwaitlistcontrolledtrial