Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare once daily (QD) usage of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin in patients divided as those with moderate and with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) according to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) categories in terms of effectiveness and adve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gul, Abdullah, Coban, Soner, Turkoglu, Ali Riza, Guzelsoy, Muhammet, Ozturk, Murat, Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.04.002
_version_ 1783629073286692864
author Gul, Abdullah
Coban, Soner
Turkoglu, Ali Riza
Guzelsoy, Muhammet
Ozturk, Murat
Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir
author_facet Gul, Abdullah
Coban, Soner
Turkoglu, Ali Riza
Guzelsoy, Muhammet
Ozturk, Murat
Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir
author_sort Gul, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare once daily (QD) usage of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin in patients divided as those with moderate and with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) according to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) categories in terms of effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS: A total of 234 patients aged ≥ 40 years were evaluated prospectively. All participants were divided firstly into two groups according to their IPSS severity as moderate and severe. They were further allocated to receive 4 mg of silodosin and 8 mg of silodosin QD. Demographic features and laboratory tests were recorded. The patients were questioned with International Index of Erectile Function-5 and IPSS along with quality of life index. Uroflowmetric measurements were applied to the patients. All tests and measurements were repeated at the 3rd month, and changes from pretreatment to posttreatment were analyzed by SPSS 21.0 Program. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Both treatments provided benefit in patients with both moderate and severe LUTSs. While results did not differ among 4 mg and 8 mg of silodosin in patients with moderate LUTSs, 8 mg of silodosin was significantly better than 4mg in those with severe LUTSs in terms of improvement of the total IPSS, IPSS voiding subtotal score, and quality of life score (p = 0.015, 0.030, <0.001, respectively). Both treatments did not affect erectile functions. Adverse events were seen more frequently in patients receiving 8 mg of silodosin than those treated with 4 mg of silodosin (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that 4 mg of silodosin QD was as effective as 8 mg of silodosin QD in patients with moderate LUTSs but not with severe LUTSs. It can be inferred from this study that prescription of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin may be chosen to treat the patients with moderate and severe LUTSs due to benign prostatic heperplasia, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7767940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77679402021-01-07 Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity Gul, Abdullah Coban, Soner Turkoglu, Ali Riza Guzelsoy, Muhammet Ozturk, Murat Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir Prostate Int Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare once daily (QD) usage of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin in patients divided as those with moderate and with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) according to International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) categories in terms of effectiveness and adverse events. METHODS: A total of 234 patients aged ≥ 40 years were evaluated prospectively. All participants were divided firstly into two groups according to their IPSS severity as moderate and severe. They were further allocated to receive 4 mg of silodosin and 8 mg of silodosin QD. Demographic features and laboratory tests were recorded. The patients were questioned with International Index of Erectile Function-5 and IPSS along with quality of life index. Uroflowmetric measurements were applied to the patients. All tests and measurements were repeated at the 3rd month, and changes from pretreatment to posttreatment were analyzed by SPSS 21.0 Program. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Both treatments provided benefit in patients with both moderate and severe LUTSs. While results did not differ among 4 mg and 8 mg of silodosin in patients with moderate LUTSs, 8 mg of silodosin was significantly better than 4mg in those with severe LUTSs in terms of improvement of the total IPSS, IPSS voiding subtotal score, and quality of life score (p = 0.015, 0.030, <0.001, respectively). Both treatments did not affect erectile functions. Adverse events were seen more frequently in patients receiving 8 mg of silodosin than those treated with 4 mg of silodosin (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that 4 mg of silodosin QD was as effective as 8 mg of silodosin QD in patients with moderate LUTSs but not with severe LUTSs. It can be inferred from this study that prescription of 4 and 8 mg of silodosin may be chosen to treat the patients with moderate and severe LUTSs due to benign prostatic heperplasia, respectively. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2020-12 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7767940/ /pubmed/33425792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.04.002 Text en © 2020 Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gul, Abdullah
Coban, Soner
Turkoglu, Ali Riza
Guzelsoy, Muhammet
Ozturk, Murat
Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir
Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to International Prostate Symptom Score severity
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety profile of 4 vs 8 mg of silodosin once daily usage in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms divided into subgroups according to international prostate symptom score severity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33425792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT gulabdullah comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity
AT cobansoner comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity
AT turkoglualiriza comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity
AT guzelsoymuhammet comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity
AT ozturkmurat comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity
AT kankilicnazimabdulkadir comparativeefficacyandsafetyprofileof4vs8mgofsilodosinoncedailyusageinpatientswithbenignprostatichyperplasiarelatedlowerurinarytractsymptomsdividedintosubgroupsaccordingtointernationalprostatesymptomscoreseverity