Cargando…

Whom to Believe? Understanding and Modeling Brain Activity in Source Credibility Evaluation

Understanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Source credibility is among the most important aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand source credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of human...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawiak, Andrzej, Wojcik, Grzegorz M., Schneider, Piotr, Kwasniewicz, Lukasz, Wierzbicki, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2020.607853
Descripción
Sumario:Understanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Source credibility is among the most important aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand source credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of humans performing credibility evaluations. Nevertheless, source credibility has never been investigated using such a method before. This article reports the results of an experiment during which we have measured brain activity during source credibility evaluation, using EEG. The experiment allowed for identification of brain areas that were active when a participant made positive or negative source credibility evaluations. Based on experimental data, we modeled and predicted human source credibility evaluations using EEG brain activity measurements with F1 score exceeding 0.7 (using 10-fold cross-validation).