Cargando…

Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week

OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Møller, Jakob Møllenbach, Østergaard, Mikkel, Thomsen, Henrik S, Hangaard, Stine, Sørensen, Inge J, Madsen, Ole Rintek, Pedersen, Susanne J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements using four different region of interest (ROI) settings. METHODS: In this prospective study, the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) of 25 patients with axSpA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were imaged twice at a mean interval of 6.8 days in a 1.5 T scanner using, multishot echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences. ADCs at four ROI settings were assessed: 5 mm and 10 mm anatomic band-shaped, 15 mm linear, and 40 mm(2) circular. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments showed that the interstudy repeatability was good for median ADC (ADC(med)) and 95th-percentile ADC (ADC(95)) measurements in patients with axSpA (0.77–0.83 and 0.75–0.83, respectively), but poor-to-moderate in healthy subjects (0.27–0.55 and 0.13–0.37, respectively). For all ROI settings, intrareader reproducibility was excellent for ADC(med)-measurements (ICC:0.85–0.99) and moderate-to-excellent for ADC(95) measurements (ICC:0.68–0.96). The 5 mm ROI had the least estimated bias and highest level of agreement on Bland–Altman plots. The interreader reproducibility was moderate (ICC:0.71). The 15 mm linear ROI produced significantly greater ADC(med) and ADC(95) measurements than all other ROI settings (p < 0.01–0.02), except for the circular ROI ADC(95) measurements. CONCLUSION: ROI settings influence ADC measurements. Interstudy repeatability of SIJ ADC measurements is independent of ROI settings. However, the 5 mm ROI showed the least bias and random error and seems preferable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements are affected by ROI settings, and this should be taken into account when assessing ADC maps.