Cargando…
Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004 |
_version_ | 1783629149121806336 |
---|---|
author | Møller, Jakob Møllenbach Østergaard, Mikkel Thomsen, Henrik S Hangaard, Stine Sørensen, Inge J Madsen, Ole Rintek Pedersen, Susanne J |
author_facet | Møller, Jakob Møllenbach Østergaard, Mikkel Thomsen, Henrik S Hangaard, Stine Sørensen, Inge J Madsen, Ole Rintek Pedersen, Susanne J |
author_sort | Møller, Jakob Møllenbach |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements using four different region of interest (ROI) settings. METHODS: In this prospective study, the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) of 25 patients with axSpA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were imaged twice at a mean interval of 6.8 days in a 1.5 T scanner using, multishot echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences. ADCs at four ROI settings were assessed: 5 mm and 10 mm anatomic band-shaped, 15 mm linear, and 40 mm(2) circular. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments showed that the interstudy repeatability was good for median ADC (ADC(med)) and 95th-percentile ADC (ADC(95)) measurements in patients with axSpA (0.77–0.83 and 0.75–0.83, respectively), but poor-to-moderate in healthy subjects (0.27–0.55 and 0.13–0.37, respectively). For all ROI settings, intrareader reproducibility was excellent for ADC(med)-measurements (ICC:0.85–0.99) and moderate-to-excellent for ADC(95) measurements (ICC:0.68–0.96). The 5 mm ROI had the least estimated bias and highest level of agreement on Bland–Altman plots. The interreader reproducibility was moderate (ICC:0.71). The 15 mm linear ROI produced significantly greater ADC(med) and ADC(95) measurements than all other ROI settings (p < 0.01–0.02), except for the circular ROI ADC(95) measurements. CONCLUSION: ROI settings influence ADC measurements. Interstudy repeatability of SIJ ADC measurements is independent of ROI settings. However, the 5 mm ROI showed the least bias and random error and seems preferable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements are affected by ROI settings, and this should be taken into account when assessing ADC maps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7768406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77684062021-01-05 Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week Møller, Jakob Møllenbach Østergaard, Mikkel Thomsen, Henrik S Hangaard, Stine Sørensen, Inge J Madsen, Ole Rintek Pedersen, Susanne J BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements using four different region of interest (ROI) settings. METHODS: In this prospective study, the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) of 25 patients with axSpA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were imaged twice at a mean interval of 6.8 days in a 1.5 T scanner using, multishot echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences. ADCs at four ROI settings were assessed: 5 mm and 10 mm anatomic band-shaped, 15 mm linear, and 40 mm(2) circular. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments showed that the interstudy repeatability was good for median ADC (ADC(med)) and 95th-percentile ADC (ADC(95)) measurements in patients with axSpA (0.77–0.83 and 0.75–0.83, respectively), but poor-to-moderate in healthy subjects (0.27–0.55 and 0.13–0.37, respectively). For all ROI settings, intrareader reproducibility was excellent for ADC(med)-measurements (ICC:0.85–0.99) and moderate-to-excellent for ADC(95) measurements (ICC:0.68–0.96). The 5 mm ROI had the least estimated bias and highest level of agreement on Bland–Altman plots. The interreader reproducibility was moderate (ICC:0.71). The 15 mm linear ROI produced significantly greater ADC(med) and ADC(95) measurements than all other ROI settings (p < 0.01–0.02), except for the circular ROI ADC(95) measurements. CONCLUSION: ROI settings influence ADC measurements. Interstudy repeatability of SIJ ADC measurements is independent of ROI settings. However, the 5 mm ROI showed the least bias and random error and seems preferable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements are affected by ROI settings, and this should be taken into account when assessing ADC maps. The British Institute of Radiology. 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7768406/ /pubmed/33409446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Møller, Jakob Møllenbach Østergaard, Mikkel Thomsen, Henrik S Hangaard, Stine Sørensen, Inge J Madsen, Ole Rintek Pedersen, Susanne J Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title | Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title_full | Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title_fullStr | Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title_short | Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
title_sort | repeatability and reproducibility of mri apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT møllerjakobmøllenbach repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT østergaardmikkel repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT thomsenhenriks repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT hangaardstine repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT sørenseningej repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT madsenolerintek repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek AT pedersensusannej repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek |