Cargando…

Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week

OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Møller, Jakob Møllenbach, Østergaard, Mikkel, Thomsen, Henrik S, Hangaard, Stine, Sørensen, Inge J, Madsen, Ole Rintek, Pedersen, Susanne J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004
_version_ 1783629149121806336
author Møller, Jakob Møllenbach
Østergaard, Mikkel
Thomsen, Henrik S
Hangaard, Stine
Sørensen, Inge J
Madsen, Ole Rintek
Pedersen, Susanne J
author_facet Møller, Jakob Møllenbach
Østergaard, Mikkel
Thomsen, Henrik S
Hangaard, Stine
Sørensen, Inge J
Madsen, Ole Rintek
Pedersen, Susanne J
author_sort Møller, Jakob Møllenbach
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements using four different region of interest (ROI) settings. METHODS: In this prospective study, the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) of 25 patients with axSpA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were imaged twice at a mean interval of 6.8 days in a 1.5 T scanner using, multishot echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences. ADCs at four ROI settings were assessed: 5 mm and 10 mm anatomic band-shaped, 15 mm linear, and 40 mm(2) circular. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments showed that the interstudy repeatability was good for median ADC (ADC(med)) and 95th-percentile ADC (ADC(95)) measurements in patients with axSpA (0.77–0.83 and 0.75–0.83, respectively), but poor-to-moderate in healthy subjects (0.27–0.55 and 0.13–0.37, respectively). For all ROI settings, intrareader reproducibility was excellent for ADC(med)-measurements (ICC:0.85–0.99) and moderate-to-excellent for ADC(95) measurements (ICC:0.68–0.96). The 5 mm ROI had the least estimated bias and highest level of agreement on Bland–Altman plots. The interreader reproducibility was moderate (ICC:0.71). The 15 mm linear ROI produced significantly greater ADC(med) and ADC(95) measurements than all other ROI settings (p < 0.01–0.02), except for the circular ROI ADC(95) measurements. CONCLUSION: ROI settings influence ADC measurements. Interstudy repeatability of SIJ ADC measurements is independent of ROI settings. However, the 5 mm ROI showed the least bias and random error and seems preferable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements are affected by ROI settings, and this should be taken into account when assessing ADC maps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7768406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77684062021-01-05 Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week Møller, Jakob Møllenbach Østergaard, Mikkel Thomsen, Henrik S Hangaard, Stine Sørensen, Inge J Madsen, Ole Rintek Pedersen, Susanne J BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) may be used as a biomarker for diagnosis and/or monitoring treatment response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but this requires reliable ADC measurements. This study assessed test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measurements using four different region of interest (ROI) settings. METHODS: In this prospective study, the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) of 25 patients with axSpA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were imaged twice at a mean interval of 6.8 days in a 1.5 T scanner using, multishot echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences. ADCs at four ROI settings were assessed: 5 mm and 10 mm anatomic band-shaped, 15 mm linear, and 40 mm(2) circular. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessments showed that the interstudy repeatability was good for median ADC (ADC(med)) and 95th-percentile ADC (ADC(95)) measurements in patients with axSpA (0.77–0.83 and 0.75–0.83, respectively), but poor-to-moderate in healthy subjects (0.27–0.55 and 0.13–0.37, respectively). For all ROI settings, intrareader reproducibility was excellent for ADC(med)-measurements (ICC:0.85–0.99) and moderate-to-excellent for ADC(95) measurements (ICC:0.68–0.96). The 5 mm ROI had the least estimated bias and highest level of agreement on Bland–Altman plots. The interreader reproducibility was moderate (ICC:0.71). The 15 mm linear ROI produced significantly greater ADC(med) and ADC(95) measurements than all other ROI settings (p < 0.01–0.02), except for the circular ROI ADC(95) measurements. CONCLUSION: ROI settings influence ADC measurements. Interstudy repeatability of SIJ ADC measurements is independent of ROI settings. However, the 5 mm ROI showed the least bias and random error and seems preferable. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: ADC measurements are affected by ROI settings, and this should be taken into account when assessing ADC maps. The British Institute of Radiology. 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7768406/ /pubmed/33409446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Møller, Jakob Møllenbach
Østergaard, Mikkel
Thomsen, Henrik S
Hangaard, Stine
Sørensen, Inge J
Madsen, Ole Rintek
Pedersen, Susanne J
Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title_full Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title_fullStr Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title_short Repeatability and reproducibility of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
title_sort repeatability and reproducibility of mri apparent diffusion coefficient applied on four different regions of interest for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and healthy volunteers scanned twice within a week
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20200004
work_keys_str_mv AT møllerjakobmøllenbach repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT østergaardmikkel repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT thomsenhenriks repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT hangaardstine repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT sørenseningej repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT madsenolerintek repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek
AT pedersensusannej repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmriapparentdiffusioncoefficientappliedonfourdifferentregionsofinterestforpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisandhealthyvolunteersscannedtwicewithinaweek