Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(Background) Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiviral combination that has been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. (Aim) This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients in the published research. (Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhumaid, Saad, Al Mutair, Abbas, Al Alawi, Zainab, Alhmeed, Naif, Zaidi, Abdul Rehman Zia, Tobaiqy, Mansour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5040180
_version_ 1783629155514974208
author Alhumaid, Saad
Al Mutair, Abbas
Al Alawi, Zainab
Alhmeed, Naif
Zaidi, Abdul Rehman Zia
Tobaiqy, Mansour
author_facet Alhumaid, Saad
Al Mutair, Abbas
Al Alawi, Zainab
Alhmeed, Naif
Zaidi, Abdul Rehman Zia
Tobaiqy, Mansour
author_sort Alhumaid, Saad
collection PubMed
description (Background) Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiviral combination that has been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. (Aim) This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients in the published research. (Methods) A protocol was developed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Articles were selected for review from 8 electronic databases. This review evaluated the effects of LPV/RTV alone or in combination with standard care ± interferons/antiviral treatments compared to other therapies, regarding duration of hospital stay, risk of progressing to invasive mechanical, time to virological cure and body temperature normalization, cough relief, radiological progression, mortality and safety. (Results) A consensus was reached to select 32 articles for full-text screening; only 14 articles comprising 9036 patients were included in this study; and eight of these were included for meta-analysis. Most of these studies did not report positive clinical outcomes with LPV/RTV treatment. In terms of virological cure, three studies reported less time in days to achieve a virological cure for LPV/RTV arm relative to no antiviral treatment (−0.81 day; 95% confidence interval (CI), −4.44 to 2.81; p = 0.007, I(2) = 80%). However, the overall effect was not significant (p = 0.66). When comparing the LPV/RTV arm to umifenovir arm, a favorable affect was observed for umifenovir arm, but not statically significant (p = 0.09). In terms of time to body normalization and cough relief, no favorable effects of LPV/RTV versus umifenovir were observed. The largest trials (RECOVERY and SOLIDARITY) have shown that LPV/RTV failed to reduce mortality, initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation or hospitalization duration. Adverse events were reported most frequently for LPV/RTV (n = 84) relative to other antivirals and no antiviral treatments. (Conclusions) This review did not reveal any significant advantage in efficacy of LPV/RTV for the treatment of COVID-19 over standard care, no antivirals or other antiviral treatments. This result might not reflect the actual evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7768433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77684332020-12-29 Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Alhumaid, Saad Al Mutair, Abbas Al Alawi, Zainab Alhmeed, Naif Zaidi, Abdul Rehman Zia Tobaiqy, Mansour Trop Med Infect Dis Review (Background) Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiviral combination that has been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. (Aim) This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LPV/RTV in COVID-19 patients in the published research. (Methods) A protocol was developed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Articles were selected for review from 8 electronic databases. This review evaluated the effects of LPV/RTV alone or in combination with standard care ± interferons/antiviral treatments compared to other therapies, regarding duration of hospital stay, risk of progressing to invasive mechanical, time to virological cure and body temperature normalization, cough relief, radiological progression, mortality and safety. (Results) A consensus was reached to select 32 articles for full-text screening; only 14 articles comprising 9036 patients were included in this study; and eight of these were included for meta-analysis. Most of these studies did not report positive clinical outcomes with LPV/RTV treatment. In terms of virological cure, three studies reported less time in days to achieve a virological cure for LPV/RTV arm relative to no antiviral treatment (−0.81 day; 95% confidence interval (CI), −4.44 to 2.81; p = 0.007, I(2) = 80%). However, the overall effect was not significant (p = 0.66). When comparing the LPV/RTV arm to umifenovir arm, a favorable affect was observed for umifenovir arm, but not statically significant (p = 0.09). In terms of time to body normalization and cough relief, no favorable effects of LPV/RTV versus umifenovir were observed. The largest trials (RECOVERY and SOLIDARITY) have shown that LPV/RTV failed to reduce mortality, initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation or hospitalization duration. Adverse events were reported most frequently for LPV/RTV (n = 84) relative to other antivirals and no antiviral treatments. (Conclusions) This review did not reveal any significant advantage in efficacy of LPV/RTV for the treatment of COVID-19 over standard care, no antivirals or other antiviral treatments. This result might not reflect the actual evidence. MDPI 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7768433/ /pubmed/33260553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5040180 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Alhumaid, Saad
Al Mutair, Abbas
Al Alawi, Zainab
Alhmeed, Naif
Zaidi, Abdul Rehman Zia
Tobaiqy, Mansour
Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir for treatment of covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5040180
work_keys_str_mv AT alhumaidsaad efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT almutairabbas efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alalawizainab efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alhmeednaif efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zaidiabdulrehmanzia efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tobaiqymansour efficacyandsafetyoflopinavirritonavirfortreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis