Cargando…
Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and externally validate a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five designated tertiary hospitals for COVID-19 in Hubei province, China. PARTICIPANTS: We routinely collected medical data of 1364 confirmed ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044028 |
_version_ | 1783629196580356096 |
---|---|
author | Mei, Jin Hu, Weihua Chen, Qijian Li, Chang Chen, Zaishu Fan, Yanjie Tian, Shuwei Zhang, Zhuheng Li, Bin Ye, Qifa Yue, Jiang Wang, Qiao-Li |
author_facet | Mei, Jin Hu, Weihua Chen, Qijian Li, Chang Chen, Zaishu Fan, Yanjie Tian, Shuwei Zhang, Zhuheng Li, Bin Ye, Qifa Yue, Jiang Wang, Qiao-Li |
author_sort | Mei, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and externally validate a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five designated tertiary hospitals for COVID-19 in Hubei province, China. PARTICIPANTS: We routinely collected medical data of 1364 confirmed adult patients with COVID-19 between 8 January and 19 March 2020. Among them, 1088 patients from two designated hospitals in Wuhan were used to develop the prognostic model, and 276 patients from three hospitals outside Wuhan were used for external validation. All patients were followed up for a maximal of 60 days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS: The model discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Somers’ D test, and calibration was examined by the calibration plot. Decision curve analysis was conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 60 days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: The full model included seven predictors of age, respiratory failure, white cell count, lymphocytes, platelets, D-dimer and lactate dehydrogenase. The simple model contained five indicators of age, respiratory failure, coronary heart disease, renal failure and heart failure. After cross-validation, the AUC statistics based on derivation cohort were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97) for the full model and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.95) for the simple model. The AUC statistics based on the external validation cohort were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.98) for the full model and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.96) for the simple model. Good calibration accuracy of these two models was found in the derivation and validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The prediction models showed good model performance in identifying patients with COVID-19 with a high risk of death in 60 days. It may be useful for acute risk classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7768618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77686182020-12-28 Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study Mei, Jin Hu, Weihua Chen, Qijian Li, Chang Chen, Zaishu Fan, Yanjie Tian, Shuwei Zhang, Zhuheng Li, Bin Ye, Qifa Yue, Jiang Wang, Qiao-Li BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and externally validate a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Five designated tertiary hospitals for COVID-19 in Hubei province, China. PARTICIPANTS: We routinely collected medical data of 1364 confirmed adult patients with COVID-19 between 8 January and 19 March 2020. Among them, 1088 patients from two designated hospitals in Wuhan were used to develop the prognostic model, and 276 patients from three hospitals outside Wuhan were used for external validation. All patients were followed up for a maximal of 60 days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS: The model discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Somers’ D test, and calibration was examined by the calibration plot. Decision curve analysis was conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 60 days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: The full model included seven predictors of age, respiratory failure, white cell count, lymphocytes, platelets, D-dimer and lactate dehydrogenase. The simple model contained five indicators of age, respiratory failure, coronary heart disease, renal failure and heart failure. After cross-validation, the AUC statistics based on derivation cohort were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97) for the full model and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.95) for the simple model. The AUC statistics based on the external validation cohort were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.98) for the full model and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.96) for the simple model. Good calibration accuracy of these two models was found in the derivation and validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The prediction models showed good model performance in identifying patients with COVID-19 with a high risk of death in 60 days. It may be useful for acute risk classification. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7768618/ /pubmed/33361083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044028 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Mei, Jin Hu, Weihua Chen, Qijian Li, Chang Chen, Zaishu Fan, Yanjie Tian, Shuwei Zhang, Zhuheng Li, Bin Ye, Qifa Yue, Jiang Wang, Qiao-Li Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title | Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Development and external validation of a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | development and external validation of a covid-19 mortality risk prediction algorithm: a multicentre retrospective cohort study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meijin developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT huweihua developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenqijian developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT lichang developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenzaishu developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT fanyanjie developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT tianshuwei developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangzhuheng developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT libin developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT yeqifa developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT yuejiang developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT wangqiaoli developmentandexternalvalidationofacovid19mortalityriskpredictionalgorithmamulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy |