Cargando…

Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement

PURPOSE: To evaluate variability in measured intraocular pressure (IOP) values when correlated with central corneal thickness measurements obtained by both ultrasonic and optical tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 46 eyes of 46 healthy subjects (age range 35–76 years). Exclusion criteria for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali, Abdelhalim, Ahmed Shawkat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S288391
_version_ 1783629263358918656
author Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali
Abdelhalim, Ahmed Shawkat
author_facet Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali
Abdelhalim, Ahmed Shawkat
author_sort Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate variability in measured intraocular pressure (IOP) values when correlated with central corneal thickness measurements obtained by both ultrasonic and optical tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 46 eyes of 46 healthy subjects (age range 35–76 years). Exclusion criteria for the current study were patients with confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect patients and those having corneal opacities, scars or prior cornea-based laser vision correction. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using two methods: ultrasonically (CCT1) by pachymeter and optically (CCT2) using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The IOP was measured in all subjects using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). RESULTS: No significant difference was detected comparing intraocular pressure values and CCT-corrected intraocular pressure (IOPcc1 and IOPcc2) (P=0.47 and P=0.06, respectively) among the study participants. A significant negative correlation was found between corneal thickness-corrected IOP values and the measured central corneal thickness by both optical and ultrasonic tools (P=0.004 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure appears to be dependent and positively correlated with CCT changes. However, this does not appear to depend largely on methods used for measuring the CCT in the current study. Corrected intraocular pressure is negatively correlated to both ultrasonically and optically measured central corneal thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77691382020-12-29 Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali Abdelhalim, Ahmed Shawkat Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate variability in measured intraocular pressure (IOP) values when correlated with central corneal thickness measurements obtained by both ultrasonic and optical tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 46 eyes of 46 healthy subjects (age range 35–76 years). Exclusion criteria for the current study were patients with confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect patients and those having corneal opacities, scars or prior cornea-based laser vision correction. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using two methods: ultrasonically (CCT1) by pachymeter and optically (CCT2) using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). The IOP was measured in all subjects using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). RESULTS: No significant difference was detected comparing intraocular pressure values and CCT-corrected intraocular pressure (IOPcc1 and IOPcc2) (P=0.47 and P=0.06, respectively) among the study participants. A significant negative correlation was found between corneal thickness-corrected IOP values and the measured central corneal thickness by both optical and ultrasonic tools (P=0.004 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure appears to be dependent and positively correlated with CCT changes. However, this does not appear to depend largely on methods used for measuring the CCT in the current study. Corrected intraocular pressure is negatively correlated to both ultrasonically and optically measured central corneal thickness. Dove 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7769138/ /pubmed/33380784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S288391 Text en © 2020 Ahmed and Abdelhalim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ahmed, Mohamed Attia Ali
Abdelhalim, Ahmed Shawkat
Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title_full Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title_fullStr Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title_short Corrected Intraocular Pressure Variability with Central Corneal Thickness Measurement
title_sort corrected intraocular pressure variability with central corneal thickness measurement
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S288391
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmohamedattiaali correctedintraocularpressurevariabilitywithcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement
AT abdelhalimahmedshawkat correctedintraocularpressurevariabilitywithcentralcornealthicknessmeasurement