Cargando…
Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research propos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973 |
_version_ | 1783629286090997760 |
---|---|
author | Botham, Crystal M. Brawn, Shay Steele, Latishya Barrón, Cisco B. Kleppner, Sofie R. Herschlag, Daniel |
author_facet | Botham, Crystal M. Brawn, Shay Steele, Latishya Barrón, Cisco B. Kleppner, Sofie R. Herschlag, Daniel |
author_sort | Botham, Crystal M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research proposals. Its core program is a multi-week Proposal Bootcamp designed to increase the feedback writers receive as they develop and refine their proposals. The Proposal Bootcamp consisted of two-hour weekly meetings that included mini lectures and peer review. Bootcamp participants also attended faculty review workshops to obtain faculty feedback. Postdoctoral trainees were trained and hired as course teaching assistants and facilitated weekly meetings and review workshops. Over the last six years, the annual Bootcamp has provided 525 doctoral students and postdocs with multi-level feedback (peer and faculty). Proposals from Bootcamp participants were almost twice as likely to be funded than proposals from non-Bootcamp trainees. Overall, this structured program provided opportunities for feedback from multiple peer and faculty reviewers, increased the participants’ confidence in developing and submitting research proposals, while accommodating a large number of participants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7769268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77692682021-01-08 Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy Botham, Crystal M. Brawn, Shay Steele, Latishya Barrón, Cisco B. Kleppner, Sofie R. Herschlag, Daniel PLoS One Research Article Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research proposals. Its core program is a multi-week Proposal Bootcamp designed to increase the feedback writers receive as they develop and refine their proposals. The Proposal Bootcamp consisted of two-hour weekly meetings that included mini lectures and peer review. Bootcamp participants also attended faculty review workshops to obtain faculty feedback. Postdoctoral trainees were trained and hired as course teaching assistants and facilitated weekly meetings and review workshops. Over the last six years, the annual Bootcamp has provided 525 doctoral students and postdocs with multi-level feedback (peer and faculty). Proposals from Bootcamp participants were almost twice as likely to be funded than proposals from non-Bootcamp trainees. Overall, this structured program provided opportunities for feedback from multiple peer and faculty reviewers, increased the participants’ confidence in developing and submitting research proposals, while accommodating a large number of participants. Public Library of Science 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7769268/ /pubmed/33370337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973 Text en © 2020 Botham et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Botham, Crystal M. Brawn, Shay Steele, Latishya Barrón, Cisco B. Kleppner, Sofie R. Herschlag, Daniel Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title | Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title_full | Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title_fullStr | Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title_short | Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
title_sort | biosciences proposal bootcamp: structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bothamcrystalm biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy AT brawnshay biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy AT steelelatishya biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy AT barronciscob biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy AT kleppnersofier biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy AT herschlagdaniel biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy |