Cargando…

Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy

Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research propos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botham, Crystal M., Brawn, Shay, Steele, Latishya, Barrón, Cisco B., Kleppner, Sofie R., Herschlag, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973
_version_ 1783629286090997760
author Botham, Crystal M.
Brawn, Shay
Steele, Latishya
Barrón, Cisco B.
Kleppner, Sofie R.
Herschlag, Daniel
author_facet Botham, Crystal M.
Brawn, Shay
Steele, Latishya
Barrón, Cisco B.
Kleppner, Sofie R.
Herschlag, Daniel
author_sort Botham, Crystal M.
collection PubMed
description Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research proposals. Its core program is a multi-week Proposal Bootcamp designed to increase the feedback writers receive as they develop and refine their proposals. The Proposal Bootcamp consisted of two-hour weekly meetings that included mini lectures and peer review. Bootcamp participants also attended faculty review workshops to obtain faculty feedback. Postdoctoral trainees were trained and hired as course teaching assistants and facilitated weekly meetings and review workshops. Over the last six years, the annual Bootcamp has provided 525 doctoral students and postdocs with multi-level feedback (peer and faculty). Proposals from Bootcamp participants were almost twice as likely to be funded than proposals from non-Bootcamp trainees. Overall, this structured program provided opportunities for feedback from multiple peer and faculty reviewers, increased the participants’ confidence in developing and submitting research proposals, while accommodating a large number of participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77692682021-01-08 Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy Botham, Crystal M. Brawn, Shay Steele, Latishya Barrón, Cisco B. Kleppner, Sofie R. Herschlag, Daniel PLoS One Research Article Grant writing is an essential skill to develop for academic and other career success but providing individual feedback to large numbers of trainees is challenging. In 2014, we launched the Stanford Biosciences Grant Writing Academy to support graduate students and postdocs in writing research proposals. Its core program is a multi-week Proposal Bootcamp designed to increase the feedback writers receive as they develop and refine their proposals. The Proposal Bootcamp consisted of two-hour weekly meetings that included mini lectures and peer review. Bootcamp participants also attended faculty review workshops to obtain faculty feedback. Postdoctoral trainees were trained and hired as course teaching assistants and facilitated weekly meetings and review workshops. Over the last six years, the annual Bootcamp has provided 525 doctoral students and postdocs with multi-level feedback (peer and faculty). Proposals from Bootcamp participants were almost twice as likely to be funded than proposals from non-Bootcamp trainees. Overall, this structured program provided opportunities for feedback from multiple peer and faculty reviewers, increased the participants’ confidence in developing and submitting research proposals, while accommodating a large number of participants. Public Library of Science 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7769268/ /pubmed/33370337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973 Text en © 2020 Botham et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Botham, Crystal M.
Brawn, Shay
Steele, Latishya
Barrón, Cisco B.
Kleppner, Sofie R.
Herschlag, Daniel
Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title_full Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title_fullStr Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title_short Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
title_sort biosciences proposal bootcamp: structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees’ proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243973
work_keys_str_mv AT bothamcrystalm biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy
AT brawnshay biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy
AT steelelatishya biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy
AT barronciscob biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy
AT kleppnersofier biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy
AT herschlagdaniel biosciencesproposalbootcampstructuredpeerandfacultyfeedbackimprovestraineesproposalsandgrantsmanshipselfefficacy