Cargando…

Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system has been used for diagnosing overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, the cut-off points of fibrin-related markers remain unclear. The ability of the ISTH DIC score and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MODS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Tie-Ying, Yang, Wen-Chao, Zhou, Fei-Hu, Song, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023831
_version_ 1783629294360068096
author Gao, Tie-Ying
Yang, Wen-Chao
Zhou, Fei-Hu
Song, Qing
author_facet Gao, Tie-Ying
Yang, Wen-Chao
Zhou, Fei-Hu
Song, Qing
author_sort Gao, Tie-Ying
collection PubMed
description The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system has been used for diagnosing overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, the cut-off points of fibrin-related markers remain unclear. The ability of the ISTH DIC score and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MODS) score to predict mortality in cases of exertional heat illness (EHI) was tested. In the process, 3 different D-dimer cut-off values for diagnosing overt DIC were evaluated. Data were obtained on the first day of hospitalization for 76 patients with EHI. The DIC score was calculated according to the ISTH scoring system using 3 D-dimer cut-off values. In predicting mortality, methods 1 and 2 had the same sensitivity and specificity, which were 85% and 73.2%, respectively. The sensitivity for method 3 was 70%. Furthermore, the specificity of the DIC score for method 3 was 89%, which was higher than that of the other 2 methods. The correlation coefficients of the DIC and MODS scores of these 3 methods were 0.757, 0.748, and 0.756, respectively. For the prediction of mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the DIC scores of these 3 methods was 0.838, 0.842, and 0.85, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the ROC curve of the MODS score was 0.927. The DIC score had a certain predictive power of a poor outcome of EHI patients, but this was not better than the MODS score. The present data may serve as a reference in selecting the appropriate D-dimer cut-off point for the ISTH DIC score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77693032020-12-29 Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness Gao, Tie-Ying Yang, Wen-Chao Zhou, Fei-Hu Song, Qing Medicine (Baltimore) 4800 The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system has been used for diagnosing overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, the cut-off points of fibrin-related markers remain unclear. The ability of the ISTH DIC score and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MODS) score to predict mortality in cases of exertional heat illness (EHI) was tested. In the process, 3 different D-dimer cut-off values for diagnosing overt DIC were evaluated. Data were obtained on the first day of hospitalization for 76 patients with EHI. The DIC score was calculated according to the ISTH scoring system using 3 D-dimer cut-off values. In predicting mortality, methods 1 and 2 had the same sensitivity and specificity, which were 85% and 73.2%, respectively. The sensitivity for method 3 was 70%. Furthermore, the specificity of the DIC score for method 3 was 89%, which was higher than that of the other 2 methods. The correlation coefficients of the DIC and MODS scores of these 3 methods were 0.757, 0.748, and 0.756, respectively. For the prediction of mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the DIC scores of these 3 methods was 0.838, 0.842, and 0.85, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the ROC curve of the MODS score was 0.927. The DIC score had a certain predictive power of a poor outcome of EHI patients, but this was not better than the MODS score. The present data may serve as a reference in selecting the appropriate D-dimer cut-off point for the ISTH DIC score. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7769303/ /pubmed/33350770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023831 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4800
Gao, Tie-Ying
Yang, Wen-Chao
Zhou, Fei-Hu
Song, Qing
Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title_full Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title_fullStr Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title_short Analysis of D-dimer cut-off values for overt DIC diagnosis in exertional heat illness
title_sort analysis of d-dimer cut-off values for overt dic diagnosis in exertional heat illness
topic 4800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023831
work_keys_str_mv AT gaotieying analysisofddimercutoffvaluesforovertdicdiagnosisinexertionalheatillness
AT yangwenchao analysisofddimercutoffvaluesforovertdicdiagnosisinexertionalheatillness
AT zhoufeihu analysisofddimercutoffvaluesforovertdicdiagnosisinexertionalheatillness
AT songqing analysisofddimercutoffvaluesforovertdicdiagnosisinexertionalheatillness