Cargando…

Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital

The levels of indoor air pollutants are increasing. However, the indoor air quality of only operating rooms, intensive care units, and radiology departments is usually monitored in hospitals. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the indoor air quality of an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic and compare a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyun-Joo, Lee, Kang Hyun, Kim, Dong-Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023942
_version_ 1783629308204417024
author Lee, Hyun-Joo
Lee, Kang Hyun
Kim, Dong-Kyu
author_facet Lee, Hyun-Joo
Lee, Kang Hyun
Kim, Dong-Kyu
author_sort Lee, Hyun-Joo
collection PubMed
description The levels of indoor air pollutants are increasing. However, the indoor air quality of only operating rooms, intensive care units, and radiology departments is usually monitored in hospitals. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the indoor air quality of an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic and compare air quality indices among different areas in a hospital. We prospectively measured indoor air quality using air quality sensors in different areas of a hospital from February 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)), total volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter with diameter of <2.5 μm (PM2.5), and nitrogen dioxide concentrations were measured in the otorhinolaryngology clinic, orthopedic clinic, and reception area. The intervention efficacy was compared between otorhinolaryngology clinics employing and not employing air-cleaners. The overall concentrations of CO(2), VOCs, and PM2.5 in the otorhinolaryngology clinic were significantly higher than those in the orthopedic clinic or reception area. The indoor air quality was the worst in winter. The intervention effect was observed only in PM2.5 concentrations in otorhinolaryngology clinics employing an air-cleaner. Medical practitioners and patients are frequently exposed to ambient indoor air pollution in otorhinolaryngology clinics. Hence, health-related strategies to protect against ambient indoor air pollution in otorhinolaryngology clinics are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77693622020-12-29 Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital Lee, Hyun-Joo Lee, Kang Hyun Kim, Dong-Kyu Medicine (Baltimore) 4700 The levels of indoor air pollutants are increasing. However, the indoor air quality of only operating rooms, intensive care units, and radiology departments is usually monitored in hospitals. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the indoor air quality of an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic and compare air quality indices among different areas in a hospital. We prospectively measured indoor air quality using air quality sensors in different areas of a hospital from February 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)), total volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter with diameter of <2.5 μm (PM2.5), and nitrogen dioxide concentrations were measured in the otorhinolaryngology clinic, orthopedic clinic, and reception area. The intervention efficacy was compared between otorhinolaryngology clinics employing and not employing air-cleaners. The overall concentrations of CO(2), VOCs, and PM2.5 in the otorhinolaryngology clinic were significantly higher than those in the orthopedic clinic or reception area. The indoor air quality was the worst in winter. The intervention effect was observed only in PM2.5 concentrations in otorhinolaryngology clinics employing an air-cleaner. Medical practitioners and patients are frequently exposed to ambient indoor air pollution in otorhinolaryngology clinics. Hence, health-related strategies to protect against ambient indoor air pollution in otorhinolaryngology clinics are warranted. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7769362/ /pubmed/33350799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023942 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4700
Lee, Hyun-Joo
Lee, Kang Hyun
Kim, Dong-Kyu
Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title_full Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title_short Evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
title_sort evaluation and comparison of the indoor air quality in different areas of the hospital
topic 4700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023942
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyunjoo evaluationandcomparisonoftheindoorairqualityindifferentareasofthehospital
AT leekanghyun evaluationandcomparisonoftheindoorairqualityindifferentareasofthehospital
AT kimdongkyu evaluationandcomparisonoftheindoorairqualityindifferentareasofthehospital