Cargando…
Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094 |
_version_ | 1783629314378432512 |
---|---|
author | Imae, Toshikazu Takenaka, Shigeharu Watanabe, Yuichi Aoki, Atsushi Matsuda, Kanako Sasaki, Katsutake Saegusa, Shigeki Nawa, Kanabu Nakagawa, Keiichi Abe, Osamu |
author_facet | Imae, Toshikazu Takenaka, Shigeharu Watanabe, Yuichi Aoki, Atsushi Matsuda, Kanako Sasaki, Katsutake Saegusa, Shigeki Nawa, Kanabu Nakagawa, Keiichi Abe, Osamu |
author_sort | Imae, Toshikazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging from 2 × 2 to 10 × 10 cm(2). It was found that the dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was relatively small. The maximum dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was 4.4% at a depth of 1 mm for a field size of 2 × 2 cm(2). The dose difference was gradually decreased while the field size was increased up to 10 × 10 cm(2). The measured data were also compared to published Varian FF and FFF data, suggesting that the percentage surface and build‐up doses as well as the percentage dose difference between FF and FFF beams by our Elekta linac were smaller than those by the Varian linac. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7769389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77693892020-12-31 Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom Imae, Toshikazu Takenaka, Shigeharu Watanabe, Yuichi Aoki, Atsushi Matsuda, Kanako Sasaki, Katsutake Saegusa, Shigeki Nawa, Kanabu Nakagawa, Keiichi Abe, Osamu J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging from 2 × 2 to 10 × 10 cm(2). It was found that the dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was relatively small. The maximum dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was 4.4% at a depth of 1 mm for a field size of 2 × 2 cm(2). The dose difference was gradually decreased while the field size was increased up to 10 × 10 cm(2). The measured data were also compared to published Varian FF and FFF data, suggesting that the percentage surface and build‐up doses as well as the percentage dose difference between FF and FFF beams by our Elekta linac were smaller than those by the Varian linac. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7769389/ /pubmed/33184970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Imae, Toshikazu Takenaka, Shigeharu Watanabe, Yuichi Aoki, Atsushi Matsuda, Kanako Sasaki, Katsutake Saegusa, Shigeki Nawa, Kanabu Nakagawa, Keiichi Abe, Osamu Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title | Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title_full | Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title_fullStr | Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title_short | Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
title_sort | surface and build‐up dose comparison between elekta 6 mv flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imaetoshikazu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT takenakashigeharu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT watanabeyuichi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT aokiatsushi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT matsudakanako surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT sasakikatsutake surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT saegusashigeki surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT nawakanabu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT nakagawakeiichi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom AT abeosamu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom |