Cargando…

Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom

Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imae, Toshikazu, Takenaka, Shigeharu, Watanabe, Yuichi, Aoki, Atsushi, Matsuda, Kanako, Sasaki, Katsutake, Saegusa, Shigeki, Nawa, Kanabu, Nakagawa, Keiichi, Abe, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094
_version_ 1783629314378432512
author Imae, Toshikazu
Takenaka, Shigeharu
Watanabe, Yuichi
Aoki, Atsushi
Matsuda, Kanako
Sasaki, Katsutake
Saegusa, Shigeki
Nawa, Kanabu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
Abe, Osamu
author_facet Imae, Toshikazu
Takenaka, Shigeharu
Watanabe, Yuichi
Aoki, Atsushi
Matsuda, Kanako
Sasaki, Katsutake
Saegusa, Shigeki
Nawa, Kanabu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
Abe, Osamu
author_sort Imae, Toshikazu
collection PubMed
description Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging from 2 × 2 to 10 × 10 cm(2). It was found that the dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was relatively small. The maximum dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was 4.4% at a depth of 1 mm for a field size of 2 × 2 cm(2). The dose difference was gradually decreased while the field size was increased up to 10 × 10 cm(2). The measured data were also compared to published Varian FF and FFF data, suggesting that the percentage surface and build‐up doses as well as the percentage dose difference between FF and FFF beams by our Elekta linac were smaller than those by the Varian linac.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77693892020-12-31 Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom Imae, Toshikazu Takenaka, Shigeharu Watanabe, Yuichi Aoki, Atsushi Matsuda, Kanako Sasaki, Katsutake Saegusa, Shigeki Nawa, Kanabu Nakagawa, Keiichi Abe, Osamu J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Using a plane‐parallel advanced Markus ionization chamber and a stack of water‐equivalent solid phantom blocks, percentage surface and build‐up doses of Elekta 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams were measured as a function of the phantom depth for field sizes ranging from 2 × 2 to 10 × 10 cm(2). It was found that the dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was relatively small. The maximum dose difference between the FF and the FFF beams was 4.4% at a depth of 1 mm for a field size of 2 × 2 cm(2). The dose difference was gradually decreased while the field size was increased up to 10 × 10 cm(2). The measured data were also compared to published Varian FF and FFF data, suggesting that the percentage surface and build‐up doses as well as the percentage dose difference between FF and FFF beams by our Elekta linac were smaller than those by the Varian linac. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7769389/ /pubmed/33184970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Imae, Toshikazu
Takenaka, Shigeharu
Watanabe, Yuichi
Aoki, Atsushi
Matsuda, Kanako
Sasaki, Katsutake
Saegusa, Shigeki
Nawa, Kanabu
Nakagawa, Keiichi
Abe, Osamu
Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title_full Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title_fullStr Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title_full_unstemmed Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title_short Surface and build‐up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
title_sort surface and build‐up dose comparison between elekta 6 mv flattening filter and flattening‐filter‐free beams using an advanced markus ionization chamber and a solid water‐equivalent phantom
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13094
work_keys_str_mv AT imaetoshikazu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT takenakashigeharu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT watanabeyuichi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT aokiatsushi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT matsudakanako surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT sasakikatsutake surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT saegusashigeki surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT nawakanabu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT nakagawakeiichi surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom
AT abeosamu surfaceandbuildupdosecomparisonbetweenelekta6mvflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreebeamsusinganadvancedmarkusionizationchamberandasolidwaterequivalentphantom