Cargando…

Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumazaki, Yu, Hirai, Ryuta, Igari, Mitsunobu, Kobayashi, Nao, Okazaki, Shohei, Abe, Takanori, Tamaki, Tomoaki, Noda, Shin‐ei, Kato, Shingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33136313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovoid applicators. Lead‐based, cylindrically shaped radiopaque markers, which scatter radiation and blacken the Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films placed on the applicators, were inserted into the phantom to determine the applicator tip and reference source positions. A three‐dimensional image‐guided brachytherapy (3D‐IGBT) plan was generated, and the source positions on the film and radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) were verified with the tool. Source position errors were evaluated as the distance in the applicator axis direction between the source position and the center position of two radiopaque marker pairs. RESULTS: Source position errors on the film and RTPS were in good agreement with one another and were all within 0.5 mm for all applicators. Offset values of each applicator were in good agreement with the value determined in treatment planning (6 mm). The expanded measurement uncertainty of our QA tool was estimated to be 0.87 mm, with a coverage factor k of 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HDR‐BT QA tool developed for comprehensive source position verification will be useful for cross checking actual source positions and planned source positions on the RTPS.