Cargando…
Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33136313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063 |
_version_ | 1783629316512284672 |
---|---|
author | Kumazaki, Yu Hirai, Ryuta Igari, Mitsunobu Kobayashi, Nao Okazaki, Shohei Abe, Takanori Tamaki, Tomoaki Noda, Shin‐ei Kato, Shingo |
author_facet | Kumazaki, Yu Hirai, Ryuta Igari, Mitsunobu Kobayashi, Nao Okazaki, Shohei Abe, Takanori Tamaki, Tomoaki Noda, Shin‐ei Kato, Shingo |
author_sort | Kumazaki, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovoid applicators. Lead‐based, cylindrically shaped radiopaque markers, which scatter radiation and blacken the Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films placed on the applicators, were inserted into the phantom to determine the applicator tip and reference source positions. A three‐dimensional image‐guided brachytherapy (3D‐IGBT) plan was generated, and the source positions on the film and radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) were verified with the tool. Source position errors were evaluated as the distance in the applicator axis direction between the source position and the center position of two radiopaque marker pairs. RESULTS: Source position errors on the film and RTPS were in good agreement with one another and were all within 0.5 mm for all applicators. Offset values of each applicator were in good agreement with the value determined in treatment planning (6 mm). The expanded measurement uncertainty of our QA tool was estimated to be 0.87 mm, with a coverage factor k of 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HDR‐BT QA tool developed for comprehensive source position verification will be useful for cross checking actual source positions and planned source positions on the RTPS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7769398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77693982020-12-31 Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification Kumazaki, Yu Hirai, Ryuta Igari, Mitsunobu Kobayashi, Nao Okazaki, Shohei Abe, Takanori Tamaki, Tomoaki Noda, Shin‐ei Kato, Shingo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovoid applicators. Lead‐based, cylindrically shaped radiopaque markers, which scatter radiation and blacken the Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films placed on the applicators, were inserted into the phantom to determine the applicator tip and reference source positions. A three‐dimensional image‐guided brachytherapy (3D‐IGBT) plan was generated, and the source positions on the film and radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) were verified with the tool. Source position errors were evaluated as the distance in the applicator axis direction between the source position and the center position of two radiopaque marker pairs. RESULTS: Source position errors on the film and RTPS were in good agreement with one another and were all within 0.5 mm for all applicators. Offset values of each applicator were in good agreement with the value determined in treatment planning (6 mm). The expanded measurement uncertainty of our QA tool was estimated to be 0.87 mm, with a coverage factor k of 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HDR‐BT QA tool developed for comprehensive source position verification will be useful for cross checking actual source positions and planned source positions on the RTPS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7769398/ /pubmed/33136313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Kumazaki, Yu Hirai, Ryuta Igari, Mitsunobu Kobayashi, Nao Okazaki, Shohei Abe, Takanori Tamaki, Tomoaki Noda, Shin‐ei Kato, Shingo Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title | Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title_full | Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title_fullStr | Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title_short | Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification |
title_sort | development of an hdr‐bt qa tool for source position verification |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33136313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumazakiyu developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT hirairyuta developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT igarimitsunobu developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT kobayashinao developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT okazakishohei developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT abetakanori developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT tamakitomoaki developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT nodashinei developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification AT katoshingo developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification |