Cargando…

Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumazaki, Yu, Hirai, Ryuta, Igari, Mitsunobu, Kobayashi, Nao, Okazaki, Shohei, Abe, Takanori, Tamaki, Tomoaki, Noda, Shin‐ei, Kato, Shingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33136313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063
_version_ 1783629316512284672
author Kumazaki, Yu
Hirai, Ryuta
Igari, Mitsunobu
Kobayashi, Nao
Okazaki, Shohei
Abe, Takanori
Tamaki, Tomoaki
Noda, Shin‐ei
Kato, Shingo
author_facet Kumazaki, Yu
Hirai, Ryuta
Igari, Mitsunobu
Kobayashi, Nao
Okazaki, Shohei
Abe, Takanori
Tamaki, Tomoaki
Noda, Shin‐ei
Kato, Shingo
author_sort Kumazaki, Yu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovoid applicators. Lead‐based, cylindrically shaped radiopaque markers, which scatter radiation and blacken the Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films placed on the applicators, were inserted into the phantom to determine the applicator tip and reference source positions. A three‐dimensional image‐guided brachytherapy (3D‐IGBT) plan was generated, and the source positions on the film and radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) were verified with the tool. Source position errors were evaluated as the distance in the applicator axis direction between the source position and the center position of two radiopaque marker pairs. RESULTS: Source position errors on the film and RTPS were in good agreement with one another and were all within 0.5 mm for all applicators. Offset values of each applicator were in good agreement with the value determined in treatment planning (6 mm). The expanded measurement uncertainty of our QA tool was estimated to be 0.87 mm, with a coverage factor k of 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HDR‐BT QA tool developed for comprehensive source position verification will be useful for cross checking actual source positions and planned source positions on the RTPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77693982020-12-31 Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification Kumazaki, Yu Hirai, Ryuta Igari, Mitsunobu Kobayashi, Nao Okazaki, Shohei Abe, Takanori Tamaki, Tomoaki Noda, Shin‐ei Kato, Shingo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of source positions, and to report on its effectiveness. METHODS: We fabricated a cuboid phantom measuring 30 × 30×3 cm(3) with spaces to embed Fletcher‐Williamson tandem and ovoid applicators. Lead‐based, cylindrically shaped radiopaque markers, which scatter radiation and blacken the Gafchromic(®) RTQA2 films placed on the applicators, were inserted into the phantom to determine the applicator tip and reference source positions. A three‐dimensional image‐guided brachytherapy (3D‐IGBT) plan was generated, and the source positions on the film and radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) were verified with the tool. Source position errors were evaluated as the distance in the applicator axis direction between the source position and the center position of two radiopaque marker pairs. RESULTS: Source position errors on the film and RTPS were in good agreement with one another and were all within 0.5 mm for all applicators. Offset values of each applicator were in good agreement with the value determined in treatment planning (6 mm). The expanded measurement uncertainty of our QA tool was estimated to be 0.87 mm, with a coverage factor k of 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HDR‐BT QA tool developed for comprehensive source position verification will be useful for cross checking actual source positions and planned source positions on the RTPS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7769398/ /pubmed/33136313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kumazaki, Yu
Hirai, Ryuta
Igari, Mitsunobu
Kobayashi, Nao
Okazaki, Shohei
Abe, Takanori
Tamaki, Tomoaki
Noda, Shin‐ei
Kato, Shingo
Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title_full Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title_fullStr Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title_full_unstemmed Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title_short Development of an HDR‐BT QA tool for source position verification
title_sort development of an hdr‐bt qa tool for source position verification
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33136313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13063
work_keys_str_mv AT kumazakiyu developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT hirairyuta developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT igarimitsunobu developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT kobayashinao developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT okazakishohei developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT abetakanori developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT tamakitomoaki developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT nodashinei developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification
AT katoshingo developmentofanhdrbtqatoolforsourcepositionverification