Cargando…

Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of neck-arm pain is heterogeneous with varying underlying pain types (nociceptive/neuropathic/mixed) and pain mechanisms (peripheral/central sensitization). A mechanism-based clinical framework for spinally referred pain has been proposed, which classifies into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapitza, Camilla, Lüdtke, Kerstin, Tampin, Brigitte, Ballenberger, Nikolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244137
_version_ 1783629332817641472
author Kapitza, Camilla
Lüdtke, Kerstin
Tampin, Brigitte
Ballenberger, Nikolaus
author_facet Kapitza, Camilla
Lüdtke, Kerstin
Tampin, Brigitte
Ballenberger, Nikolaus
author_sort Kapitza, Camilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of neck-arm pain is heterogeneous with varying underlying pain types (nociceptive/neuropathic/mixed) and pain mechanisms (peripheral/central sensitization). A mechanism-based clinical framework for spinally referred pain has been proposed, which classifies into (1) somatic pain, (2) neural mechanosensitivity, (3) radicular pain, (4) radiculopathy and mixed pain presentations. This study aims to (i) investigate the application of the clinical framework in patients with neck-arm pain, (ii) determine their somatosensory, clinical and psychosocial profile and (iii) observe their clinical course over time. METHOD: We describe a study protocol. Patients with unilateral neck-arm pain (n = 180) will undergo a clinical examination, after which they will be classified into subgroups according to the proposed clinical framework. Standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) measurements will be taken in their main pain area and contralateral side. Participants will have to complete questionnaires to assess function (Neck Disability Index), psychosocial factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Depression, anxiety and stress scale), neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, PainDETECT Questionnaire) and central sensitization features (Central Sensitization Inventory). Follow-ups at three, six and 12 months include the baseline questionnaires. The differences of QST data and questionnaire outcomes between and within groups will be analyzed using (M)AN(C)OVA and/or regression models. Repeated measurement analysis of variance or a linear mixed model will be used to calculate the differences between three, six, and 12 months outcomes. Multiple regression models will be used to analyze potential predictors for the clinical course. CONCLUSION: The rationale for this study is to assess the usability and utility of the proposed clinical framework as well as to identify possible differing somatosensory and psychosocial phenotypes between the subgroups. This could increase our knowledge of the underlying pain mechanisms. The longitudinal analysis may help to assess possible predictors for pain persistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77694682021-01-08 Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol Kapitza, Camilla Lüdtke, Kerstin Tampin, Brigitte Ballenberger, Nikolaus PLoS One Registered Report Protocol BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of neck-arm pain is heterogeneous with varying underlying pain types (nociceptive/neuropathic/mixed) and pain mechanisms (peripheral/central sensitization). A mechanism-based clinical framework for spinally referred pain has been proposed, which classifies into (1) somatic pain, (2) neural mechanosensitivity, (3) radicular pain, (4) radiculopathy and mixed pain presentations. This study aims to (i) investigate the application of the clinical framework in patients with neck-arm pain, (ii) determine their somatosensory, clinical and psychosocial profile and (iii) observe their clinical course over time. METHOD: We describe a study protocol. Patients with unilateral neck-arm pain (n = 180) will undergo a clinical examination, after which they will be classified into subgroups according to the proposed clinical framework. Standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) measurements will be taken in their main pain area and contralateral side. Participants will have to complete questionnaires to assess function (Neck Disability Index), psychosocial factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Depression, anxiety and stress scale), neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, PainDETECT Questionnaire) and central sensitization features (Central Sensitization Inventory). Follow-ups at three, six and 12 months include the baseline questionnaires. The differences of QST data and questionnaire outcomes between and within groups will be analyzed using (M)AN(C)OVA and/or regression models. Repeated measurement analysis of variance or a linear mixed model will be used to calculate the differences between three, six, and 12 months outcomes. Multiple regression models will be used to analyze potential predictors for the clinical course. CONCLUSION: The rationale for this study is to assess the usability and utility of the proposed clinical framework as well as to identify possible differing somatosensory and psychosocial phenotypes between the subgroups. This could increase our knowledge of the underlying pain mechanisms. The longitudinal analysis may help to assess possible predictors for pain persistency. Public Library of Science 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7769468/ /pubmed/33370389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244137 Text en © 2020 Kapitza et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Registered Report Protocol
Kapitza, Camilla
Lüdtke, Kerstin
Tampin, Brigitte
Ballenberger, Nikolaus
Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title_full Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title_fullStr Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title_short Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
title_sort application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol
topic Registered Report Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244137
work_keys_str_mv AT kapitzacamilla applicationandutilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinallyreferredneckarmpainacrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudyprotocol
AT ludtkekerstin applicationandutilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinallyreferredneckarmpainacrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudyprotocol
AT tampinbrigitte applicationandutilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinallyreferredneckarmpainacrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudyprotocol
AT ballenbergernikolaus applicationandutilityofaclinicalframeworkforspinallyreferredneckarmpainacrosssectionalandlongitudinalstudyprotocol