Cargando…
Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA
Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used for early detection, population estimations, and assessment of potential spread of invasive species, but questions remain about factors that influence eDNA detection results. Efforts are being made to understand how physical, chemical, and biological factors—sett...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244086 |
_version_ | 1783629337115754496 |
---|---|
author | Nevers, Meredith B. Przybyla-Kelly, Kasia Shively, Dawn Morris, Charles C. Dickey, Joshua Byappanahalli, Murulee N. |
author_facet | Nevers, Meredith B. Przybyla-Kelly, Kasia Shively, Dawn Morris, Charles C. Dickey, Joshua Byappanahalli, Murulee N. |
author_sort | Nevers, Meredith B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used for early detection, population estimations, and assessment of potential spread of invasive species, but questions remain about factors that influence eDNA detection results. Efforts are being made to understand how physical, chemical, and biological factors—settling, resuspension, dispersion, eDNA stability/decay—influence eDNA estimations and potentially population abundance. In a series of field and controlled mesocosm experiments, we examined the detection and accumulation of eDNA in sediment and water and the transport of eDNA in a small stream in the Lake Michigan watershed, using the invasive round goby fish (Neogobius melanostomus) as a DNA source. Experiment 1: caged fish (average n = 44) were placed in a stream devoid of round goby; water was collected over 24 hours along 120-m of stream, including a simultaneous sampling event at 7 distances from DNA source; stream monitoring continued for 24 hours after fish were removed. Experiment 2: round goby were placed in laboratory tanks; water and sediment were collected over 14 days and for another 150 days post-fish removal to calculate eDNA shedding and decay rates for water and sediment. For samples from both experiments, DNA was extracted, and qPCR targeted a cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) fragment specific to round goby. Results indicated that eDNA accumulated and decayed more slowly in sediment than water. In the stream, DNA shedding was markedly lower than calculated in the laboratory, but models indicate eDNA could potentially travel long distances (up to 50 km) under certain circumstances. Collectively, these findings show that the interactive effects of ambient conditions (e.g., eDNA stability and decay, hydrology, settling-resuspension) are important to consider when developing comprehensive models. Results of this study can help resource managers target representative sites downstream of potential invasion sites, thereby maximizing resource use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7769486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77694862021-01-08 Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA Nevers, Meredith B. Przybyla-Kelly, Kasia Shively, Dawn Morris, Charles C. Dickey, Joshua Byappanahalli, Murulee N. PLoS One Research Article Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used for early detection, population estimations, and assessment of potential spread of invasive species, but questions remain about factors that influence eDNA detection results. Efforts are being made to understand how physical, chemical, and biological factors—settling, resuspension, dispersion, eDNA stability/decay—influence eDNA estimations and potentially population abundance. In a series of field and controlled mesocosm experiments, we examined the detection and accumulation of eDNA in sediment and water and the transport of eDNA in a small stream in the Lake Michigan watershed, using the invasive round goby fish (Neogobius melanostomus) as a DNA source. Experiment 1: caged fish (average n = 44) were placed in a stream devoid of round goby; water was collected over 24 hours along 120-m of stream, including a simultaneous sampling event at 7 distances from DNA source; stream monitoring continued for 24 hours after fish were removed. Experiment 2: round goby were placed in laboratory tanks; water and sediment were collected over 14 days and for another 150 days post-fish removal to calculate eDNA shedding and decay rates for water and sediment. For samples from both experiments, DNA was extracted, and qPCR targeted a cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) fragment specific to round goby. Results indicated that eDNA accumulated and decayed more slowly in sediment than water. In the stream, DNA shedding was markedly lower than calculated in the laboratory, but models indicate eDNA could potentially travel long distances (up to 50 km) under certain circumstances. Collectively, these findings show that the interactive effects of ambient conditions (e.g., eDNA stability and decay, hydrology, settling-resuspension) are important to consider when developing comprehensive models. Results of this study can help resource managers target representative sites downstream of potential invasion sites, thereby maximizing resource use. Public Library of Science 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7769486/ /pubmed/33370371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244086 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nevers, Meredith B. Przybyla-Kelly, Kasia Shively, Dawn Morris, Charles C. Dickey, Joshua Byappanahalli, Murulee N. Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title | Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title_full | Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title_fullStr | Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title_short | Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA |
title_sort | influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental dna |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neversmeredithb influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna AT przybylakellykasia influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna AT shivelydawn influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna AT morrischarlesc influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna AT dickeyjoshua influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna AT byappanahallimuruleen influenceofsedimentandstreamtransportondetectingasourceofenvironmentaldna |