Cargando…

Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: The application of a uniform definition for acute kidney injury (AKI) is vital to advance understanding and management of AKI. International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision) (ICD-10) coding is frequently used to define AKI, but its accuracy is unclear. The aim of this study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logan, Rachael, Davey, Peter, De Souza, Nicosha, Baird, David, Guthrie, Bruce, Bell, Samira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz117
_version_ 1783629344354074624
author Logan, Rachael
Davey, Peter
De Souza, Nicosha
Baird, David
Guthrie, Bruce
Bell, Samira
author_facet Logan, Rachael
Davey, Peter
De Souza, Nicosha
Baird, David
Guthrie, Bruce
Bell, Samira
author_sort Logan, Rachael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The application of a uniform definition for acute kidney injury (AKI) is vital to advance understanding and management of AKI. International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision) (ICD-10) coding is frequently used to define AKI, but its accuracy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether ICD-10 coding is a reliable method of monitoring rates and outcomes of AKI in inpatients compared with biochemically defined AKI, and whether electronic alerts (e-alerts) for AKI affect ICD-10 AKI coding. METHODS: An observational cohort study of all 505 662 adult admissions to acute hospitals in two Scottish Health Boards [National Health Service (NHS) Tayside and NHS Fife] from January 2013 to April 2017 was performed. AKI e-alerts were implemented in NHS Tayside in April 2015. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ICD-10 coding for AKI compared with biochemically defined AKI using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes definition and relative risk of 30-day mortality in people with ICD-10 and biochemically defined AKI before and after AKI e-alert implementation were performed. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ICD-10 coding for identifying biochemically defined AKI was very poor in both health boards for all AKI (Tayside 25.7% and Fife 35.8%) and for Stages 2 and 3 AKI (Tayside 43.8% and Fife 53.8%). Positive predictive value was poor both for all AKI (Tayside 76.1% and Fife 45.5%) and for Stages 2 and 3 AKI (Tayside 45.5% and Fife 36.8%). Measured mortality fell following implementation of AKI e-alerts in the ICD-10-coded population but not in the biochemically defined AKI population, reflecting an increase in the proportion of Stage 1 AKI in ICD-10-coded AKI. There was no evidence that the introduction of AKI e-alerts in Tayside improved ICD-10 coding of AKI. CONCLUSION: ICD-10 coding should not be used for monitoring of rates and outcomes of AKI for either research or improvement programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77695332020-12-31 Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study Logan, Rachael Davey, Peter De Souza, Nicosha Baird, David Guthrie, Bruce Bell, Samira Clin Kidney J Original Articles BACKGROUND: The application of a uniform definition for acute kidney injury (AKI) is vital to advance understanding and management of AKI. International Classification of Diseases (Tenth Revision) (ICD-10) coding is frequently used to define AKI, but its accuracy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether ICD-10 coding is a reliable method of monitoring rates and outcomes of AKI in inpatients compared with biochemically defined AKI, and whether electronic alerts (e-alerts) for AKI affect ICD-10 AKI coding. METHODS: An observational cohort study of all 505 662 adult admissions to acute hospitals in two Scottish Health Boards [National Health Service (NHS) Tayside and NHS Fife] from January 2013 to April 2017 was performed. AKI e-alerts were implemented in NHS Tayside in April 2015. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ICD-10 coding for AKI compared with biochemically defined AKI using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes definition and relative risk of 30-day mortality in people with ICD-10 and biochemically defined AKI before and after AKI e-alert implementation were performed. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ICD-10 coding for identifying biochemically defined AKI was very poor in both health boards for all AKI (Tayside 25.7% and Fife 35.8%) and for Stages 2 and 3 AKI (Tayside 43.8% and Fife 53.8%). Positive predictive value was poor both for all AKI (Tayside 76.1% and Fife 45.5%) and for Stages 2 and 3 AKI (Tayside 45.5% and Fife 36.8%). Measured mortality fell following implementation of AKI e-alerts in the ICD-10-coded population but not in the biochemically defined AKI population, reflecting an increase in the proportion of Stage 1 AKI in ICD-10-coded AKI. There was no evidence that the introduction of AKI e-alerts in Tayside improved ICD-10 coding of AKI. CONCLUSION: ICD-10 coding should not be used for monitoring of rates and outcomes of AKI for either research or improvement programmes. Oxford University Press 2019-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7769533/ /pubmed/33391753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz117 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Logan, Rachael
Davey, Peter
De Souza, Nicosha
Baird, David
Guthrie, Bruce
Bell, Samira
Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title_full Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title_fullStr Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title_short Assessing the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
title_sort assessing the accuracy of icd-10 coding for measuring rates of and mortality from acute kidney injury and the impact of electronic alerts: an observational cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz117
work_keys_str_mv AT loganrachael assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy
AT daveypeter assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy
AT desouzanicosha assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy
AT bairddavid assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy
AT guthriebruce assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy
AT bellsamira assessingtheaccuracyoficd10codingformeasuringratesofandmortalityfromacutekidneyinjuryandtheimpactofelectronicalertsanobservationalcohortstudy