Cargando…

Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has escalated the burden of psychological distress. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yeli, Kala, Monica Palanichamy, Jafar, Tazeen H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244630
_version_ 1783629351357513728
author Wang, Yeli
Kala, Monica Palanichamy
Jafar, Tazeen H.
author_facet Wang, Yeli
Kala, Monica Palanichamy
Jafar, Tazeen H.
author_sort Wang, Yeli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has escalated the burden of psychological distress. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and World Health Organization COVID-19 databases (Dec 2019–15 July 2020). We included cross-sectional studies that reported factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary outcomes were self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Random-effects models were used to pool odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42020186735). FINDINGS: We included 68 studies comprising 288,830 participants from 19 countries. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% CI: 28%-39%) and 30% (26%-36%). Women versus men (OR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.29–1.71; I(2) = 90.8%]), younger versus older (< versus ≥35 years) adults (1.20 [1.13–1.26]; I(2) = 91.7%), living in rural versus urban areas (1.13 [1.00–1.29]; I(2) = 82.9%), lower versus higher socioeconomic status (e.g. lower versus higher income: 1.45 [1.24–1.69; I(2) = 82.3%]) were associated with higher anxiety odds. These factors (except for residential area) were also associated with higher depression odds. Furthermore, higher COVID-19 infection risk (suspected/confirmed cases, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions) and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression. INTERPRETATION: One in three adults in the predominantly general population have COVID-19 related psychological distress. Concerted efforts are urgently needed for interventions in high-risk populations to reduce urban-rural, socioeconomic and gender disparities in COVID-19 related psychological distress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77695622021-01-08 Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Yeli Kala, Monica Palanichamy Jafar, Tazeen H. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has escalated the burden of psychological distress. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and World Health Organization COVID-19 databases (Dec 2019–15 July 2020). We included cross-sectional studies that reported factors associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary outcomes were self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. Random-effects models were used to pool odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42020186735). FINDINGS: We included 68 studies comprising 288,830 participants from 19 countries. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% CI: 28%-39%) and 30% (26%-36%). Women versus men (OR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.29–1.71; I(2) = 90.8%]), younger versus older (< versus ≥35 years) adults (1.20 [1.13–1.26]; I(2) = 91.7%), living in rural versus urban areas (1.13 [1.00–1.29]; I(2) = 82.9%), lower versus higher socioeconomic status (e.g. lower versus higher income: 1.45 [1.24–1.69; I(2) = 82.3%]) were associated with higher anxiety odds. These factors (except for residential area) were also associated with higher depression odds. Furthermore, higher COVID-19 infection risk (suspected/confirmed cases, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions) and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression. INTERPRETATION: One in three adults in the predominantly general population have COVID-19 related psychological distress. Concerted efforts are urgently needed for interventions in high-risk populations to reduce urban-rural, socioeconomic and gender disparities in COVID-19 related psychological distress. Public Library of Science 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7769562/ /pubmed/33370404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244630 Text en © 2020 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yeli
Kala, Monica Palanichamy
Jafar, Tazeen H.
Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33370404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244630
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyeli factorsassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemiconthepredominantlygeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kalamonicapalanichamy factorsassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemiconthepredominantlygeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jafartazeenh factorsassociatedwithpsychologicaldistressduringthecoronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemiconthepredominantlygeneralpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis