Cargando…

Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the morphological features in the anterior mandibular region, the presence of lingual foramen and canal dimensions in Saudi subjects that would interfere with standard implant placement. METHODS: CBCT scans of patients seeking implant treatment were examined. Based on the den...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fouda, Shaimaa M., Ellakany, Passant, Madi, Marwa, Zakaria, Osama, Al-Harbi, Fahad A., El Tantawi, Maha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33414691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861301
_version_ 1783629375784091648
author Fouda, Shaimaa M.
Ellakany, Passant
Madi, Marwa
Zakaria, Osama
Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
El Tantawi, Maha
author_facet Fouda, Shaimaa M.
Ellakany, Passant
Madi, Marwa
Zakaria, Osama
Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
El Tantawi, Maha
author_sort Fouda, Shaimaa M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the morphological features in the anterior mandibular region, the presence of lingual foramen and canal dimensions in Saudi subjects that would interfere with standard implant placement. METHODS: CBCT scans of patients seeking implant treatment were examined. Based on the dentition status, patients were categorized into edentulous (group I) and dentulous (group I). On the panoramic view, the distance between the two mental foramina was divided into vertical segments of 10 mm width. In each segment, vertical bone height and buccolingual thickness at three levels (alveolar crest, 5 mm, and 10 mm apical to the crest) were assessed. The lingual foramen prevalence and canal features were assessed as well. Comparisons between the two groups regarding the assessed parameters were performed using the t-test. The percentage of edentulous mandibles with thickness <6 mm corresponding to the standard implant diameter was also calculated. RESULTS: Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, group I consisted of 45 subjects and group II comprised 26 subjects. Bone height and thickness at the crestal level were significantly less in edentulous (I) than dentate mandibles (II) (P < 0.0001). The lingual foramen was detected in 90% of patients. In both groups, males had significantly greater mandibular height than females (P=0.02 and 0.005). At the crestal level, the thickness was <6 mm in 50% of the anterior mandibular segments. CONCLUSION: Half of the edentulous patients may receive normal size implants in the anterior interforaminal segments, while the other half will be limited to narrow implants (3.5 mm and less). The lingual foramen location, canal size, and position may represent another limitation for implant placement in that segment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77696642021-01-06 Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study Fouda, Shaimaa M. Ellakany, Passant Madi, Marwa Zakaria, Osama Al-Harbi, Fahad A. El Tantawi, Maha ScientificWorldJournal Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the morphological features in the anterior mandibular region, the presence of lingual foramen and canal dimensions in Saudi subjects that would interfere with standard implant placement. METHODS: CBCT scans of patients seeking implant treatment were examined. Based on the dentition status, patients were categorized into edentulous (group I) and dentulous (group I). On the panoramic view, the distance between the two mental foramina was divided into vertical segments of 10 mm width. In each segment, vertical bone height and buccolingual thickness at three levels (alveolar crest, 5 mm, and 10 mm apical to the crest) were assessed. The lingual foramen prevalence and canal features were assessed as well. Comparisons between the two groups regarding the assessed parameters were performed using the t-test. The percentage of edentulous mandibles with thickness <6 mm corresponding to the standard implant diameter was also calculated. RESULTS: Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, group I consisted of 45 subjects and group II comprised 26 subjects. Bone height and thickness at the crestal level were significantly less in edentulous (I) than dentate mandibles (II) (P < 0.0001). The lingual foramen was detected in 90% of patients. In both groups, males had significantly greater mandibular height than females (P=0.02 and 0.005). At the crestal level, the thickness was <6 mm in 50% of the anterior mandibular segments. CONCLUSION: Half of the edentulous patients may receive normal size implants in the anterior interforaminal segments, while the other half will be limited to narrow implants (3.5 mm and less). The lingual foramen location, canal size, and position may represent another limitation for implant placement in that segment. Hindawi 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7769664/ /pubmed/33414691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861301 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shaimaa M. Fouda et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fouda, Shaimaa M.
Ellakany, Passant
Madi, Marwa
Zakaria, Osama
Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
El Tantawi, Maha
Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Do Morphological Changes in the Anterior Mandibular Region Interfere with Standard Implant Placement? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort do morphological changes in the anterior mandibular region interfere with standard implant placement? a cone beam computed tomographic cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33414691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8861301
work_keys_str_mv AT foudashaimaam domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy
AT ellakanypassant domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy
AT madimarwa domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy
AT zakariaosama domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy
AT alharbifahada domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy
AT eltantawimaha domorphologicalchangesintheanteriormandibularregioninterferewithstandardimplantplacementaconebeamcomputedtomographiccrosssectionalstudy