Cargando…
Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017
Background: In this study, we aimed to estimate the equity and efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health resource allocation, utilization, and trend in mainland China from 2013 to 2017. Methods: The data were downloaded from the China Health Statistical Yearbook (2014–2018) and the Chi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.579269 |
_version_ | 1783629407237177344 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhengjun Yang, Lili Tang, Shaoliang Bian, Yaoyao |
author_facet | Li, Zhengjun Yang, Lili Tang, Shaoliang Bian, Yaoyao |
author_sort | Li, Zhengjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In this study, we aimed to estimate the equity and efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health resource allocation, utilization, and trend in mainland China from 2013 to 2017. Methods: The data were downloaded from the China Health Statistical Yearbook (2014–2018) and the China Statistical Yearbook (2018). The equity of TCM health resource allocation was evaluated through the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient (G), and Theil index (T) based on population size and geographical area. The efficiency and productivity of TCM health resource utilization were assessed using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. Results: TCM health resource had an increasing trend every year. The equity allocated by population (G ranging from 0.1 to 0.3) was better than that by geographic region (G > 0.5). T in the intra-groups was higher than those in the inter-groups. The equity of TCM resource allocation was the middle region > eastern region > western region. Most provinces (29 out of 31) had negative productivity changes, suggesting deterioration in productivity. Moreover, the middle region with higher scale sizes had more redundant inputs than the other two regions. However, the low technological development (all technical values <1) might hinder productive progress. Conclusion: The equity of TCM health allocated by the population was better than that by the geographic region. The intra-regional difference was the main reason for inequity sources. Productivities in more than 97% of provinces are inefficient. The frequency distribution of scale efficiency (score > 1) had increased since 2015. However, the frequency distribution of technical change (score > 1) decreased every year. The slow technological progress and low scale size might be the main reasons for low productivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7769806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77698062020-12-30 Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 Li, Zhengjun Yang, Lili Tang, Shaoliang Bian, Yaoyao Front Public Health Public Health Background: In this study, we aimed to estimate the equity and efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health resource allocation, utilization, and trend in mainland China from 2013 to 2017. Methods: The data were downloaded from the China Health Statistical Yearbook (2014–2018) and the China Statistical Yearbook (2018). The equity of TCM health resource allocation was evaluated through the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient (G), and Theil index (T) based on population size and geographical area. The efficiency and productivity of TCM health resource utilization were assessed using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. Results: TCM health resource had an increasing trend every year. The equity allocated by population (G ranging from 0.1 to 0.3) was better than that by geographic region (G > 0.5). T in the intra-groups was higher than those in the inter-groups. The equity of TCM resource allocation was the middle region > eastern region > western region. Most provinces (29 out of 31) had negative productivity changes, suggesting deterioration in productivity. Moreover, the middle region with higher scale sizes had more redundant inputs than the other two regions. However, the low technological development (all technical values <1) might hinder productive progress. Conclusion: The equity of TCM health allocated by the population was better than that by the geographic region. The intra-regional difference was the main reason for inequity sources. Productivities in more than 97% of provinces are inefficient. The frequency distribution of scale efficiency (score > 1) had increased since 2015. However, the frequency distribution of technical change (score > 1) decreased every year. The slow technological progress and low scale size might be the main reasons for low productivity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7769806/ /pubmed/33384979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.579269 Text en Copyright © 2020 Li, Yang, Tang and Bian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Li, Zhengjun Yang, Lili Tang, Shaoliang Bian, Yaoyao Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title | Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title_full | Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title_fullStr | Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title_short | Equity and Efficiency of Health Resource Allocation of Chinese Medicine in Mainland China: 2013–2017 |
title_sort | equity and efficiency of health resource allocation of chinese medicine in mainland china: 2013–2017 |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.579269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhengjun equityandefficiencyofhealthresourceallocationofchinesemedicineinmainlandchina20132017 AT yanglili equityandefficiencyofhealthresourceallocationofchinesemedicineinmainlandchina20132017 AT tangshaoliang equityandefficiencyofhealthresourceallocationofchinesemedicineinmainlandchina20132017 AT bianyaoyao equityandefficiencyofhealthresourceallocationofchinesemedicineinmainlandchina20132017 |