Cargando…

Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study

Introduction: Incisional hernia development after open abdomen therapy (OAT) remains a common complication in the long run. To demonstrate the feasibility, we describe our method of prophylactic onlay mesh implantation with definitive fascial closure after open abdomen therapy (PROMOAT). To display...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaaf, Sebastian, Schwab, Robert, Güsgen, Christoph, Willms, Arnulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33385010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.578565
_version_ 1783629413081939968
author Schaaf, Sebastian
Schwab, Robert
Güsgen, Christoph
Willms, Arnulf
author_facet Schaaf, Sebastian
Schwab, Robert
Güsgen, Christoph
Willms, Arnulf
author_sort Schaaf, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Incisional hernia development after open abdomen therapy (OAT) remains a common complication in the long run. To demonstrate the feasibility, we describe our method of prophylactic onlay mesh implantation with definitive fascial closure after open abdomen therapy (PROMOAT). To display the feasibility of this concept, we evaluated the short-term outcome after absorbable and non-absorbable synthetic mesh implantation as prophylactic onlay. Material and Methods: Ten patients were prospectively enrolled, and prophylactic onlay mesh (long-term absorbable or non-absorbable) was implanted at the definitive fascial closure operation. The cohort was followed up with a special focus on incisional hernia development and complications. Results: OAT duration was 21.0 ± 12.6 days (95% CI: 16.9–25.1). Definitive fascial closure was achieved in all cases. No incisional hernias were present during a follow-up interval of 12.4 ± 10.8 months (range 1–30 months). Two seromas and one infected hematoma occurred. The outcome did not differ between mesh types. Conclusion: The prophylactic onlay mesh implantation of alloplastic, long-term absorbable, or non-absorbable meshes in OAT showed promising results and only a few complications that were of minor concern. Incisional hernias did not occur during follow-up. To validate the feasibility and safety of prophylactic onlay mesh implantation long-term data and large-scaled prospective trials are needed to give recommendations on prophylactic onlay mesh implantation after OAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7769831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77698312020-12-30 Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study Schaaf, Sebastian Schwab, Robert Güsgen, Christoph Willms, Arnulf Front Surg Surgery Introduction: Incisional hernia development after open abdomen therapy (OAT) remains a common complication in the long run. To demonstrate the feasibility, we describe our method of prophylactic onlay mesh implantation with definitive fascial closure after open abdomen therapy (PROMOAT). To display the feasibility of this concept, we evaluated the short-term outcome after absorbable and non-absorbable synthetic mesh implantation as prophylactic onlay. Material and Methods: Ten patients were prospectively enrolled, and prophylactic onlay mesh (long-term absorbable or non-absorbable) was implanted at the definitive fascial closure operation. The cohort was followed up with a special focus on incisional hernia development and complications. Results: OAT duration was 21.0 ± 12.6 days (95% CI: 16.9–25.1). Definitive fascial closure was achieved in all cases. No incisional hernias were present during a follow-up interval of 12.4 ± 10.8 months (range 1–30 months). Two seromas and one infected hematoma occurred. The outcome did not differ between mesh types. Conclusion: The prophylactic onlay mesh implantation of alloplastic, long-term absorbable, or non-absorbable meshes in OAT showed promising results and only a few complications that were of minor concern. Incisional hernias did not occur during follow-up. To validate the feasibility and safety of prophylactic onlay mesh implantation long-term data and large-scaled prospective trials are needed to give recommendations on prophylactic onlay mesh implantation after OAT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7769831/ /pubmed/33385010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.578565 Text en Copyright © 2020 Schaaf, Schwab, Güsgen and Willms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Schaaf, Sebastian
Schwab, Robert
Güsgen, Christoph
Willms, Arnulf
Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title_full Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title_short Prophylactic Onlay Mesh Implantation During Definitive Fascial Closure After Open Abdomen Therapy (PROMOAT): Absorbable or Non-absorbable? Methodical Description and Results of a Feasibility Study
title_sort prophylactic onlay mesh implantation during definitive fascial closure after open abdomen therapy (promoat): absorbable or non-absorbable? methodical description and results of a feasibility study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33385010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.578565
work_keys_str_mv AT schaafsebastian prophylacticonlaymeshimplantationduringdefinitivefascialclosureafteropenabdomentherapypromoatabsorbableornonabsorbablemethodicaldescriptionandresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT schwabrobert prophylacticonlaymeshimplantationduringdefinitivefascialclosureafteropenabdomentherapypromoatabsorbableornonabsorbablemethodicaldescriptionandresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT gusgenchristoph prophylacticonlaymeshimplantationduringdefinitivefascialclosureafteropenabdomentherapypromoatabsorbableornonabsorbablemethodicaldescriptionandresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT willmsarnulf prophylacticonlaymeshimplantationduringdefinitivefascialclosureafteropenabdomentherapypromoatabsorbableornonabsorbablemethodicaldescriptionandresultsofafeasibilitystudy