Cargando…

Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the immediate implantation of maxillary central incisors, the height of the alveolar bone is lost, and there is often a risk of bone fracture due to the thin buccal bone wall (BBW). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of smoking, age, and root position in the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Duoling, Xie, Chengjie, Yu, Huimin, Zhang, Zhiyong, Zheng, Junfa, Xu, Shulan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.021
_version_ 1783629476002791424
author Xu, Duoling
Xie, Chengjie
Yu, Huimin
Zhang, Zhiyong
Zheng, Junfa
Xu, Shulan
author_facet Xu, Duoling
Xie, Chengjie
Yu, Huimin
Zhang, Zhiyong
Zheng, Junfa
Xu, Shulan
author_sort Xu, Duoling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the immediate implantation of maxillary central incisors, the height of the alveolar bone is lost, and there is often a risk of bone fracture due to the thin buccal bone wall (BBW). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of smoking, age, and root position in the alveolar bone on the BBW and the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the facial bone crest (FBC) of Chinese maxillary central incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were divided by smoking, gender, age, and root sagittal position in the alveolar bone. BBW thickness was measured at the following sites: the 4 mm apical to the CEJ, the middle of the root, and the apex. The distance from the CEJ to the FBC was also evaluated. RESULTS: Cone beam CT (CBCT) data for the maxillary central incisors of 645 patients (323 males and 322 females) were selected and analyzed. The CEJ-FBC distance in patients who smoked (2.79 ± 0.78 mm) was significantly greater than that of non-smokers (2.54 ± 0.69 mm). The BBW in subtype III (0.74 ± 0.43 mm, 0.81 ± 0.36 mm) was thinner than that in subtypes I and II at 4 mm apical to the CEJ and in the middle of the root, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In most Chinese people, smoking, gender, age, and the position of the root in alveolar bone are all important factors that must be considered before immediate implantation is undertaken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7770285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77702852020-12-30 Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT Xu, Duoling Xie, Chengjie Yu, Huimin Zhang, Zhiyong Zheng, Junfa Xu, Shulan J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the immediate implantation of maxillary central incisors, the height of the alveolar bone is lost, and there is often a risk of bone fracture due to the thin buccal bone wall (BBW). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of smoking, age, and root position in the alveolar bone on the BBW and the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the facial bone crest (FBC) of Chinese maxillary central incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were divided by smoking, gender, age, and root sagittal position in the alveolar bone. BBW thickness was measured at the following sites: the 4 mm apical to the CEJ, the middle of the root, and the apex. The distance from the CEJ to the FBC was also evaluated. RESULTS: Cone beam CT (CBCT) data for the maxillary central incisors of 645 patients (323 males and 322 females) were selected and analyzed. The CEJ-FBC distance in patients who smoked (2.79 ± 0.78 mm) was significantly greater than that of non-smokers (2.54 ± 0.69 mm). The BBW in subtype III (0.74 ± 0.43 mm, 0.81 ± 0.36 mm) was thinner than that in subtypes I and II at 4 mm apical to the CEJ and in the middle of the root, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In most Chinese people, smoking, gender, age, and the position of the root in alveolar bone are all important factors that must be considered before immediate implantation is undertaken. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2021-01 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7770285/ /pubmed/33384802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.021 Text en © 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Duoling
Xie, Chengjie
Yu, Huimin
Zhang, Zhiyong
Zheng, Junfa
Xu, Shulan
Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title_full Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title_fullStr Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title_short Evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in Chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam CT
title_sort evaluation of factors affecting alveolar ridge height and facial bone thickness in chinese maxillary central incisors by cone beam ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.021
work_keys_str_mv AT xuduoling evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct
AT xiechengjie evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct
AT yuhuimin evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct
AT zhangzhiyong evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct
AT zhengjunfa evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct
AT xushulan evaluationoffactorsaffectingalveolarridgeheightandfacialbonethicknessinchinesemaxillarycentralincisorsbyconebeamct