Cargando…

Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast

Malassezia is a lipid-dependent commensal yeast of the human skin. The different culture media and skin sampling methods used to grow these fastidious yeasts are a source of heterogeneity in culture-based epidemiological study results. This study aimed to compare the performances of three methods of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdillah, Abdourahim, Khelaifia, Saber, Raoult, Didier, Bittar, Fadi, Ranque, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6040350
_version_ 1783629542180519936
author Abdillah, Abdourahim
Khelaifia, Saber
Raoult, Didier
Bittar, Fadi
Ranque, Stéphane
author_facet Abdillah, Abdourahim
Khelaifia, Saber
Raoult, Didier
Bittar, Fadi
Ranque, Stéphane
author_sort Abdillah, Abdourahim
collection PubMed
description Malassezia is a lipid-dependent commensal yeast of the human skin. The different culture media and skin sampling methods used to grow these fastidious yeasts are a source of heterogeneity in culture-based epidemiological study results. This study aimed to compare the performances of three methods of skin sampling, and two culture media for the detection of Malassezia yeasts by culture from the human skin. Three skin sampling methods, namely sterile gauze, dry swab, and Transwab(TM) with transport medium, were applied on 10 healthy volunteers at 5 distinct body sites. Each sample was further inoculated onto either the novel FastFung medium or the reference Dixon agar for the detection of Malassezia spp. by culture. At least one colony of Malassezia spp. grew on 93/300 (31%) of the cultures, corresponding to 150 samplings. The positive culture rate was 67%, 18%, and 15% (P < 10(−3)), for samples collected with sterile gauze, Transwab(TM), and dry swab, respectively. The positive culture rate was 62% and 38% (P < 0.003) by using the FastFung and the Dixon media, respectively. Our results showed that sterile gauze rubbing skin sampling followed by inoculation on FastFung medium should be implemented in the routine clinical laboratory procedure for Malassezia spp. cultivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7770598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77705982020-12-30 Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast Abdillah, Abdourahim Khelaifia, Saber Raoult, Didier Bittar, Fadi Ranque, Stéphane J Fungi (Basel) Communication Malassezia is a lipid-dependent commensal yeast of the human skin. The different culture media and skin sampling methods used to grow these fastidious yeasts are a source of heterogeneity in culture-based epidemiological study results. This study aimed to compare the performances of three methods of skin sampling, and two culture media for the detection of Malassezia yeasts by culture from the human skin. Three skin sampling methods, namely sterile gauze, dry swab, and Transwab(TM) with transport medium, were applied on 10 healthy volunteers at 5 distinct body sites. Each sample was further inoculated onto either the novel FastFung medium or the reference Dixon agar for the detection of Malassezia spp. by culture. At least one colony of Malassezia spp. grew on 93/300 (31%) of the cultures, corresponding to 150 samplings. The positive culture rate was 67%, 18%, and 15% (P < 10(−3)), for samples collected with sterile gauze, Transwab(TM), and dry swab, respectively. The positive culture rate was 62% and 38% (P < 0.003) by using the FastFung and the Dixon media, respectively. Our results showed that sterile gauze rubbing skin sampling followed by inoculation on FastFung medium should be implemented in the routine clinical laboratory procedure for Malassezia spp. cultivation. MDPI 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7770598/ /pubmed/33316902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6040350 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Abdillah, Abdourahim
Khelaifia, Saber
Raoult, Didier
Bittar, Fadi
Ranque, Stéphane
Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title_full Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title_short Comparison of Three Skin Sampling Methods and Two Media for Culturing Malassezia Yeast
title_sort comparison of three skin sampling methods and two media for culturing malassezia yeast
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6040350
work_keys_str_mv AT abdillahabdourahim comparisonofthreeskinsamplingmethodsandtwomediaforculturingmalasseziayeast
AT khelaifiasaber comparisonofthreeskinsamplingmethodsandtwomediaforculturingmalasseziayeast
AT raoultdidier comparisonofthreeskinsamplingmethodsandtwomediaforculturingmalasseziayeast
AT bittarfadi comparisonofthreeskinsamplingmethodsandtwomediaforculturingmalasseziayeast
AT ranquestephane comparisonofthreeskinsamplingmethodsandtwomediaforculturingmalasseziayeast