Cargando…

Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age

Selection of replacements for the sow herd is one of the most important facets in swine production. Although our current methods of selection are effective, there is still a large amount of variation in sow reproductive performance traits such as pigs per sow per year (PSY). Therefore, the objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Kayla M, Schinckel, Allan P, Stevens, Jebadiah G, Casey, Theresa M, Stewart, Kara R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa210
_version_ 1783629546031939584
author Mills, Kayla M
Schinckel, Allan P
Stevens, Jebadiah G
Casey, Theresa M
Stewart, Kara R
author_facet Mills, Kayla M
Schinckel, Allan P
Stevens, Jebadiah G
Casey, Theresa M
Stewart, Kara R
author_sort Mills, Kayla M
collection PubMed
description Selection of replacements for the sow herd is one of the most important facets in swine production. Although our current methods of selection are effective, there is still a large amount of variation in sow reproductive performance traits such as pigs per sow per year (PSY). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if on-farm phenotypic traits at 21 d postnatal (PN) or perinatal environmental factors could predict sow reproductive performance. Data were prospectively collected from 2,146 gilts born on a commercial sow production facility and included birth and weaning weights, vulva length and width at 21 d PN, birth and nursing litter size, days nursed, average daily gain from birth to weaning, and age at first estrus. Of the initial animals, 400 (17%) were selected for the sow herd, 353 remained after removal of animals culled for non-reproductive reasons. Animals were assigned to 1 of 5 reproductive performance categories based on observation of estrus or pigs per sow per year (PSY) across two farrowings: High Fertility (HF; 23%; n = 82; ≥26 PSY), Middle Fertility (MF2; 12%; n = 43; 20–25 PSY), Low Fertility (MF3; 15%; n = 54; <20 PSY), Infertile-Estrus (IFe; 10%; n = 36; estrus, no pregnancy), and Infertile-No Estrus (IFno; 39%; n = 138; no estrus, no pregnancy). Generalized linear model analysis indicated vulva width (P = 0.03) was related to PSY, however, it only explained 1.5% of the total variation in PSY. To determine if preweaning variables were predictive of gilt fertility outcome, animals were grouped as those that became pregnant (n = 179) or not (n = 174). Vulva width tended to be greater in fertile animals versus infertile (P = 0.07). Binomial regression analysis revealed a positive relationship between vulva width and gilt fertility, however, this relationship is not strong enough to make sow herd selection decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7770622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77706222021-01-05 Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age Mills, Kayla M Schinckel, Allan P Stevens, Jebadiah G Casey, Theresa M Stewart, Kara R Transl Anim Sci Reproduction Selection of replacements for the sow herd is one of the most important facets in swine production. Although our current methods of selection are effective, there is still a large amount of variation in sow reproductive performance traits such as pigs per sow per year (PSY). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if on-farm phenotypic traits at 21 d postnatal (PN) or perinatal environmental factors could predict sow reproductive performance. Data were prospectively collected from 2,146 gilts born on a commercial sow production facility and included birth and weaning weights, vulva length and width at 21 d PN, birth and nursing litter size, days nursed, average daily gain from birth to weaning, and age at first estrus. Of the initial animals, 400 (17%) were selected for the sow herd, 353 remained after removal of animals culled for non-reproductive reasons. Animals were assigned to 1 of 5 reproductive performance categories based on observation of estrus or pigs per sow per year (PSY) across two farrowings: High Fertility (HF; 23%; n = 82; ≥26 PSY), Middle Fertility (MF2; 12%; n = 43; 20–25 PSY), Low Fertility (MF3; 15%; n = 54; <20 PSY), Infertile-Estrus (IFe; 10%; n = 36; estrus, no pregnancy), and Infertile-No Estrus (IFno; 39%; n = 138; no estrus, no pregnancy). Generalized linear model analysis indicated vulva width (P = 0.03) was related to PSY, however, it only explained 1.5% of the total variation in PSY. To determine if preweaning variables were predictive of gilt fertility outcome, animals were grouped as those that became pregnant (n = 179) or not (n = 174). Vulva width tended to be greater in fertile animals versus infertile (P = 0.07). Binomial regression analysis revealed a positive relationship between vulva width and gilt fertility, however, this relationship is not strong enough to make sow herd selection decisions. Oxford University Press 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7770622/ /pubmed/33409465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa210 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reproduction
Mills, Kayla M
Schinckel, Allan P
Stevens, Jebadiah G
Casey, Theresa M
Stewart, Kara R
Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title_full Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title_fullStr Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title_short Evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
title_sort evaluation of on-farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age
topic Reproduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa210
work_keys_str_mv AT millskaylam evaluationofonfarmindicatorsofgiltreproductiveperformancepotentialat21daysofage
AT schinckelallanp evaluationofonfarmindicatorsofgiltreproductiveperformancepotentialat21daysofage
AT stevensjebadiahg evaluationofonfarmindicatorsofgiltreproductiveperformancepotentialat21daysofage
AT caseytheresam evaluationofonfarmindicatorsofgiltreproductiveperformancepotentialat21daysofage
AT stewartkarar evaluationofonfarmindicatorsofgiltreproductiveperformancepotentialat21daysofage