Cargando…

Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BACKGROUND: Donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) level correlates with allograft injury with clinical validity and utility for quiescence and active acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed trends in dd-cfDNA level immediately preceding and during the coronavirus disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potter, Steven R., Hinojosa, Randall, Miles, Cliff D., O’Brien, Dan, Ross, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Nephrology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303727
http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.107
_version_ 1783629627655192576
author Potter, Steven R.
Hinojosa, Randall
Miles, Cliff D.
O’Brien, Dan
Ross, David J.
author_facet Potter, Steven R.
Hinojosa, Randall
Miles, Cliff D.
O’Brien, Dan
Ross, David J.
author_sort Potter, Steven R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) level correlates with allograft injury with clinical validity and utility for quiescence and active acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed trends in dd-cfDNA level immediately preceding and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with implemented “shelter in place” and a tele-health strategy with remote home phlebotomy to limit COVID-19 exposure. METHODS: During COVID-19 in the United States (US), we surveyed weekly (January 6, 2020-May 25, 2020) metrics for dd-cfDNA corresponding to both a low risk for active rejection (dd-cfDNA < 0.5%) and cohorts with indeterminate levels of 0.5% to 1.0% and > 1.0%. During the study timeframe, over 11,000 patient samples (67%) from 150 kidney transplantation centers were transitioned from standard facility-based to remote phlebotomy. RESULTS: The proportion of dd-cfDNA samples, analyzed in 21 weekly aggregated cohorts by risk-stratification category, was unchanged during the COVID-19 escalation in the US. Linearized slopes for numbers of samples corresponding to indeterminate risk for AR cohorts of > 1.0% and 0.5% to 1.0% were -0.31 and -0.12, respectively; indicating that prevalence of these “at risk for AR cohorts” decreased during remote surveillance. Approximately 73% of samples corresponded to low risk of AR (dd-cfDNA < 0.5%), while an additional 15% of samples had dd-cfDNA level ≤ 1.0%. CONCLUSION: The combination of remote home phlebotomy including dd-cfDNA analysis and a tele-health program offer a new paradigm that may substantially improve patient compliance and assuage anxiety regarding the state of kidney allograft health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further prospective multi-center studies with robust outcomes data are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7770990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Nephrology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77709902021-01-05 Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic Potter, Steven R. Hinojosa, Randall Miles, Cliff D. O’Brien, Dan Ross, David J. Kidney Res Clin Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: Donor-derived, cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) level correlates with allograft injury with clinical validity and utility for quiescence and active acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed trends in dd-cfDNA level immediately preceding and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with implemented “shelter in place” and a tele-health strategy with remote home phlebotomy to limit COVID-19 exposure. METHODS: During COVID-19 in the United States (US), we surveyed weekly (January 6, 2020-May 25, 2020) metrics for dd-cfDNA corresponding to both a low risk for active rejection (dd-cfDNA < 0.5%) and cohorts with indeterminate levels of 0.5% to 1.0% and > 1.0%. During the study timeframe, over 11,000 patient samples (67%) from 150 kidney transplantation centers were transitioned from standard facility-based to remote phlebotomy. RESULTS: The proportion of dd-cfDNA samples, analyzed in 21 weekly aggregated cohorts by risk-stratification category, was unchanged during the COVID-19 escalation in the US. Linearized slopes for numbers of samples corresponding to indeterminate risk for AR cohorts of > 1.0% and 0.5% to 1.0% were -0.31 and -0.12, respectively; indicating that prevalence of these “at risk for AR cohorts” decreased during remote surveillance. Approximately 73% of samples corresponded to low risk of AR (dd-cfDNA < 0.5%), while an additional 15% of samples had dd-cfDNA level ≤ 1.0%. CONCLUSION: The combination of remote home phlebotomy including dd-cfDNA analysis and a tele-health program offer a new paradigm that may substantially improve patient compliance and assuage anxiety regarding the state of kidney allograft health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further prospective multi-center studies with robust outcomes data are warranted. Korean Society of Nephrology 2020-12-31 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7770990/ /pubmed/33303727 http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.107 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Nephrology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Potter, Steven R.
Hinojosa, Randall
Miles, Cliff D.
O’Brien, Dan
Ross, David J.
Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_full Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_fullStr Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_short Remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free DNA after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_sort remote monitoring using donor-derived, cell-free dna after kidney transplantation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303727
http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.107
work_keys_str_mv AT potterstevenr remotemonitoringusingdonorderivedcellfreednaafterkidneytransplantationduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT hinojosarandall remotemonitoringusingdonorderivedcellfreednaafterkidneytransplantationduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT milescliffd remotemonitoringusingdonorderivedcellfreednaafterkidneytransplantationduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT obriendan remotemonitoringusingdonorderivedcellfreednaafterkidneytransplantationduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT rossdavidj remotemonitoringusingdonorderivedcellfreednaafterkidneytransplantationduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic