Cargando…

Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors

BACKGROUND: We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-standa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambrosi, Francesca, Ricci, Costantino, Malvi, Deborah, Cillia, Carlo De, Ravaioli, Matteo, Fiorentino, Michelangelo, Cardillo, Massimo, Vasuri, Francesco, D’Errico, Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Nephrology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855366
http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050
_version_ 1783629627889025024
author Ambrosi, Francesca
Ricci, Costantino
Malvi, Deborah
Cillia, Carlo De
Ravaioli, Matteo
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Cardillo, Massimo
Vasuri, Francesco
D’Errico, Antonia
author_facet Ambrosi, Francesca
Ricci, Costantino
Malvi, Deborah
Cillia, Carlo De
Ravaioli, Matteo
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Cardillo, Massimo
Vasuri, Francesco
D’Errico, Antonia
author_sort Ambrosi, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-standard donors with a negligible risk of cancer transmission. METHODS: From the revision of our registries, 2,406 donors were considered in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy; organs were accepted from 1,321 individuals for a total of 3,406 organs. RESULTS: The evaluation of donor safety required frozen section analysis for 51 donors, in which a renal suspicious lesion was detected by ultrasound. Thirty-two primary renal tumors were finally diagnosed 26 identified by frozen sections and 6 in discarded kidneys. The 32 tumors included 13 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 6 papillary RCCs, 6 angiomyolipomas, 5 oncocytomas, 1 chromophobe RCC, and 1 papillary adenoma. No cases of tumor transmission were recorded in follow-up of the recipients. CONCLUSION: Donors with small RCCs can be accepted to increase the donor pool. Collaboration in a multidisciplinary setting is fundamental to accurately evaluate donor candidate risk assessment and to improve standardized protocols for surgeons and pathologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7770991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Nephrology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77709912021-01-05 Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors Ambrosi, Francesca Ricci, Costantino Malvi, Deborah Cillia, Carlo De Ravaioli, Matteo Fiorentino, Michelangelo Cardillo, Massimo Vasuri, Francesco D’Errico, Antonia Kidney Res Clin Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-standard donors with a negligible risk of cancer transmission. METHODS: From the revision of our registries, 2,406 donors were considered in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy; organs were accepted from 1,321 individuals for a total of 3,406 organs. RESULTS: The evaluation of donor safety required frozen section analysis for 51 donors, in which a renal suspicious lesion was detected by ultrasound. Thirty-two primary renal tumors were finally diagnosed 26 identified by frozen sections and 6 in discarded kidneys. The 32 tumors included 13 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 6 papillary RCCs, 6 angiomyolipomas, 5 oncocytomas, 1 chromophobe RCC, and 1 papillary adenoma. No cases of tumor transmission were recorded in follow-up of the recipients. CONCLUSION: Donors with small RCCs can be accepted to increase the donor pool. Collaboration in a multidisciplinary setting is fundamental to accurately evaluate donor candidate risk assessment and to improve standardized protocols for surgeons and pathologists. Korean Society of Nephrology 2020-12-31 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7770991/ /pubmed/32855366 http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Korean Society of Nephrology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ambrosi, Francesca
Ricci, Costantino
Malvi, Deborah
Cillia, Carlo De
Ravaioli, Matteo
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Cardillo, Massimo
Vasuri, Francesco
D’Errico, Antonia
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title_full Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title_fullStr Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title_full_unstemmed Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title_short Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
title_sort pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7770991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855366
http://dx.doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050
work_keys_str_mv AT ambrosifrancesca pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT riccicostantino pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT malvideborah pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT cilliacarlode pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT ravaiolimatteo pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT fiorentinomichelangelo pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT cardillomassimo pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT vasurifrancesco pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors
AT derricoantonia pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors