Cargando…

The fluid challenge

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Vincent, Jean-Louis, Cecconi, Maurizio, De Backer, Daniel
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03443-y

Ejemplares similares

Is this patient really “(un)stable”? How to describe cardiovascular dynamics in critically ill patients
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Erratum to: Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Corticosteroids in severe COVID-19: a critical view of the evidence
por: De Backer, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Pathophysiology of fluid administration in critically ill patients
por: Messina, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions
por: De Backer, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

We should avoid the term “fluid overload”
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reflections of an intensivist in 2050: three decades of clinical practice, research, and human connection
por: Cecconi, Maurizio
Publicado: (2023)

What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Toscani, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

High mixed venous oxygen saturation levels do not exclude fluid responsiveness in critically ill septic patients
por: Velissaris, Dimitrios, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Kinetics of volume expansion during a fluid challenge
por: Aya, H, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Minimal volume for a fluid challenge in postoperative patients
por: Aya, H, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Can surgical outcomes be prevented by postoperative admission to critical care?
por: Rhodes, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

We wish you a smooth takeoff! Launching “Intensive Care Fundamentals”: an ESICM educational initiative for newcomers to intensive care unit
por: Duska, Frantisek, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
por: Messina, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of Fluids on the Macro- and Microcirculations
por: Bennett, Victoria A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock
por: De Backer, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Diversity and inclusivity: the way to multidisciplinary intensive care medicine in Europe
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid!
por: Monnet, Xavier, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Perioperative fluid management: From physiology to improving clinical outcomes
por: Bennett, Victoria A, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effects of fluid administration on renal perfusion in critically ill patients
por: Moussa, Mouhamed Djahoum, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Education to save lives: C19SPACE, the COVID19 Skills PrepAration CoursE
por: Schaller, Stefan J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Critical care journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and responsibilities
por: Citerio, Giuseppe, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring
por: Messina, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Brain barriers and brain fluid research in 2016: advances, challenges and controversies
por: Keep, Richard F., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Amniotic Fluid and Placental Membranes as Sources of Stem Cells: Progress and Challenges
por: Maraldi, Tullia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness
por: Messina, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Microvascular dysfunction as a cause of organ dysfunction in severe sepsis
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

The International Sepsis Forum's controversies in sepsis: my initial vasopressor agent in septic shock is dopamine rather than norepinephrine
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Saline versus balanced solutions: are clinical trials comparing two crystalloid solutions really needed?
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Understanding Hyperlactatemia in Human Sepsis: Are We Making Progress?
por: De Backer, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Frank-Starling and Guyton together at bedside during a fluid challenge
por: Aya, H, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Hemodynamic Monitoring Today
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades
por: Messina, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Changes On Mean Systemic Filling Pressure And Microcirculation After a Fluid Challenge
por: Aya, HD, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Skin microcirculatory reactivity assessed using a thermal challenge is decreased in patients with circulatory shock and associated with outcome
por: Orbegozo, Diego, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial
por: Kattan, Eduardo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can passive leg raising be used to guide fluid administration?
por: De Backer, Daniel
Publicado: (2006)

Equilibrating SSC guidelines with individualized care
por: Vincent, Jean-Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_e5r460978c9bqufq36kpabd8r6