Cargando…

An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases

BACKGROUND: Proteases are key drivers in many biological processes, in part due to their specificity towards their substrates. However, depending on the family and molecular function, they can also display substrate promiscuity which can also be essential. Databases compiling specificity matrices de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochoa, Rodrigo, Magnitov, Mikhail, Laskowski, Roman A., Cossio, Pilar, Thornton, Janet M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03931-6
_version_ 1783629643548459008
author Ochoa, Rodrigo
Magnitov, Mikhail
Laskowski, Roman A.
Cossio, Pilar
Thornton, Janet M.
author_facet Ochoa, Rodrigo
Magnitov, Mikhail
Laskowski, Roman A.
Cossio, Pilar
Thornton, Janet M.
author_sort Ochoa, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proteases are key drivers in many biological processes, in part due to their specificity towards their substrates. However, depending on the family and molecular function, they can also display substrate promiscuity which can also be essential. Databases compiling specificity matrices derived from experimental assays have provided valuable insights into protease substrate recognition. Despite this, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the structural determinants. Here, we compile a set of protease crystal structures with bound peptide-like ligands to create a protocol for modelling substrates bound to protease structures, and for studying observables associated to the binding recognition. RESULTS: As an application, we modelled a subset of protease–peptide complexes for which experimental cleavage data are available to compare with informational entropies obtained from protease–specificity matrices. The modelled complexes were subjected to conformational sampling using the Backrub method in Rosetta, and multiple observables from the simulations were calculated and compared per peptide position. We found that some of the calculated structural observables, such as the relative accessible surface area and the interaction energy, can help characterize a protease’s substrate recognition, giving insights for the potential prediction of novel substrates by combining additional approaches. CONCLUSION: Overall, our approach provides a repository of protease structures with annotated data, and an open source computational protocol to reproduce the modelling and dynamic analysis of the protease–peptide complexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77710862020-12-30 An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases Ochoa, Rodrigo Magnitov, Mikhail Laskowski, Roman A. Cossio, Pilar Thornton, Janet M. BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Proteases are key drivers in many biological processes, in part due to their specificity towards their substrates. However, depending on the family and molecular function, they can also display substrate promiscuity which can also be essential. Databases compiling specificity matrices derived from experimental assays have provided valuable insights into protease substrate recognition. Despite this, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the structural determinants. Here, we compile a set of protease crystal structures with bound peptide-like ligands to create a protocol for modelling substrates bound to protease structures, and for studying observables associated to the binding recognition. RESULTS: As an application, we modelled a subset of protease–peptide complexes for which experimental cleavage data are available to compare with informational entropies obtained from protease–specificity matrices. The modelled complexes were subjected to conformational sampling using the Backrub method in Rosetta, and multiple observables from the simulations were calculated and compared per peptide position. We found that some of the calculated structural observables, such as the relative accessible surface area and the interaction energy, can help characterize a protease’s substrate recognition, giving insights for the potential prediction of novel substrates by combining additional approaches. CONCLUSION: Overall, our approach provides a repository of protease structures with annotated data, and an open source computational protocol to reproduce the modelling and dynamic analysis of the protease–peptide complexes. BioMed Central 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7771086/ /pubmed/33375946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03931-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Ochoa, Rodrigo
Magnitov, Mikhail
Laskowski, Roman A.
Cossio, Pilar
Thornton, Janet M.
An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title_full An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title_fullStr An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title_full_unstemmed An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title_short An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
title_sort automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03931-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ochoarodrigo anautomatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT magnitovmikhail anautomatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT laskowskiromana anautomatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT cossiopilar anautomatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT thorntonjanetm anautomatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT ochoarodrigo automatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT magnitovmikhail automatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT laskowskiromana automatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT cossiopilar automatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases
AT thorntonjanetm automatedprotocolformodellingpeptidesubstratestoproteases