Cargando…

Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants

In the genus Aphaenogaster, workers use tools to transport liquid food to the colony. During this behavior, ants place or drop various kinds of debris into liquids or soft food, and then, they carry the food‐soaked tools back to the nest. According to some authors, this behavior is not "true&qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Módra, Gábor, Maák, István, Lőrincz, Ádám, Juhász, Orsolya, Kiss, Péter János, Lőrinczi, Gábor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6968
_version_ 1783629653496299520
author Módra, Gábor
Maák, István
Lőrincz, Ádám
Juhász, Orsolya
Kiss, Péter János
Lőrinczi, Gábor
author_facet Módra, Gábor
Maák, István
Lőrincz, Ádám
Juhász, Orsolya
Kiss, Péter János
Lőrinczi, Gábor
author_sort Módra, Gábor
collection PubMed
description In the genus Aphaenogaster, workers use tools to transport liquid food to the colony. During this behavior, ants place or drop various kinds of debris into liquids or soft food, and then, they carry the food‐soaked tools back to the nest. According to some authors, this behavior is not "true" tool use because it represents two separate processes: a defense response to cover the dangerous liquid and a transport of food. Here, we investigated the debris dropping and retrieving behavior of the ant Aphaenogaster subterranea to establish which of the two hypotheses is more probable by conducting manipulative experiments. We tested the responses of eight colonies (a) to liquid food (honey‐water) and nonfood liquids (water) in different distances from the nest and (b) to nonthreatening liquids previously covered or presented as small droplets. We also tested whether the nutritional condition of colonies (i.e., starved or satiated) would affect the intensity and rate of debris dropping. Our results were consistent with the tool‐using behavior hypothesis. Firstly, ants clearly differentiated between honey‐water and water, and they directed more of their foraging effort toward liquids farther from the nest. Secondly, ants performed object dropping even into liquids that did not pose the danger of drowning or becoming entangled. Lastly, the nutritional condition of colonies had a significant effect on the intensity and rate of object dropping, but in the opposite direction than we expected. Our results suggest that the foraging behavior of A. subterranea is more complex than that predicted by the two‐component behavior hypothesis and deserves to be considered as "true" tool use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77711312020-12-31 Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants Módra, Gábor Maák, István Lőrincz, Ádám Juhász, Orsolya Kiss, Péter János Lőrinczi, Gábor Ecol Evol Original Research In the genus Aphaenogaster, workers use tools to transport liquid food to the colony. During this behavior, ants place or drop various kinds of debris into liquids or soft food, and then, they carry the food‐soaked tools back to the nest. According to some authors, this behavior is not "true" tool use because it represents two separate processes: a defense response to cover the dangerous liquid and a transport of food. Here, we investigated the debris dropping and retrieving behavior of the ant Aphaenogaster subterranea to establish which of the two hypotheses is more probable by conducting manipulative experiments. We tested the responses of eight colonies (a) to liquid food (honey‐water) and nonfood liquids (water) in different distances from the nest and (b) to nonthreatening liquids previously covered or presented as small droplets. We also tested whether the nutritional condition of colonies (i.e., starved or satiated) would affect the intensity and rate of debris dropping. Our results were consistent with the tool‐using behavior hypothesis. Firstly, ants clearly differentiated between honey‐water and water, and they directed more of their foraging effort toward liquids farther from the nest. Secondly, ants performed object dropping even into liquids that did not pose the danger of drowning or becoming entangled. Lastly, the nutritional condition of colonies had a significant effect on the intensity and rate of object dropping, but in the opposite direction than we expected. Our results suggest that the foraging behavior of A. subterranea is more complex than that predicted by the two‐component behavior hypothesis and deserves to be considered as "true" tool use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7771131/ /pubmed/33391680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6968 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Módra, Gábor
Maák, István
Lőrincz, Ádám
Juhász, Orsolya
Kiss, Péter János
Lőrinczi, Gábor
Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title_full Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title_fullStr Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title_full_unstemmed Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title_short Protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? Scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
title_sort protective behavior or ‘true’ tool use? scrutinizing the tool use behavior of ants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6968
work_keys_str_mv AT modragabor protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants
AT maakistvan protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants
AT lorinczadam protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants
AT juhaszorsolya protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants
AT kisspeterjanos protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants
AT lorinczigabor protectivebehaviorortruetoolusescrutinizingthetoolusebehaviorofants