Cargando…

Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study

Wildlife restoration often involves translocation efforts to reintroduce species and supplement small, fragmented populations. We examined the genomic consequences of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) translocations and population isolation to enhance understanding of evolutionary processes that affec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flesch, Elizabeth P., Graves, Tabitha A., Thomson, Jennifer M., Proffitt, Kelly M., White, P. J., Stephenson, Thomas R., Garrott, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6942
_version_ 1783629660994666496
author Flesch, Elizabeth P.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Thomson, Jennifer M.
Proffitt, Kelly M.
White, P. J.
Stephenson, Thomas R.
Garrott, Robert A.
author_facet Flesch, Elizabeth P.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Thomson, Jennifer M.
Proffitt, Kelly M.
White, P. J.
Stephenson, Thomas R.
Garrott, Robert A.
author_sort Flesch, Elizabeth P.
collection PubMed
description Wildlife restoration often involves translocation efforts to reintroduce species and supplement small, fragmented populations. We examined the genomic consequences of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) translocations and population isolation to enhance understanding of evolutionary processes that affect population genetics and inform future restoration strategies. We conducted a population genomic analysis of 511 bighorn sheep from 17 areas, including native and reintroduced populations that received 0–10 translocations. Using the Illumina High Density Ovine array, we generated datasets of 6,155 to 33,289 single nucleotide polymorphisms and completed clustering, population tree, and kinship analyses. Our analyses determined that natural gene flow did not occur between most populations, including two pairs of native herds that had past connectivity. We synthesized genomic evidence across analyses to evaluate 24 different translocation events and detected eight successful reintroductions (i.e., lack of signal for recolonization from nearby populations) and five successful augmentations (i.e., reproductive success of translocated individuals) based on genetic similarity with the source populations. A single native population founded six of the reintroduced herds, suggesting that environmental conditions did not need to match for populations to persist following reintroduction. Augmentations consisting of 18–57 animals including males and females succeeded, whereas augmentations of two males did not result in a detectable genetic signature. Our results provide insight on genomic distinctiveness of native and reintroduced herds, information on the relative success of reintroduction and augmentation efforts and their associated attributes, and guidance to enhance genetic contribution of augmentations and reintroductions to aid in bighorn sheep restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77711632020-12-31 Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study Flesch, Elizabeth P. Graves, Tabitha A. Thomson, Jennifer M. Proffitt, Kelly M. White, P. J. Stephenson, Thomas R. Garrott, Robert A. Ecol Evol Original Research Wildlife restoration often involves translocation efforts to reintroduce species and supplement small, fragmented populations. We examined the genomic consequences of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) translocations and population isolation to enhance understanding of evolutionary processes that affect population genetics and inform future restoration strategies. We conducted a population genomic analysis of 511 bighorn sheep from 17 areas, including native and reintroduced populations that received 0–10 translocations. Using the Illumina High Density Ovine array, we generated datasets of 6,155 to 33,289 single nucleotide polymorphisms and completed clustering, population tree, and kinship analyses. Our analyses determined that natural gene flow did not occur between most populations, including two pairs of native herds that had past connectivity. We synthesized genomic evidence across analyses to evaluate 24 different translocation events and detected eight successful reintroductions (i.e., lack of signal for recolonization from nearby populations) and five successful augmentations (i.e., reproductive success of translocated individuals) based on genetic similarity with the source populations. A single native population founded six of the reintroduced herds, suggesting that environmental conditions did not need to match for populations to persist following reintroduction. Augmentations consisting of 18–57 animals including males and females succeeded, whereas augmentations of two males did not result in a detectable genetic signature. Our results provide insight on genomic distinctiveness of native and reintroduced herds, information on the relative success of reintroduction and augmentation efforts and their associated attributes, and guidance to enhance genetic contribution of augmentations and reintroductions to aid in bighorn sheep restoration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7771163/ /pubmed/33391673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6942 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Flesch, Elizabeth P.
Graves, Tabitha A.
Thomson, Jennifer M.
Proffitt, Kelly M.
White, P. J.
Stephenson, Thomas R.
Garrott, Robert A.
Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title_full Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title_fullStr Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title_short Evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: A bighorn sheep case study
title_sort evaluating wildlife translocations using genomics: a bighorn sheep case study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6942
work_keys_str_mv AT fleschelizabethp evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT gravestabithaa evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT thomsonjenniferm evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT proffittkellym evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT whitepj evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT stephensonthomasr evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy
AT garrottroberta evaluatingwildlifetranslocationsusinggenomicsabighornsheepcasestudy