Cargando…

Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis

Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yanjun, Zou, Junliang, Meng, Delong, Dang, Shuina, Zhou, Jinhong, Osborne, Bruce, Ren, Yuanyuan, Liang, Ting, Yu, Keke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965
_version_ 1783629666219720704
author Zhang, Yanjun
Zou, Junliang
Meng, Delong
Dang, Shuina
Zhou, Jinhong
Osborne, Bruce
Ren, Yuanyuan
Liang, Ting
Yu, Keke
author_facet Zhang, Yanjun
Zou, Junliang
Meng, Delong
Dang, Shuina
Zhou, Jinhong
Osborne, Bruce
Ren, Yuanyuan
Liang, Ting
Yu, Keke
author_sort Zhang, Yanjun
collection PubMed
description Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 recently published papers on forest ecosystems using a meta‐analysis approach to investigate the effect of litter inputs on soil respiration and the underlying mechanisms involved. Our results showed that litter inputs had a strong positive impact on soil respiration, labile C availability, and the abundance of soil microorganisms, with less of an impact related to soil moisture and temperature. Overall, soil respiration was increased by 36% and 55%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs. The increase in soil respiration induced by litter inputs showed a tendency for coniferous forests (50.7%)> broad‐leaved forests (41.3%)> mixed forests (31.9%). This stimulation effect also depended on stand age with 30‐ to 100‐year‐old forests (53.3%) and ≥100‐year‐old forests (50.2%) both 1.5 times larger than ≤30‐year‐old forests (34.5%). Soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon increased by 21.0%‐33.6% and 60.3%‐87.7%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs, while soil respiration increased linearly with corresponding increases in soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon. Natural and doubled litter inputs increased the total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) content by 6.6% and 19.7%, respectively, but decreased the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio by 26.9% and 18.7%, respectively. Soil respiration also increased linearly with increases in total PLFA and decreased linearly with decreases in the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio. The contribution of litter inputs to an increase in soil respiration showed a trend of total PLFA > fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio > soil dissolved organic carbon > soil microbial biomass carbon. Therefore, in addition to forest type and stand age, labile C availability and soil microorganisms are also important factors that influence soil respiration in response to litter inputs, with soil microorganisms being more important than labile C availability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77711852020-12-31 Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis Zhang, Yanjun Zou, Junliang Meng, Delong Dang, Shuina Zhou, Jinhong Osborne, Bruce Ren, Yuanyuan Liang, Ting Yu, Keke Ecol Evol Review Articles Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 recently published papers on forest ecosystems using a meta‐analysis approach to investigate the effect of litter inputs on soil respiration and the underlying mechanisms involved. Our results showed that litter inputs had a strong positive impact on soil respiration, labile C availability, and the abundance of soil microorganisms, with less of an impact related to soil moisture and temperature. Overall, soil respiration was increased by 36% and 55%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs. The increase in soil respiration induced by litter inputs showed a tendency for coniferous forests (50.7%)> broad‐leaved forests (41.3%)> mixed forests (31.9%). This stimulation effect also depended on stand age with 30‐ to 100‐year‐old forests (53.3%) and ≥100‐year‐old forests (50.2%) both 1.5 times larger than ≤30‐year‐old forests (34.5%). Soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon increased by 21.0%‐33.6% and 60.3%‐87.7%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs, while soil respiration increased linearly with corresponding increases in soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon. Natural and doubled litter inputs increased the total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) content by 6.6% and 19.7%, respectively, but decreased the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio by 26.9% and 18.7%, respectively. Soil respiration also increased linearly with increases in total PLFA and decreased linearly with decreases in the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio. The contribution of litter inputs to an increase in soil respiration showed a trend of total PLFA > fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio > soil dissolved organic carbon > soil microbial biomass carbon. Therefore, in addition to forest type and stand age, labile C availability and soil microorganisms are also important factors that influence soil respiration in response to litter inputs, with soil microorganisms being more important than labile C availability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7771185/ /pubmed/33391666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Zhang, Yanjun
Zou, Junliang
Meng, Delong
Dang, Shuina
Zhou, Jinhong
Osborne, Bruce
Ren, Yuanyuan
Liang, Ting
Yu, Keke
Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title_full Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title_short Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
title_sort effect of soil microorganisms and labile c availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: a meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyanjun effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT zoujunliang effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT mengdelong effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT dangshuina effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT zhoujinhong effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT osbornebruce effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT renyuanyuan effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT liangting effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis
AT yukeke effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis