Cargando…
Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis
Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965 |
_version_ | 1783629666219720704 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yanjun Zou, Junliang Meng, Delong Dang, Shuina Zhou, Jinhong Osborne, Bruce Ren, Yuanyuan Liang, Ting Yu, Keke |
author_facet | Zhang, Yanjun Zou, Junliang Meng, Delong Dang, Shuina Zhou, Jinhong Osborne, Bruce Ren, Yuanyuan Liang, Ting Yu, Keke |
author_sort | Zhang, Yanjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 recently published papers on forest ecosystems using a meta‐analysis approach to investigate the effect of litter inputs on soil respiration and the underlying mechanisms involved. Our results showed that litter inputs had a strong positive impact on soil respiration, labile C availability, and the abundance of soil microorganisms, with less of an impact related to soil moisture and temperature. Overall, soil respiration was increased by 36% and 55%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs. The increase in soil respiration induced by litter inputs showed a tendency for coniferous forests (50.7%)> broad‐leaved forests (41.3%)> mixed forests (31.9%). This stimulation effect also depended on stand age with 30‐ to 100‐year‐old forests (53.3%) and ≥100‐year‐old forests (50.2%) both 1.5 times larger than ≤30‐year‐old forests (34.5%). Soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon increased by 21.0%‐33.6% and 60.3%‐87.7%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs, while soil respiration increased linearly with corresponding increases in soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon. Natural and doubled litter inputs increased the total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) content by 6.6% and 19.7%, respectively, but decreased the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio by 26.9% and 18.7%, respectively. Soil respiration also increased linearly with increases in total PLFA and decreased linearly with decreases in the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio. The contribution of litter inputs to an increase in soil respiration showed a trend of total PLFA > fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio > soil dissolved organic carbon > soil microbial biomass carbon. Therefore, in addition to forest type and stand age, labile C availability and soil microorganisms are also important factors that influence soil respiration in response to litter inputs, with soil microorganisms being more important than labile C availability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7771185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77711852020-12-31 Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis Zhang, Yanjun Zou, Junliang Meng, Delong Dang, Shuina Zhou, Jinhong Osborne, Bruce Ren, Yuanyuan Liang, Ting Yu, Keke Ecol Evol Review Articles Litter inputs can influence soil respiration directly through labile C availability and, indirectly, through the activity of soil microorganisms and modifications in soil microclimate; however, their relative contributions and the magnitude of any effect remain poorly understood. We synthesized 66 recently published papers on forest ecosystems using a meta‐analysis approach to investigate the effect of litter inputs on soil respiration and the underlying mechanisms involved. Our results showed that litter inputs had a strong positive impact on soil respiration, labile C availability, and the abundance of soil microorganisms, with less of an impact related to soil moisture and temperature. Overall, soil respiration was increased by 36% and 55%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs. The increase in soil respiration induced by litter inputs showed a tendency for coniferous forests (50.7%)> broad‐leaved forests (41.3%)> mixed forests (31.9%). This stimulation effect also depended on stand age with 30‐ to 100‐year‐old forests (53.3%) and ≥100‐year‐old forests (50.2%) both 1.5 times larger than ≤30‐year‐old forests (34.5%). Soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon increased by 21.0%‐33.6% and 60.3%‐87.7%, respectively, in response to natural and doubled litter inputs, while soil respiration increased linearly with corresponding increases in soil microbial biomass carbon and soil dissolved organic carbon. Natural and doubled litter inputs increased the total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) content by 6.6% and 19.7%, respectively, but decreased the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio by 26.9% and 18.7%, respectively. Soil respiration also increased linearly with increases in total PLFA and decreased linearly with decreases in the fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio. The contribution of litter inputs to an increase in soil respiration showed a trend of total PLFA > fungal/bacterial PLFA ratio > soil dissolved organic carbon > soil microbial biomass carbon. Therefore, in addition to forest type and stand age, labile C availability and soil microorganisms are also important factors that influence soil respiration in response to litter inputs, with soil microorganisms being more important than labile C availability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7771185/ /pubmed/33391666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Zhang, Yanjun Zou, Junliang Meng, Delong Dang, Shuina Zhou, Jinhong Osborne, Bruce Ren, Yuanyuan Liang, Ting Yu, Keke Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title | Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Effect of soil microorganisms and labile C availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | effect of soil microorganisms and labile c availability on soil respiration in response to litter inputs in forest ecosystems: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyanjun effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT zoujunliang effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT mengdelong effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT dangshuina effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT zhoujinhong effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT osbornebruce effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT renyuanyuan effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT liangting effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis AT yukeke effectofsoilmicroorganismsandlabilecavailabilityonsoilrespirationinresponsetolitterinputsinforestecosystemsametaanalysis |