Cargando…

Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq, Latief, Abdul, Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18
_version_ 1783629709490257920
author Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq
Latief, Abdul
Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky
author_facet Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq
Latief, Abdul
Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky
author_sort Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume in shock children with mechanical ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2017 to September 2017 in a single center. The selection of subject through consecutive sampling. Measurements of SVV and stroke volume (SV) using USCOM and ICON were performed before and after fluid challenge. The tidal volume of individuals was measured and recorded. RESULTS: Analysis was performed in 45 patients with median age of 14 months and 62.2% of male population. It showed that the sensitivity and specificity of ICON were 58% and 74%, respectively. The optimal cut off point of SVV using ICON was 16.5% and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.9%–70%), P > 0.05 and cut off point of SVV using USCOM was 33.5% with the AUC value was 70% (95% CI 52.9%–87.7%), P < 0.05. The optimal cut off point of tidal volume to fluid responsivenes was 6.8 ml/kg BW and the AUC value was 44.6% (95% CI 27.4%–61.9%), P > 0.05. CONCLUSION: This study showed that electrical cardiometry (ICON) is unable to assess preload and the response of fluid resuscitation in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77716182021-01-05 Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq Latief, Abdul Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume in shock children with mechanical ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2017 to September 2017 in a single center. The selection of subject through consecutive sampling. Measurements of SVV and stroke volume (SV) using USCOM and ICON were performed before and after fluid challenge. The tidal volume of individuals was measured and recorded. RESULTS: Analysis was performed in 45 patients with median age of 14 months and 62.2% of male population. It showed that the sensitivity and specificity of ICON were 58% and 74%, respectively. The optimal cut off point of SVV using ICON was 16.5% and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.9%–70%), P > 0.05 and cut off point of SVV using USCOM was 33.5% with the AUC value was 70% (95% CI 52.9%–87.7%), P < 0.05. The optimal cut off point of tidal volume to fluid responsivenes was 6.8 ml/kg BW and the AUC value was 44.6% (95% CI 27.4%–61.9%), P > 0.05. CONCLUSION: This study showed that electrical cardiometry (ICON) is unable to assess preload and the response of fluid resuscitation in children. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7771618/ /pubmed/33409126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq
Latief, Abdul
Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky
Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title_full Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title_short Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
title_sort determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using icon® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409126
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18
work_keys_str_mv AT kadafikurniawantaufiq determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy
AT latiefabdul determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy
AT pudjiadiantoniushocky determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy