Cargando…
Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study
PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18 |
_version_ | 1783629709490257920 |
---|---|
author | Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq Latief, Abdul Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky |
author_facet | Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq Latief, Abdul Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky |
author_sort | Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume in shock children with mechanical ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2017 to September 2017 in a single center. The selection of subject through consecutive sampling. Measurements of SVV and stroke volume (SV) using USCOM and ICON were performed before and after fluid challenge. The tidal volume of individuals was measured and recorded. RESULTS: Analysis was performed in 45 patients with median age of 14 months and 62.2% of male population. It showed that the sensitivity and specificity of ICON were 58% and 74%, respectively. The optimal cut off point of SVV using ICON was 16.5% and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.9%–70%), P > 0.05 and cut off point of SVV using USCOM was 33.5% with the AUC value was 70% (95% CI 52.9%–87.7%), P < 0.05. The optimal cut off point of tidal volume to fluid responsivenes was 6.8 ml/kg BW and the AUC value was 44.6% (95% CI 27.4%–61.9%), P > 0.05. CONCLUSION: This study showed that electrical cardiometry (ICON) is unable to assess preload and the response of fluid resuscitation in children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7771618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77716182021-01-05 Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq Latief, Abdul Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine the adequacy fluid responsiveness by the validity and cut off point of stroke volume variation (SVV) usingelectrical cardiometry, ICON® (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and to recognize cut off point of tidal volume in shock children with mechanical ventilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2017 to September 2017 in a single center. The selection of subject through consecutive sampling. Measurements of SVV and stroke volume (SV) using USCOM and ICON were performed before and after fluid challenge. The tidal volume of individuals was measured and recorded. RESULTS: Analysis was performed in 45 patients with median age of 14 months and 62.2% of male population. It showed that the sensitivity and specificity of ICON were 58% and 74%, respectively. The optimal cut off point of SVV using ICON was 16.5% and the area under the curve (AUC) value was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.9%–70%), P > 0.05 and cut off point of SVV using USCOM was 33.5% with the AUC value was 70% (95% CI 52.9%–87.7%), P < 0.05. The optimal cut off point of tidal volume to fluid responsivenes was 6.8 ml/kg BW and the AUC value was 44.6% (95% CI 27.4%–61.9%), P > 0.05. CONCLUSION: This study showed that electrical cardiometry (ICON) is unable to assess preload and the response of fluid resuscitation in children. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7771618/ /pubmed/33409126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq Latief, Abdul Pudjiadi, Antonius Hocky Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title | Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using icon® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409126 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_87_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadafikurniawantaufiq determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy AT latiefabdul determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy AT pudjiadiantoniushocky determiningpediatricfluidresponsivenessbystrokevolumevariationanalysisusingiconelectricalcardiometryandultrasoniccardiacoutputmonitoracrosssectionalstudy |