Cargando…

Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Restoring cardiopulmonary circulation with effective chest compression remains the cornerstone of resuscitation, yet real-time compressions may be suboptimal. This project aims to determine whether in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA; population), chest compressions performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Andrew C., Scissum, Kiyoshi, McConnell, Lorena, East, Nathaniel, Vahedian-Azimi, Amir, Sewell, Kerry A., Zehtabchi, Shahriar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_155_20
_version_ 1783629710680391680
author Miller, Andrew C.
Scissum, Kiyoshi
McConnell, Lorena
East, Nathaniel
Vahedian-Azimi, Amir
Sewell, Kerry A.
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
author_facet Miller, Andrew C.
Scissum, Kiyoshi
McConnell, Lorena
East, Nathaniel
Vahedian-Azimi, Amir
Sewell, Kerry A.
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
author_sort Miller, Andrew C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Restoring cardiopulmonary circulation with effective chest compression remains the cornerstone of resuscitation, yet real-time compressions may be suboptimal. This project aims to determine whether in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA; population), chest compressions performed with free-standing audiovisual feedback (AVF) device as compared to standard manual chest compression (comparison) results in improved outcomes, including the sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge (outcomes). METHODS: Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included that enrolled adults (age ≥ 18 years) with IHCA and assessed real-time chest compressions delivered with either the standard manual technique or with AVF from a freestanding device not linked to an automated external defibrillator (AED) or automated compressor. RESULTS: Four clinical trials met inclusion criteria and were included. No ongoing trials were identified. One RCT assessed the Ambu CardioPump (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), whereas three assessed Cardio First Angel™ (Inotech, Nubberg, Germany). No clinical RCTs compared AVF devices head-to-head. Three RCTs were multi-center. Sustained ROSC (4 studies, n = 1064) was improved with AVF use (Relative risk [RR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–2.04), as was survival to hospital discharge (2 studies, n = 922; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.54–2.06) and survival to hospital discharge (3 studies, n = 984; RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.62–2.25). CONCLUSION: The moderate-quality evidence suggests that chest compressions performed using a non-AED free-standing AVF device during resuscitation for IHCA improves sustained ROSC and survival to ICU and hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020157536).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77716232021-01-05 Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis Miller, Andrew C. Scissum, Kiyoshi McConnell, Lorena East, Nathaniel Vahedian-Azimi, Amir Sewell, Kerry A. Zehtabchi, Shahriar Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Review Article OBJECTIVE: Restoring cardiopulmonary circulation with effective chest compression remains the cornerstone of resuscitation, yet real-time compressions may be suboptimal. This project aims to determine whether in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA; population), chest compressions performed with free-standing audiovisual feedback (AVF) device as compared to standard manual chest compression (comparison) results in improved outcomes, including the sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge (outcomes). METHODS: Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included that enrolled adults (age ≥ 18 years) with IHCA and assessed real-time chest compressions delivered with either the standard manual technique or with AVF from a freestanding device not linked to an automated external defibrillator (AED) or automated compressor. RESULTS: Four clinical trials met inclusion criteria and were included. No ongoing trials were identified. One RCT assessed the Ambu CardioPump (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), whereas three assessed Cardio First Angel™ (Inotech, Nubberg, Germany). No clinical RCTs compared AVF devices head-to-head. Three RCTs were multi-center. Sustained ROSC (4 studies, n = 1064) was improved with AVF use (Relative risk [RR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–2.04), as was survival to hospital discharge (2 studies, n = 922; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.54–2.06) and survival to hospital discharge (3 studies, n = 984; RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.62–2.25). CONCLUSION: The moderate-quality evidence suggests that chest compressions performed using a non-AED free-standing AVF device during resuscitation for IHCA improves sustained ROSC and survival to ICU and hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020157536). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7771623/ /pubmed/33409125 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_155_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Miller, Andrew C.
Scissum, Kiyoshi
McConnell, Lorena
East, Nathaniel
Vahedian-Azimi, Amir
Sewell, Kerry A.
Zehtabchi, Shahriar
Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title_full Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title_short Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis
title_sort real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409125
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_155_20
work_keys_str_mv AT millerandrewc realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT scissumkiyoshi realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT mcconnelllorena realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT eastnathaniel realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT vahedianazimiamir realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT sewellkerrya realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis
AT zehtabchishahriar realtimeaudiovisualfeedbackwithhandheldnonautomatedexternaldefibrillatordevicesduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforinhospitalcardiacarrestametaanalysis