Cargando…

Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage

While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croucher, Karina, Büster, Lindsey, Dayes, Jennifer, Green, Laura, Raynsford, Justine, Comerford Boyes, Louise, Faull, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33373412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058
_version_ 1783629721057099776
author Croucher, Karina
Büster, Lindsey
Dayes, Jennifer
Green, Laura
Raynsford, Justine
Comerford Boyes, Louise
Faull, Christina
author_facet Croucher, Karina
Büster, Lindsey
Dayes, Jennifer
Green, Laura
Raynsford, Justine
Comerford Boyes, Louise
Faull, Christina
author_sort Croucher, Karina
collection PubMed
description While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status–‘taboo’ being a theme evident in some participants’ own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77716862021-01-08 Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage Croucher, Karina Büster, Lindsey Dayes, Jennifer Green, Laura Raynsford, Justine Comerford Boyes, Louise Faull, Christina PLoS One Research Article While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status–‘taboo’ being a theme evident in some participants’ own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness. Public Library of Science 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7771686/ /pubmed/33373412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058 Text en © 2020 Croucher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Croucher, Karina
Büster, Lindsey
Dayes, Jennifer
Green, Laura
Raynsford, Justine
Comerford Boyes, Louise
Faull, Christina
Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title_full Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title_fullStr Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title_full_unstemmed Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title_short Archaeology and contemporary death: Using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
title_sort archaeology and contemporary death: using the past to provoke, challenge and engage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33373412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244058
work_keys_str_mv AT croucherkarina archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT busterlindsey archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT dayesjennifer archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT greenlaura archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT raynsfordjustine archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT comerfordboyeslouise archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage
AT faullchristina archaeologyandcontemporarydeathusingthepasttoprovokechallengeandengage