Cargando…

Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018

OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine is used by emergency departments (EDs) to connect patients with specialty consultation and resources not available locally. Despite its utility, uptake of telemedicine in EDs has varied. We studied characteristics associated with telemedicine adoption during a 4‐year period....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zachrison, Kori S., Boggs, Krislyn M., Hayden, Emily M., Cash, Rebecca E., Espinola, Janice A., Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret E., Sullivan, Ashley F., Mehrotra, Ateev, Camargo, Carlos A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12233
_version_ 1783629750097412096
author Zachrison, Kori S.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Hayden, Emily M.
Cash, Rebecca E.
Espinola, Janice A.
Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret E.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Mehrotra, Ateev
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_facet Zachrison, Kori S.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Hayden, Emily M.
Cash, Rebecca E.
Espinola, Janice A.
Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret E.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Mehrotra, Ateev
Camargo, Carlos A.
author_sort Zachrison, Kori S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine is used by emergency departments (EDs) to connect patients with specialty consultation and resources not available locally. Despite its utility, uptake of telemedicine in EDs has varied. We studied characteristics associated with telemedicine adoption during a 4‐year period. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2014 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)–New England survey and follow‐up data from 2016 and 2017 NEDI‐USA and 2018 NEDI‐New England surveys, with data from the Center for Connected Health Policy. Among EDs not using telemedicine in 2014, we examined characteristics associated with adoption by 2018. RESULTS: Of the 159 New England EDs with available data, 80 (50%) and 125 (79%) reported telemedicine receipt in 2014 and 2018, respectively. Among the 79 EDs without telemedicine in 2014, academic EDs were less likely to adopt by 2018 (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.46). State policy environment was not associated with likelihood of adoption. In 2018, all 7 freestanding EDs received telemedicine, whereas only 1 of 9 academic EDs (11%) did. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine use by EDs continues to grow rapidly and by 2018, >3 quarters of EDs in our sample were receiving telemedicine. From 2014 to 2018, the initiation of telemedicine receipt was less common among higher volume and academic EDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7771831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77718312020-12-31 Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018 Zachrison, Kori S. Boggs, Krislyn M. Hayden, Emily M. Cash, Rebecca E. Espinola, Janice A. Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret E. Sullivan, Ashley F. Mehrotra, Ateev Camargo, Carlos A. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine is used by emergency departments (EDs) to connect patients with specialty consultation and resources not available locally. Despite its utility, uptake of telemedicine in EDs has varied. We studied characteristics associated with telemedicine adoption during a 4‐year period. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2014 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)–New England survey and follow‐up data from 2016 and 2017 NEDI‐USA and 2018 NEDI‐New England surveys, with data from the Center for Connected Health Policy. Among EDs not using telemedicine in 2014, we examined characteristics associated with adoption by 2018. RESULTS: Of the 159 New England EDs with available data, 80 (50%) and 125 (79%) reported telemedicine receipt in 2014 and 2018, respectively. Among the 79 EDs without telemedicine in 2014, academic EDs were less likely to adopt by 2018 (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.46). State policy environment was not associated with likelihood of adoption. In 2018, all 7 freestanding EDs received telemedicine, whereas only 1 of 9 academic EDs (11%) did. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine use by EDs continues to grow rapidly and by 2018, >3 quarters of EDs in our sample were receiving telemedicine. From 2014 to 2018, the initiation of telemedicine receipt was less common among higher volume and academic EDs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7771831/ /pubmed/33392537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12233 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Zachrison, Kori S.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Hayden, Emily M.
Cash, Rebecca E.
Espinola, Janice A.
Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret E.
Sullivan, Ashley F.
Mehrotra, Ateev
Camargo, Carlos A.
Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title_full Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title_fullStr Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title_short Factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
title_sort factors associated with emergency department adoption of telemedicine: 2014 to 2018
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7771831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12233
work_keys_str_mv AT zachrisonkoris factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT boggskrislynm factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT haydenemilym factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT cashrebeccae factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT espinolajanicea factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT samuelskalowmargarete factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT sullivanashleyf factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT mehrotraateev factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018
AT camargocarlosa factorsassociatedwithemergencydepartmentadoptionoftelemedicine2014to2018