Cargando…

The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension

Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trujillo, James P., Simanova, Irina, Bekkering, Harold, Özyürek, Asli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31079227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y
_version_ 1783629817026969600
author Trujillo, James P.
Simanova, Irina
Bekkering, Harold
Özyürek, Asli
author_facet Trujillo, James P.
Simanova, Irina
Bekkering, Harold
Özyürek, Asli
author_sort Trujillo, James P.
collection PubMed
description Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If and how this modulation influences addressees’ comprehension of gestures have not been investigated. Here we ask whether communicative kinematic modulation enhances semantic comprehension (i.e., identification) of gestures. We additionally investigate whether any comprehension advantage is due to enhanced early identification or late identification. Participants (n = 20) watched videos of representational gestures produced in a more- (n = 60) or less-communicative (n = 60) context and performed a forced-choice recognition task. We tested the isolated role of kinematics by removing visibility of actor’s faces in Experiment I, and by reducing the stimuli to stick-light figures in Experiment II. Three video lengths were used to disentangle early identification from late identification. Accuracy and response time quantified main effects. Kinematic modulation was tested for correlations with task performance. We found higher gesture identification performance in more- compared to less-communicative gestures. However, early identification was only enhanced within a full visual context, while late identification occurred even when viewing isolated kinematics. Additionally, temporally segmented acts with more post-stroke holds were associated with higher accuracy. Our results demonstrate that communicative signaling, interacting with other visual cues, generally supports gesture identification, while kinematic modulation specifically enhances late identification in the absence of other cues. Results provide insights into mutual understanding processes as well as creating artificial communicative agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7772160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77721602021-01-04 The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension Trujillo, James P. Simanova, Irina Bekkering, Harold Özyürek, Asli Psychol Res Original Article Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If and how this modulation influences addressees’ comprehension of gestures have not been investigated. Here we ask whether communicative kinematic modulation enhances semantic comprehension (i.e., identification) of gestures. We additionally investigate whether any comprehension advantage is due to enhanced early identification or late identification. Participants (n = 20) watched videos of representational gestures produced in a more- (n = 60) or less-communicative (n = 60) context and performed a forced-choice recognition task. We tested the isolated role of kinematics by removing visibility of actor’s faces in Experiment I, and by reducing the stimuli to stick-light figures in Experiment II. Three video lengths were used to disentangle early identification from late identification. Accuracy and response time quantified main effects. Kinematic modulation was tested for correlations with task performance. We found higher gesture identification performance in more- compared to less-communicative gestures. However, early identification was only enhanced within a full visual context, while late identification occurred even when viewing isolated kinematics. Additionally, temporally segmented acts with more post-stroke holds were associated with higher accuracy. Our results demonstrate that communicative signaling, interacting with other visual cues, generally supports gesture identification, while kinematic modulation specifically enhances late identification in the absence of other cues. Results provide insights into mutual understanding processes as well as creating artificial communicative agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7772160/ /pubmed/31079227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Trujillo, James P.
Simanova, Irina
Bekkering, Harold
Özyürek, Asli
The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title_full The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title_fullStr The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title_full_unstemmed The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title_short The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
title_sort communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31079227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y
work_keys_str_mv AT trujillojamesp thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT simanovairina thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT bekkeringharold thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT ozyurekasli thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT trujillojamesp communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT simanovairina communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT bekkeringharold communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension
AT ozyurekasli communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension