Cargando…
The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension
Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31079227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y |
_version_ | 1783629817026969600 |
---|---|
author | Trujillo, James P. Simanova, Irina Bekkering, Harold Özyürek, Asli |
author_facet | Trujillo, James P. Simanova, Irina Bekkering, Harold Özyürek, Asli |
author_sort | Trujillo, James P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If and how this modulation influences addressees’ comprehension of gestures have not been investigated. Here we ask whether communicative kinematic modulation enhances semantic comprehension (i.e., identification) of gestures. We additionally investigate whether any comprehension advantage is due to enhanced early identification or late identification. Participants (n = 20) watched videos of representational gestures produced in a more- (n = 60) or less-communicative (n = 60) context and performed a forced-choice recognition task. We tested the isolated role of kinematics by removing visibility of actor’s faces in Experiment I, and by reducing the stimuli to stick-light figures in Experiment II. Three video lengths were used to disentangle early identification from late identification. Accuracy and response time quantified main effects. Kinematic modulation was tested for correlations with task performance. We found higher gesture identification performance in more- compared to less-communicative gestures. However, early identification was only enhanced within a full visual context, while late identification occurred even when viewing isolated kinematics. Additionally, temporally segmented acts with more post-stroke holds were associated with higher accuracy. Our results demonstrate that communicative signaling, interacting with other visual cues, generally supports gesture identification, while kinematic modulation specifically enhances late identification in the absence of other cues. Results provide insights into mutual understanding processes as well as creating artificial communicative agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7772160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77721602021-01-04 The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension Trujillo, James P. Simanova, Irina Bekkering, Harold Özyürek, Asli Psychol Res Original Article Humans are unique in their ability to communicate information through representational gestures which visually simulate an action (eg. moving hands as if opening a jar). Previous research indicates that the intention to communicate modulates the kinematics (e.g., velocity, size) of such gestures. If and how this modulation influences addressees’ comprehension of gestures have not been investigated. Here we ask whether communicative kinematic modulation enhances semantic comprehension (i.e., identification) of gestures. We additionally investigate whether any comprehension advantage is due to enhanced early identification or late identification. Participants (n = 20) watched videos of representational gestures produced in a more- (n = 60) or less-communicative (n = 60) context and performed a forced-choice recognition task. We tested the isolated role of kinematics by removing visibility of actor’s faces in Experiment I, and by reducing the stimuli to stick-light figures in Experiment II. Three video lengths were used to disentangle early identification from late identification. Accuracy and response time quantified main effects. Kinematic modulation was tested for correlations with task performance. We found higher gesture identification performance in more- compared to less-communicative gestures. However, early identification was only enhanced within a full visual context, while late identification occurred even when viewing isolated kinematics. Additionally, temporally segmented acts with more post-stroke holds were associated with higher accuracy. Our results demonstrate that communicative signaling, interacting with other visual cues, generally supports gesture identification, while kinematic modulation specifically enhances late identification in the absence of other cues. Results provide insights into mutual understanding processes as well as creating artificial communicative agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7772160/ /pubmed/31079227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Trujillo, James P. Simanova, Irina Bekkering, Harold Özyürek, Asli The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title | The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title_full | The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title_fullStr | The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title_full_unstemmed | The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title_short | The communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
title_sort | communicative advantage: how kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31079227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trujillojamesp thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT simanovairina thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT bekkeringharold thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT ozyurekasli thecommunicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT trujillojamesp communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT simanovairina communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT bekkeringharold communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension AT ozyurekasli communicativeadvantagehowkinematicsignalingsupportssemanticcomprehension |